Trying to Decipher Microsoft's Entertainment Division
This weekend, a reader emailed and upbraided me for missing that Microsoft had signed new parts deals and moved to a smaller GPU die, all of which should theoretically saved money and reduced the costs of the Xbox 360. We went back and forth a bit, only agreeing that Microsoft seemed desperate. In the process, I dug out the most recent 10K available, went though some explanations -- and came away more perplexed than ever.
In its fiscal year 2008 (ending June 30), the revenue of the entertainment and devices division was $8.14 billion and there was actually a profit: $426 million. That amount still seems pathetic when compared to what Microsoft might ordinarily charge -- until you examine how the company breaks out revenue and expenses:
Due to our integrated business structure, operating costs included in one segment may benefit other segments. Therefore, these segments are not designed to measure operating income or loss that is directly related to the products and services included in each segment. Inter-segment cost commissions are estimated by management and used to compensate or charge each segment for such shared costs and to motivate shared effort. Segments should not be viewed as discrete or easily separable businesses.When I read through the detailed description of what the entertainment and device division was, my jaw fairly dropped. The products are easily listed:
- Xbox 360 console and games
- Xbox Live
- Zune
- Mediaroom
- many consumer hardware and software products (including mice and keyboards)
- Windows Mobile software and services platform
- Windows Embedded
- Windows Automotive
- Surface
- Given that the division made a profit even with all the push for Vista, it might be making a heck of a lot more money.
- The Office and Windows product lines are showing enormous profit partly because one of the biggest expenses, marketing/sales, gets ascribed to another division.
Why would Microsoft do that? Maybe because stock price is so important to the company and management, and anything decreasing the apparent fiscal strength would not be appreciated by the investment community. What better way of making Vista look stronger than to have a 12 percent operating income increase from 2006 to 2007 and a 14 percent increase from 2007 to 2008.