Terror Trials Worry Pentagon Lawyers

The Pentagon's top uniformed lawyers are taking issue with a key part of a White House plan to prosecute terrorism detainees, telling Congress that limiting the suspects' access to evidence could violate treaty obligations.

Their testimony to a House committee on Thursday marked the latest instance in which military lawyers have publicly challenged Bush administration proposals to keep some evidence — such as classified information — from accused terrorists. In the past, some military officials have expressed concerns that if the United States adopts such standards, captured American troops might be treated the same way.

The lawyers' testimony contrasted with the panel chairman's assertion that the United States must take a harder line when prosecuting terrorists.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, who heads the House Armed Services Committee, said at the hearing that any military commission established to prosecute terrorists must allow the government to protect intelligence sources. In saying so, the California Republican aligned himself with the White House position.

"While we need to provide basic fairness in our prosecutions. We must preserve the ability of our war fighters to operate effectively on the battlefield," Hunter said.

Hunter presented the military lawyers with various scenarios in which it might be necessary to withhold evidence from the accused if it would expose classified information. But the service's top lawyers said other alternatives must be explored — or the case dropped.

"I believe the accused should see that evidence," said Maj. Gen. Scott Black, the Army's Judge Advocate General.

Black and the other lawyers said such an allowance was a fundamental right in other court systems and would meet requirements under the Geneva Conventions.

But Hunter suggested that such a requirement could hamper prosecutions.

"Some of these acts of complicity in terrorist acts are very small pieces . . . and you don't have a lot of evidence," he said. The chairman repeated a scenario where the only piece of evidence would expose the identity of a secret agent and asked whether it would make sense to drop the case entirely.

"You get to the end of the trail, then yes sir, you do," Black responded.

The hearing came a day after Mr. Bush acknowledged for the first time that the CIA had secret prisons overseas and defended the practice of tough interrogations to force terrorists to reveal plots to attack the United States and its allies.

He revealed that 14 suspects, including the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks, had been turned over to the Defense Department and moved to the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for trial.

Meanwhile, the commander of the Guantanamo Bay lockup said the 14 suspects are in good health after their transfers from CIA prisons overseas.

Adm. Harry Harris says he won't reveal any details about the new prisoners' confinement for what he calls "operational security reasons."

But he did say he personally signed for custody when the 14 arrived Monday. And that all "are being provided the same dietary and cultural amenities that are afforded to all other detainees" at Guantanamo.

Separately, State Department legal adviser John Bellinger III told foreign reporters Thursday that if additional members of the al Qaeda terror network were captured, "We reserve the right to have those people questioned by the CIA."

Bellinger said foreign governments were free to decide whether to look for the locations of any CIA prisons on their territory, but "we are not going to talk about that." European lawmakers on Thursday demanded to know the exact location of the prisons.

The president proposed legislation Wednesday that would aid the government in prosecuting terrorists using secret military tribunals. The proposal left Republicans again divided over how the nation should treat its most dangerous terror suspects, setting up a showdown in Congress just weeks away from elections when all members will try to sell themselves as tough on terror.

Mr. Bush's announcement was immediately praised by those who said his policies were necessary to win the war on terror.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said he wants a vote on the bill by the end of the month and will likely decide Friday morning when the bill should reach the floor. House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, has promised a vote on the administration's measure there during the week of Sept. 18.

But some GOP moderates in the Senate are challenging the proposal. They include three senators with hefty credentials: Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who spent more than five years as a prisoner of war in North Vietnam; Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a former military lawyer who still serves in the Air Force Reserves as a reserve judge; and Sen. John Warner of Virginia, chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

A leadership aide said Warner, McCain and Graham were given "24 hours to think their position over," indicating a possibility the bill could be routed around the Armed Services Committee and placed directly on the Senate floor.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Mr. Bush's decision to prosecute the terrorists held by the CIA was long overdue. But, he added, the military commission system should be properly vetted through the Armed Services Committee.

"The last thing we need is a repeat of the arrogant, go-it-alone behavior that has jeopardized and delayed efforts to bring these terrorists to justice for five years," Reid said.