Billy Payne, the Chairman of Augusta National Golf Club, where the Masters is played, delivered a gratuitous lecture to Woods the day before the tournament began. In his rather misguided and self-righteous sermon, Payne said, "Our hero did not live up to the expectations of the role model we saw for our children." Give me a break! A pro golfer as a role model for our children? If Woods was a leader (in business, government, the clergy, etc.), then yes, Payne's comments would have been spot on. But it strikes me as dumb to hold the the world's best golfer up to the same standards to which we should hold real leaders. Here's why. The word "leader" is misleading: it means being the head of an organization or group, a role that includes inspiring everyone else and galvanizing followership. But it can also refer to the person with the lowest score on the golf course (the "leader" on the scoreboard). We're talking about two very different things here. Part of real leadership is serving as a behavioral role model. Barack Obama recognizes this and does it admirably. But Tiger Woods is supposed to be really good at golf, period. While I'm not defending what he did in his private life, to cast it in such moralistic terms rather than seeing it as a fundamentally private, emotional problem strikes me as misdirected and hypocritical.
In fact, if Billy Payne, who is supposed to be the "leader" of a golf club, were acting as a real leader, he would have stuck to his knitting and graciously welcomed us all to the Masters. True leaders lead people. Celebrities are not generally leaders of other people. There's nothing wrong with being a star, but they're usually looking out for Number One.