Why Fair Market Values Should Drive Revised Bailout Plan
The shocking (at least to some of us) thumbs-down by Congress to the financial buyout program now brings us to Plan 2: improving Plan 1.
A number of financial thinkers and economists agree with the House majority that the first plan had a major fault -- taxpayers assumed all of the risk while firms receiving help contributed little to the package. It seems certain that in the days to come this will be a central area of focus by lawmakers.
- Prevent the overpaying for assets by requiring that the Treasury pay fair market prices. "If troubled assets are purchased at fair market value," he says, "taxpayers might get an adequate return on their investment."
- Address the undercapitalization of financial firms by allowing the Treasury to purchase, again at fair market value, new securities issued by institutions in need of capital. "Simply buying existing distressed assets won't necessarily channel the capital where it needs to go. Allowing the infusion of capital directly for consideration in new securities can do so."
- To ensure fair market value prices, Treasury purchases should be made through multi-buyer competitive processes with appropriate incentives.
Related Reading: Harvard Business School Faculty Look at Causes and Consequences of the Financial Crisis (HBS Working Knowledge)
(Stock market bear by azrainman, CC 2.0)
--
This post first appeared in BNET's The View From Harvard Business.