Why exploiting the 'carry trade' seems to work

The carry trade shouldn't be profitable, yet there are profits to be had.

(MoneyWatch) There's an approach to investing called the "carry-trade" strategy that, in theory, shouldn't work. Yet there are profits to be had, and a recent paper tries to shed some light on why this seeming anomaly is working.

The carry-trade strategy involves borrowing, or shorting, a currency with a relatively low interest rate and using the proceeds to purchase, or go long, a currency yielding a higher interest rate. Once you unwind the trade, you pocket the difference. The strategy can be "enhanced" though the use of leverage.

Uncovered interest parity (UIP) theory states that expected returns should be equal on otherwise comparable financial assets denominated in different currencies. Thus, we should expect the low-yielding currency to appreciate by the same amount as the return differential. However, there's overwhelming empirical evidence against the UIP theory.

A way to get stock-like returns with less risk
How innovation affects stocks
Why this souped-up investment tool can kill you

The authors of the 2011 paper, "Properties of Foreign Exchange Risk Premiums," sought to provide the answer to the UIP puzzle and thereby provide an economic rationale for the existence of the carry trade. They studied six major foreign exchange markets over a 20-year period. The following is a summary of their findings:

  • Risk premiums explain the success of the carry trade.
  • The time varying excess returns are compensation for both currency risk and interest rate risk -- high interest rate currencies typically depreciate when domestic consumption growth is low (such as in 2008), while low interest rate currencies appreciate under the same conditions.
  • Financial and macroeconomic variables are important drivers of the foreign exchange risk premium.
  • Expected excess returns are related to global risk aversion. In times of global market uncertainty and higher funding liquidity constraints, investors demand higher risk premiums on high-yield currencies and accept lower (or more negative) risk premiums on low-yield currencies. This supports "flight-to-quality" and "flight-to-liquidity" arguments for the risk premium in the carry trade.
  • Expected excess returns are countercyclical to the state of the U.S. economy.

The authors concluded that "foreign exchange risk premiums are driven by global risk perception and macroeconomic variables in a way that is consistent with economic intuition." These findings are consistent with the findings of other research on the carry trade, adding to the body of research demonstrating the reasons for the both the existence of the carry trade and its success.

Image courtesy of taxbrackets.org

  • Larry Swedroe On Twitter»

    Larry Swedroe is director of research for The BAM Alliance. He has authored or co-authored 13 books, including his most recent, Think, Act, and Invest Like Warren Buffett. His opinions and comments expressed on this site are his own and may not accurately reflect those of the firm.