Watch CBSN Live

Prostate cancer tests don't save lives, study says

rectal exam, proctology, prostate cancer
Most men experience prostate enlargement with age. It can block the urethra and cause overflow incontinence, which is the leakage of a small amount of urine, or difficulty urinating. Prostate removal due to cancer can also damage or weaken the pelvic floor muscles and nerves around the bladder, and it may cause significant leakage issues for about half of men just after surgery. One in five still has problems a year or more later. This is one reason doctors often suggest "watchful waiting" for slow-growing prostate cancers, says Dr. Steers. Delaying the surgery can also help you avoid erectile dysfunction. More from 10 ways to keep your bladder healthy istockphoto

(CBS/AP) Think routine screening for prostate cancer saves men's lives? Think again.

In a 20-year study of more than 9,000 men, scientists found no difference in the rate of prostate cancer deaths between the men who got periodic screenings and those who didn't.

"There is no escaping the fact that we need a better help detect prostate cancers that actually need treating, as opposed to innocent ones that do not," Malcolm Mason, a prostate cancer expert at Cancer Research U.K., said in a statement. "In the meantime, men should be fully informed about the pros and cons of having their PSA measured."

Screening for prostate cancer has long been controversial, and the new findings aren't likely to end the debate. Critics say screening leads to needless biopsies and treatment with little proof that it saves lives. False positive tests can cause significant harms, including psychological distress and treatments that can cause impotence and incontinence.

Screening is done with a blood test for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and a digital rectal exam, in which a doctor inserts a gloved finger into the rectum. The PSA blood test is controversial because a man's PSA level can be high for many reasons. A positive result must be confirmed by a biopsy.

If prostate cancer is found, there's no agreement on the best way to treat it: "watchful waiting," surgery, hormone therapy, radiation, or a combination of those. Most tumors grow so slowly they are never life-threatening, and the treatments can have serious side effects.

The study, which involved more than 9,000 men, was conducted in Norrkoping, Sweden. About 1,500 men were randomly selected to be screened every three years from 1987 to 1996. They only got digital exams on the first two visits. The PSA test was added for the next two. For the fourth and final screening, only men aged 69 or under were included. The remaining 7,532 men were not screened.

During the 20 years of follow-up, 85 men (about 6 percent) in the screened group and 292 men (about 4 percent) in the no-screening group were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The death rate from prostate cancer was similar in both groups, the researchers reported.

The American Cancer Society does not recommend routine screening for most men.

The study was published online Thursday in the journal BMJ.

View CBS News In
CBS News App Open
Chrome Safari Continue