U.S.-Iran Updates: Nuclear site inspections will happen, but timing "not essential," IAEA chief says

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, President Trump claimed the U.S. may never know whose missile was responsible for striking a girls' school in Minab, Iran, in late February at the start of the war. And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declined to give a timeline on releasing the results of the Pentagon's investigation. 

Iranian authorities said the strike on Shajareh Tayyebeh girls' elementary school killed over 160 people, including schoolchildren. A preliminary U.S. assessment said the U.S. was "likely" responsible for the deadly attack, but that it was not intentional, a person briefed on the preliminary intelligence told CBS News in March. 

The president said he hasn't seen a report on the deadly incident. 

"I have not seen it, no. At some point. Well, I have to wait for it to be complete," the president said. 

"I don't know that they're ever going to solve that problem," he continued. "I mean you could ask Pete. But I don't know that they're ever, they're going to say it was one of our missiles, Pete, I don't know that they're ever going to solve that problem in terms of whose fault was it. Because there were missiles flying all over the place. And it's horrible what happened. But there were missiles flying all over the place. And somebody said it was our missile? Well maybe it wasn't our missile, but I've seen nothing to lead me to believe it was. There were plenty of missiles being flown by other people."

Hegseth said the Pentagon has "taken the investigation very seriously," although he didn't say when a report would be released. 

"When the appropriate time is right, whatever that outcome is, that'll be the time to divulge it," Hegseth said.

"I don't think it was us," Mr. Trump added. 

In an Oval Office meeting with President Trump, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said the president has done something important with Iran in working to prevent their nuclear capabilities. 

Rutte said thousands of planes have taken off from U.S. bases in Europe during the operation in Iran. Still, Mr. Trump said he wishes NATO could have done more. The president said he was "disappointed" with most of the European countries. 

Rutte came prepared with charts on European defense spending and investments in the U.S.

The secretary-general said he doesn't have many disagreements with Mr. Trump, but defended Germany and other countries that he says have worked hard to keep bilateral commitments. 

"I don't have many disagreements with the president of the United States," Rutte interjected. "Here I have slightly, because I do believe there is reason for disappointment, absolutely. But my argument is this. These are isolated cases … I would argue it would have been very difficult to do Iran without having Europe as a power protection platform for the United States."

Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana said he confronted the president over the war with Iran on Wednesday and described the heated exchange for reporters.

Cassidy, who lost his Senate primary to a Trump-backed challenger in May, said he told the president during a meeting with GOP senators that "our original objectives have not been achieved, and I want to know what's going on." 

He said he would be voting to rein in the president's ability to strike Iran "until I get a briefing."

"At which point, as I recall, he did not particularly care for my comments. Raised his voice," Cassidy said. "I lost my temper. That's not appropriate. It's the Irish in me. But I, again, matched his tone and his volume."

At one point, Mr. Trump sternly told Cassidy to sit down, after questions arose about the War Powers Resolution, sources directly familiar with the meeting told CBS BNews.

Read more here.

A majority of American voters think U.S. military action in Iran was not worth it, according to a new Quinnipiac poll.

Sixty percent of voters think the U.S. military action wasn't worth it, while 34% think it was worth it, according to the poll. An overwhelming number of Democrats (93%) believe it was not worth it, while 75% of Republicans think it was worth it. Independents fall at a 66-29% split against the action.

"After months of diplomatic fits and starts, global economic repercussions and a broad loss of life in the region, a majority of voters make their feelings clear: the Iran war was a bad idea," Quinnipiac University Polling Analyst Tim Malloy said in a statement.

The poll also asked voters what they thought about the Iran memorandum of understanding. Some 59% of respondents are either not so confident or not confident at all that the deal will work, according to the poll. Also, 61% of respondents said it was very likely or somewhat likely Iran will develop nuclear weapons.

Only 38% of voters approve of how President Trump is handling his job as president.

House Republicans raised concerns on Wednesday about the Trump administration's Iran memorandum of understanding, particularly around sanctions relief, unfreezing assets, nuclear inspections and the potential cost of implementation, even as many continue to support the president's military action against Iran.

Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon said he would be "very hesitant to give $1 to Iran," arguing "money's fungible" and warning any sanctions relief could ultimately benefit terrorism. Bacon also questioned reconstruction funding, saying, "Why would we be doing reconstruction of the IRGC government?" 

Rep. Mike Lawler, of New York, said "any final agreement has to address the issue of the enriched uranium" and argued that "the enriched uranium is what matters here" as discussions continue around sanctions relief and unfreezing assets.

Georgia Rep. Rich McCormick said he is "not a big fan of the MOU" and questioned whether Iran would uphold its commitments. 

"I just don't trust them," he said, adding he wants to see the administration's "long-term plan and the strategy."

Most of the Republicans, however, did support the administration's $80 billion supplemental bill because the U.S. needs to restore its depleted stock of munitions.

Despite bipartisan criticism, President Trump said the war is going "very, very well" as part of brief comments before a meeting with senators on Capitol Hill.

"As you know, we're winning by a lot," Mr. Trump said. "Iran is making very big concessions. We'll see what happens — but it has been very, very, very powerful."

Trump is on Capitol Hill to talk with GOP senators about the SAVE America Act, a bill imposing strict new rules for registering to vote, casting ballots and more. The bill faces opposition from many in the House and Senate.

However, some of those in the meeting, such as Sens. Thom Tillis and Mike Rounds, have also been critical of Mr. Trump's negotiations with Iran.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei spoke out Wednesday against comments by Secretary of State Marco Rubio a day earlier, throwing back Rubio's words about Iran assisting proxies in the region.

"No one will be fooled; we can't have a peaceful region so long as American militarism and interventionism persist, and their occupying proxy continues, with absolute impunity, to inflict endless wars across the region and perpetrate genocide, terror violence and every atrocities," Baqaei said in a post on X.

Baqaei was responding to comments Rubio made as he traveled to the region on Monday.

"If Iran's leadership makes a decision that they want to be a country, instead of a revolutionary movement that exports terror, they're going to have an opportunity to do incredible things in Iran," Rubio said, in a post shared on X and responded to today by Baqaei. 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Wednesday that he is unaware of any country that backs Iran imposing tolls for transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

"I know of no country on the planet that supports tolling or fees for the use of the strait," Rubio said in Kuwait during a tour of the region.

CBS News tracked dozens of commercial vessels transiting the crucial strait on Wednesday or are on their way to the designated route. On Tuesday, the U.N.'s International Maritime Organization and Oman announced a temporary corridor being opened to evacuate stranded vessels from the Persian Gulf.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Wednesday that the United States would be in lockstep with its allies in the Gulf region during negotiations with Iran.

"We're going to be completely aligned with our partners in the Gulf," Rubio told reporters during a stop in Kuwait. "That's why I've taken these trips now, and it's the reason why I'm here." 

He said the U.S. would "engage them on conversations about every decision that's made with regards to this negotiation."

"We're not going to do anything that undermines the security of our allies, our longstanding allies in the region," Rubio said. 

The evacuation of more than 11,000 sailors stranded in the Gulf because of the U.S.-Iran war will take "a few weeks", the head of the International Maritime Organization told AFP Wednesday.

"It will take us a few weeks before we can actually complete the evacuation" of about 600 ships stuck since the start of the conflict, IMO secretary-general Arsenio Dominguez said in an interview.

Dominguez added that the U.N. agency hopes to eventually evacuate "around 50 vessels a day," having begun the operation to allow safe passage Tuesday.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said Wednesday that the United States has not demanded that Israel withdraw its troops from southern Lebanon, a condition reportedly set by Tehran in ceasefire negotiations.

"We have announced that in any case we are not withdrawing and, as of this moment — and this is a diplomatic achievement — there is no American demand for Israel to withdraw from Lebanon," Katz said in an interview at a convention of local leaders in Tel Aviv.

When asked if the army would adhere to such a U.S. request if it arrived, Katz said he told U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told President Trump, that "we are there to protect the residents of the north."

Iran, and Lebanon's government, have demanded for weeks that Israeli forces withdrawal from the neighboring nation, but the memorandum of understanding signed by the U.S. and Iran calls only for an end to hostilities, without specifically addressing Israel's occupation of Lebanese territory.

Iran has bristled at the Israeli presence, and ongoing small-scale, tit-for-tat attacks between Israel and Hezbollah, but mediator Pakistan said Wednesday that the 60-day U.S.-Iran negotiations initiated by the memorandum of understanding would likely resume next week.

CBS/AFP

Following an announcement by the United Nations' International Maritime Organization and Oman on Tuesday of a temporary corridor being opened to evacuate stranded vessels and mariners from the Persian Gulf, CBS News tracked dozens of commercial vessels making the transit on Wednesday or are on their way to the designated route. 

Oman authorized the route along its coastline, south of the historic shipping lanes that take a more central path through the strait, which are believed to be mined. 

A second corridor runs north of the long-standing shipping lanes, along a route close to Iran's coast, which Iranian authorities have exerted control over since not long after the U.S. and Israel launched their joint war on Iran.

Ships tracked making the crossing along the coast of Oman included a mix of cargo vessels and tankers, many bound for Oman's Shinos port, while others were broadcasting destinations including Singapore, India and Malaysia. At least 24 had transited or were headed to the route close to Oman with their broadcast systems turned on Wednesday, while another 15 were taking the northern corridor, presumably coordinating with Iranian authorities.

The IMO announced the plan Monday, saying over 11,000 seafarers were still stranded in the region. At least 14 civilian seafarers have been killed in the Gulf region since the start of the U.S.-Iran war. The large-scale evacuation operation is being coordinated with Iran and Oman as well as other Gulf nations, the U.S., and the maritime industry, the IMO said.

Pakistan, the primary mediator between the U.S. and Iran, has supported the "restoration of status quo" for shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, foreign ministry spokesman Tahir Andrabi told reporters Wednesday in Islamabad. 

He acknowledged, however, Iran and Oman's attempt to lay some claim to the vital waterway and said Islamabad would "support regional efforts" in that regard.

"Pakistan has supported the restoration of status quo ante on the Strait of Hormuz," said Andrabi, referring to the conditions prior to the U.S. and Israel launching their joint war on Iran. Navigation through the international waterway was free and unrestricted until the conflict. Its de-facto closure by Iran in retaliation for the war sent global gas and oil prices skyrocketing.

Iran and Oman have said that, following the current 60-day period of negotiations between Washington and Tehran, they will implement a new system as the two states with coastline in the strait to control maritime traffic, which could include "costs" for shippers.

"We have taken note of the parlays, at least the press releases on the parlays, between Iran and Oman on this subject," Andrabi said Wednesday. "We will support regional efforts, and with a spirit of regional ownership of this process, particularly the littoral states to the Gulf, as such."

He said the "R4" countries — Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt — "would obviously be supporting any regional solution to this issue, particularly with respect to respecting the sovereignty, territorial integrity and the natural maritime boundaries of the littoral states to the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz."

Talks between the U.S. and Iran will likely continue next week, a Pakistani foreign ministry spokesperson said Wednesday.

"Talks are continuing. I believe that the talks will resume next week, probably on Tuesday," Tahir Andrabi told reporters in Islamabad, adding that a current pause in the negotiations was, "a temporary gap, and it is not as such a break." 

"The fact that the talks are continuing — the parties are on the table — is a significant positive outcome. We certainly view it very positively," he said.

Pakistan was the primary mediator behind the direct, high-level talks between the U.S. and Iran that began Sunday in Switzerland. That first 18-hour meeting was followed by more in-depth negotiations between lower level officials, described as "technical talks."

The negotiations, aimed at reaching a much broader deal to end the Iran war, were sparked by the memorandum of understanding signed last week by the U.S. and Iran, which calls for 60 days of talks on issues including Iran's nuclear program, the dropping of U.S. and international sanctions against the country, and the un-freezing of billions of dollars of Iranian financial assets.

Qatari officials have also acted as mediators between the two sides.  

The price of Brent North Sea crude, the international benchmark for oil, continued falling Wednesday, trading under $75 a barrel for the first time since the start of the Middle East war.

Brent slid 3.1 percent to $74.73, extending its fall since the United States and Iran last week signed the memorandum of understanding and began the process of re-opening the Strait of Hormuz.

The Israeli military said it struck two Hezbollah fighters Wednesday in southern Lebanon, as low-level fighting between the two sides continues, testing a fragile ceasefire.

In a statement, Israeli Defense Forces said soldiers "identified two armed Hezbollah terrorists near the Security Zone, posing an immediate threat to them. Following the identification, the Israeli Air Force and the soldiers struck the terrorists in order to remove the threat."

Israeli forces currently occupy an area that spans the country's northern border with Lebanon and extends around six miles into Lebanese territory. Israeli leaders say the "security zone" will be held, and expelled residents not permitted to return to their homes, until the threat posed by Iranian-backed Hezbollah is removed.

The fighting has threatened to derail the negotiations between the U.S. and Iran as the memorandum of understanding signed by both parties calls for a cessation fighting on all fronts in the region, including in Lebanon.

President Trump declared defiantly Wednesday that Iran is not charging fees for transiting the Strait of Hormuz. He did not mention, however, Iran's plans to manage traffic through the vital shipping route in conjunction with Oman in the future - which Tehran and Muscat have said could involve "costs" for shippers.

"Iran has informed the U.S. that, despite troublemaking Fake News reporting to the contrary, there are 'NO TOLLS, NO INSURANCE COSTS, & NO OTHER CHARGES OF ANY KIND BEING SOUGHT OR RECEIVED BY IRAN ON SHIPS TRAVELING THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ," Mr. Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform, adding: "If this is false information, negotiations would end, immediately!"

Under the memorandum of understanding signed by Mr. Trump and his Iranian counterpart last week, Tehran agreed to allow ships to transit the strait with no charge during the 60-day negotiation period currently underway.

The memorandum of understanding calls for Iran to "conduct dialogue with the sultanate of Oman to define the future administration and maritime services in the Strait of Hormuz," and specifies that any new system must be in line with applicable international laws. It does not explicitly bar Iran from charging fees for passage in the future, however, which Tehran has said for weeks that it will do, though not during the current 60 days of negotiations with the U.S.

On Tuesday, Iran and Oman reiterated that the two nations were hashing out plans to jointly manage commercial shipping in the strait going forward, and they said services they provide to vessels would have "costs associated."

Iran's deputy foreign minister said Wednesday that the question of nuclear inspections would only be settled in a final agreement with the U.S.

In a social media post, Kazeem Gharibabadi, one of Iran's top negotiators and the country's deputy foreign minister, said Iranian officials had not met with the head of the United Nations' nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, in Switzerland over the weekend during the first round of talks with the U.S.

Gharibabadi also reiterated Iran officials' statements from Tuesday, saying there were no plans to allow IAEA inspectors to visit sensitive nuclear sites bombed in June 2025 by the U.S. and Israel.

"These issues will only be examined and settled within the framework of a final agreement, and as a result of the other party's practical action to terminate all sanctions," he said.

The memorandum of understanding signed last week does not set a timeframe for renewed IAEA inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities, saying only that all matters relating to the Iranian enrichment program will be agreed as part of a final deal.

Iran's chief negotiator called the deal it struck with the U.S. "a declaration of America's defeat" on Wednesday.

"The Islamabad understanding was not the result of pressure and coercion, but rather the result of the resistance and authority of the brave Iranian nation," Iran's top negotiator Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said Wednesday of the agreement signed last week.

"That is why, the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding became a declaration of America's defeat," he said, adding that security in the Middle East must be ensured by the countries of the region.

President Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed the agreement last week, launching a designated 60-day negotiating period during which Pakistani and other mediators hope to bring the two sides to a permanent settlement to end the war.

The head of the U.N.'s nuclear agency signaled Wednesday that Iranian nuclear enrichment sites would be visited by his inspectors, a key component in the interim deal between the United States and Iran to reach an end to the war.

The comment by International Atomic Energy Agency head Rafael Mariano Grossi was the firmest yet from the United Nations agency, which is viewed as key in determining the status of Iran's nuclear stockpile.

The U.S. and Iran offered contradictory remarks Tuesday about whether those sites would be inspected.

"I can understand political statements, they are part of the reality, but the fundamental thing I would like to remind you (of) and draw your attention to is that there has been a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by both presidents," Grossi told journalists at a news conference from the tsunami-hit Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan.

The accord "explicitly states that the nuclear activities that are going to be carried out with the regards of the nuclear material facilities will be supervised by the IAEA — in all letters," he said.

Grossi added: "Obviously, to do that, we have to inspect. Whether this happens the day after tomorrow or in one week or in ten days, it's important, but not essential. This is going to happen."

Those inspections are key for the deal, which calls for Iran's stockpile of uranium to be "downblended" from highly enriched levels.

Rubio arrived in the United Arab Emirates on Tuesday and was scheduled to hold closed-door talks with its leader, Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed, before flying to Kuwait and then Bahrain, where he will attend a Gulf Cooperation Council meeting.

Rubio said he intended to discuss the US-Iran memorandum of understanding with gulf leaders, which does not address Iran's missile programme and proxies.

He insisted that no country is allowed to impose tolls on the Strait of Hormuz after Oman and Iran, which border the waterway, said they were considering charging "costs" for navigating the key exit route for oil and gas.

"It's an international waterway," he said as he arrived in Abu Dhabi, repeating a position the US has stated throughout the war.

"No country is allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway. That's existing international law."

The Senate on Tuesday approved a House-passed war powers resolution on Iran, marking the first time such a measure has made it through both chambers and signifying a rare rebuke of President Trump's handling of the conflict.

In a 50 to 48 vote, four Republicans — Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Rand Paul of Kentucky — joined the bulk of Senate Democrats in support of the measure. One Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, opposed. Two Republicans — Mitch McConnell and Dave McCormick — did not vote.

The resolution directs the president to "remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran," unless Congress declares war or authorizes the use of military force. But the measure is a concurrent resolution, which doesn't carry the force of law and doesn't require the president's signature, meaning it is largely symbolic.

Read more here.

President Trump said early Wednesday that consumers are being "gouged" because gas prices haven't been falling as fast as crude oil prices have on world markets — so he's told the Department of Justice to begin an investigation.

He said on his Truth Social platform that, "The big Oil Companies are not dropping their price at the pump commensurate with the sharply lower prices they are paying for Oil. Those prices are dropping like a rock! In other words, customers are being 'gouged.' I have instructed the DOJ to immediately start looking into this. Gasoline prices better start going down a lot faster than what I'm seeing!"

Oil prices increased sharply when the Iran war began and gas prices followed. But while crude prices have dropped significantly since an interim agreement was reached to end the fighting, the decline in gas prices hasn't been as rapid. Gas prices generally tend to dip more slowly than they rise with respect to oil costs.