Iraq Rebuild: Your Tax $ At Work (Not)
A severe lack of maintenance appears to be threatening the future usefulness of some of the facilities renovated during the effort to rebuild Iraq, says a new report from the U.S. inspector general monitoring reconstruction.
Inspectors from the Office of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, which is charged with reviewing Iraqi reconstruction projects that are financed by the U.S., visited eight facilities throughout the country, to determine whether the buildings were operating at full capacity.
What the inspectors discovered is that, even though those facilities had been completed and declared to be successes, and subsequently met the stated "objectives" of reconstruction, they were not functioning properly.
Sites suffered from deterioration, poor or no maintenance, or were not even being used by the people for whom they were built, at a cost to U.S. taxpayers of approximately $150 million.
And these were sites that the United States had previously declared to be signs of Iraq's rebirth: police stations, a military base, a maternity hospital, a recruiting center.
While officials said the eight sampled projects could not be the basis for solely judging the success or merits of U.S.-backed reconstruction efforts in Iraq, the functionality of the facilities raised serious concerns about the rebuild effort, which to Washington has been almost as important as a military victory.
For example, at a recruiting center in Al Hilla, inspectors found bathrooms with floors buckled by what appeared to be sewage backups, makeshift electrical wiring, and sewage holding tanks that were never evacuated because concrete barriers blocked access to the rear of the building where the tanks are located. The inspectors concluded that the quality of the recruiting center's construction met objectives, but that the problems, if left unresolved, would significantly shorten the useful life of the facility.
At a maternity and pediatric hospital in Erbil, inspectors again found a sewer system that was occasionally clogged, possibly as a result of improper disposal of large amounts of medical wastes, and a water purification system that was not working.
During the site visits there, inspectors saw needles, bandages and other examples of medical wastes in the sewer system's traps and septic tank. A new incinerator was not in use because those initially trained in running it were no longer employed. Also, workers were using an excessive amount of water to clean floors, leading to considerable amounts of water being absorbed into the walls.
The inspections were more positive for two police stations that were reviewed, both in Mosul. Each appeared to be able to operate at full capacity, the inspector general said.
At the Gaugli-Asher station, in particular, inspectors said that "full capacity operations over the long term will likely result" if Iraqi police continue to properly use and maintain the building and its equipment.
However, the review of a second station showed that some of the contractor work did not meet requirements; razor wire was secured by sand bags; and no one knew how to fix or run the generator providing electricity.
"As a result, the new generator system, which cost $79,000, is not being used and the repaired and upgraded electrical system and components have been degraded," inspectors said.
At Baghdad International Airport, $11.8 million worth of new electrical generators had been installed. The inspectors found that $8.6 million worth were no longer working.
"These first inspections indicate that the concerns that we and others have had about the Iraqis sustaining our investments in these projects are valid," Stuart W. Bowen Jr., who leads the office of the special inspector general, told The New York Times for an article published Sunday.
The inspector general's quarterly report on Iraq reconstruction is being released Monday. Reports dealing with specific aspects of the reconstruction were released over the last few days.
In Other Developments: