The Supreme Court on Friday announced it would take up an anti-abortion Louisiana law, the first time the high court will look at abortion regulations since Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh flipped the Supreme Court conservative. If the justices rule in favor of Louisiana's law, the state would become the seventh in the country with just one abortion clinic.
The law in question is nearly identical to one that the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional in 2016. The high court in February indicated it would take a thorough look at the case when it agreed to block the law requiring doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.
The Supreme Court's announcement drew a swift reaction from abortion rights groups.
"Louisiana is openly defying the Supreme Court's decision from just three years ago, in which they found an identical Texas law unconstitutional," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which is challenging Louisiana's law. "We are counting on the Court to follow its precedent, otherwise, clinics will needlessly close and there will be just one doctor left in the entire state to provide abortion care."
The justices met in private earlier this week to discuss the hundreds of appeals that piled up over the summer.
The most significant of those pending appeals involved abortion regulations in Louisiana and an ultrasound requirement in Indiana, on which the court did not act Friday. Both cases involve the standard first laid out by the court in 1992 that while states can regulate abortion they can't do things that place an "undue burden" on a woman's right to an abortion.
Louisiana abortion providers and a district judge who initially heard the case said one or maybe two of the state's three abortion clinics would have to close under the new law. There would be at most two doctors who could meet its requirements, they said.
But the appeals court in New Orleans rejected those claims, doubting that any clinics would have to close and saying the doctors had not tried hard enough to establish relationships with local hospitals.
In January, the full appeals court voted 9-6 not to get involved in the case, setting up the Supreme Court appeal.
In February, the justices split 5-4 to keep the law on hold. Chief Justice John Roberts, a dissenter in the 2016 case from Texas, joined with the court's four liberal justices to temporarily block the Louisiana measure.
For Roberts, it was a rare vote against an abortion restriction in more than 13 years as chief justice, perhaps a reflection of his new role since Kennedy's retirement as the court's swing justice and his concern about the court being perceived as a partisan institution.
Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, along with Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, would have allowed Louisiana to begin enforcing the clinic regulations.
The Hope Medical Group clinic in Shreveport, Louisiana, and two doctors whose identities are not revealed said in their appeal that the justices should strike down the law without even holding arguments because the decision so clearly conflicts with the Texas ruling from 2016.
The court did not follow that path Friday. The Supreme Court decision comes three days after Planned Parenthood announced the building of fighting to keep its license.— just 13 miles away from Missouri's last remaining abortion clinic, a facility in St. Louis that is
With a newly conservative Supreme Court, access to abortion has come under fire across the South and Midwest, where state lawmakers have raced toin hopes of overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court case that effectively legalized the procedure nationwide.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.