Democratic lawmakers are becoming persuaded that Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) would have a more positive impact on other Democrats on the November ballot than Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.).Steve asks, "Do superdelegates care?" I'd answer, "How could they not?" Perhaps a few more of them ought to get off the fence and try to bring this thing to an end.
Obama's advantage over Clinton would be most pronounced in the Southern and Western states President Bush carried in 2000 and 2004, say lawmakers interviewed by The Hill.
....Obama will "bring new people into the process in Southern states, there's no question about it," said Rep. James Clyburn, the House Democratic whip from South Carolina. "In these Southern states he's bringing out more people, young people, African-Americans. They're being energized by him."
Clyburn, who has stayed neutral in the primary, said Obama at the top of the ticket would "certainly" do more to help other Democratic candidates, citing South Carolina and Mississippi specifically.
...."I've had quiet conversations with a number of members," said Rep. Rick Boucher (D-Va.), who has endorsed Obama. "I don't think there's any doubt about it, Obama would be more helpful to House candidates virtually everywhere."
COATTAILS....Via Steve Benen, The Hill reports that downticket Democrats are becoming more and more convinced that Barack Obama's coattails would be a lot longer than Hillary Clinton's: