Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump spent Monday trying to leave a muscular imprint on the homeland security debate in the wake of new attacks this weekend in New York, Minnesota and New Jersey.
As fears of another ISIS-linked terror attack permeated the national political debate, Trump took the opportunity to argue for his immigration plan. However, many of that plan’s details remain vague, particularly when it comes to how it would stop terrorism.
“These attacks and many others were made possible because of our extremely open immigration system which fails to properly vet and screen the individuals or families coming into our country,” Trump told a packed arena in Estero, Florida on Monday afternoon.
The businessman strongly touted his plan to stop immigration from countries that his administration would deem overrun by terrorist groups. So far, Trump has said only two countries fit this bill, Syria and Libya, and has said previously that. That plan to end all Muslim immigration remains on his website.
Trump said in a speech over the summer that specifics on that would wait until he was in the White House until he would begin ruling out immigration from other countries and regions. Trump still hasn’t clarified whether these countries would include NATO allies, such as Turkey and France, both of whom have dealt with ISIS-related terrorist attacks.
The suspect in the latest terror attack,, was born in Afghanistan. Notably, as of Monday night, Trump has not said that Afghanistan was on the list of banned countries.
Trump also touted his proposal of coming into the country.
“You can’t have vetting if you don’t look at ideology,” Trump said in Florida. “And Hillary Clinton refuses to consider an applicant’s worldview and thus their likelihood of being recruited into the terror cause at some later date, which is going to happen in many, many cases. This isn’t just a matter of terrorism. This is also really a question of quality of life. We want to make sure we are only admitting people into our country who love our country. We want them to love our country.”
Critics allege that this is impractical because potential terrorists could simply game the system and give whatever answers needed to gain entry to the United States. Trump himself seemed to admit this, albeit while making the opposite point about why Syrian refugees shouldn’t be allowed into the country.
“We don’t know where these people come from,” Trump said in Canton, Ohio last week. “We don’t know if they have love or hate in their heart and there’s no way to tell.”
Trump also brought up, repeatedly citing Israel throughout the day.
In an interview with Fox and Friends on Monday morning, Trump said, “You know, in Israel, they profile. They have done an unbelievable job, as good as you can do. But Israel has done an unbelievable job and they will profile. They profile. They see somebody that’s suspicious. They will profile. They will take that person in and check out. Do we have a choice? Look what’s going on. Do we really have a choice?”
Trump also said: “If somebody looks like he’s got a massive bomb on his back, we won’t go up to that person and say, ‘I’m sorry,’ -- because if he looks like he comes from that part of the world, we’re not allowed to profile. Give me a break.”
Hours later, Trump expressed similar sentiments to conservative radio host Michael Savage.
“We’re looking at people and everybody’s supposed to be treated equally,” Trump said. “Well, it doesn’t work that way. It’s radical Islamic terrorism.”
He added: “But, you know, they want you to look at a woman who’s in a wheelchair, that’s 88-years-old, and barely making it, and let’s say, comes out of Sweden. She’s supposed to be treated the same way as a guy that looks just like the guy that just got captured, who is central casting for profiling.”
In an interview that aired on Monday night, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly asked specifically what kind of profiling Trump wanted to do. Trump was vague in his response.
“Where if we see somebody that we think there could be a problem. At airports and other places, you talk to them and you see what’s going on,” Trump said.
O’Reilly pressed on what Trump meant.
“I don’t know,” Trump said. “I don’t know. You’re gonna - these are experts. That’s what they do. They profile. You go to Israel and they should study because Israel has done a phenomenal job at this and they profile. And they are not happy about it but they do it. And people aren’t complaining about it but we have to profile.”
In that same interview, Trump even maintained that he never specified that it was Muslims that would be profiled.
“Well, first of all, I never said the term Muslim,” Trump said. “You did. You told me Muslims. I didn’t say that. I’m saying you’re going to profile people that maybe look suspicious. I didn’t say they were Muslims or not. You said that, Bill.”
Yet multiple times on Monday alone, Trump cited radical Islamic terrorism while laying out the case for profiling and, as noted earlier, remains on his campaign’s website.
Also on Monday, Trump continued his trend of, this time about Rahami’s foreign connections.
“I think there’s many foreign connections,” Trump said. “I think this is one group. Okay? This is one group. but you have many, many groups, because we’re allowing these people to come into our country and destroy our country and make it unsafe for people.”
It is still not confirmed what links Rahami had to any terror groups. When Trump made the comments, Rahami had not even been taken into custody.
Trump also said Rahami could expect lenient treatment from the justice system, including “room service, knowing the way our country is. And on top of all of that, he will be represented by an outstanding lawyer.” He said that instead Rahami, an American citizen, should be treated as an enemy combatant.
Trump has called for Americans to sometimes be treated as enemy combatants before. “Well I know that they want to try em’ in our regular court systems, and I don’t like that at all,”. “I don’t like that at all. I would say they could be tried there, that’ll be fine.”
According to a recent ABC News/Washington Post poll, terrorism is the second most important issue for voters. The first is the economy. On terrorism, 47 percent say they trust Clinton more, while 44 percent say they trust Trump.
Whether Trump’s hardline policies continue to attract support remains to be seen. But on Monday, Trump made clear that he viewed the weekend attacks as a validation of his campaign rhetoric. “We have a country to keep safe. And we’re not going to keep our country safe. You see this happening, and you know and I know it’s going to get worse,” he told O’Reilly.
And then, as the Fox host tossed to a commercial break, Trump added, “Unless I’m president.”