BACK IN SESSION: We'll continue to hear from Dave Harris, representing "The People" in this hearing, he's got about an hour (at most) left he told the judge before lunch.

Then, we'll get about a half hour from Peterson's attorney. Then it's a 90 day MAX wait for a decision.

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

Harris: Nice wasn't very good at filling out forms and demonstrated so, Harris said, in multiple occasions. @CBSSacramento

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

Gardner's final words were for the court to consider the evidence in totality, now Harris uses the same phrase, to read more of Nice's answers on this jury questionnaire. @CBSSacramento

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

We're streaming this hearing on @CBSSacramento -- Peterson is no stranger to days in court like this in San Mateo County, he was first convicted in this courthouse back in 2004. Trial was moved here originally because of "massive" publicity.https://t.co/wLDWW89K13 pic.twitter.com/1XfGxDo0Sg

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

Defense is focused on the inconsistencies, they say, in Nice's recollection of events in her life related to the two incidents that would relate to a crime, domestic violence.

We see quotes from a 2000 restraining order vs. 2022 testimony given as part of this hearing.

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

The jury questionnaire is to determine if a juror is qualified to serve as a juror.

Ultimately, this hearing is all about Nice's answers in that questionnaire, that they say, she did not answer truthfully and therefore, its misconduct and Peterson should get a new trial.

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

Starts in on the jury misconduct, that the juror nicknamed "Strawberry Shortcake" did not disclose information during voir dire, that she had "concealed relevant facts." @CBSSacramento

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

This is all about a juror who failed to disclose during jury selection that she sought a restraining order while pregnant in 2000, saying she "really fears for her unborn child" because of threats from her boyfriend's ex-girlfriend. @CBSSacramento

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022

San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo: "Not everyone has the same definition of a lawsuit..."

Gardner agreed.

Later on, Judge Massullo: "would it not be important then for the attorneys during the actual voir dire, to clarify..." @CBSSacramento

— Madisen Keavy (@madisenkeavy) August 11, 2022