Last Updated Oct 23, 2007 6:19 PM EDT
Online publishing companies argue that comScore's and Nielsen/NetRatings' methodology (which uses a representative panel's activity to extrapolate total traffic) doesn't account for the influx of Web surfers who visit sites at work. Some companies take the argument even further, questioning whether the panels actually represent all Web users.
So the numbers are off. Will advertisers really care? Peter Kafka at Silicon Alley Insider thinks not:
The more relevant question: How much does this really matter to Web advertisers? The Times argues that the confusion is slowing the growth of the Web ad market, but given that marketers continue to pour money into the Internet, it's hard to make that case. One reason why that's so: Web advertisers are most often buying a certain number of impressions, and those impressions are usually purchased and audited by a third-party insertion company. So it's not terribly relevant if a Web site claims they have 15.3 million uniques, and comScore says they have 13.2 million: Advertiser X just needs to know that their ad was served up Y times in Z time-frame.If you take a look at the comments on his blog, you'll notice readers are not in agreement with Kafka. What's your take?
- The Online Numbers Game (CNN Money)
- CEO Perspective: Comparing the Proverbial Apples to Oranges (comScore)