Last Updated Apr 23, 2010 10:57 PM EDT
And it's a development that should worry the energy industry. In short, this climate-change bill was the best chance to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, promote clean energy and the like, without obliterating the bottom line of coal producers, oil and gas companies, utilities and refiners. Without a climate-change bill, which would have to be passed prior to mid-term elections this fall, the EPA will surely step forward and begin regulating GHGs under the Clean Air Act.
Hints that immigration could move up the line already sent Graham into a tizzy earlier this week. Graham said an immigration bill isn't ready -- and he should know since he's working on one with Sen. Chuck Schumer. More importantly, Graham said it "destroys the ability to do something like energy and climate."
Graham, Kerry and Lieberman have worked for months cobbling together a climate-change bill that takes an "all of the above" approach to energy. And it's even got support from three of the five big oil companies and the trade group Edison Electric Institute, Mother Jones reported.
Here's one way the climate-change bill could be saved, and it's a development that could actually benefit the energy industry and other special interest groups still unhappy with the legislation. As Mother Jones notes, the tripartisan trio has to roll out a bill Monday that has support. Without it, the bill will certainly be passed over. That means some last minute deal-making over the weekend, if it's not happening already, to ensure a climate and energy bill has a chance. Or Kerry-Graham-Lieberman could pull any fence-sitting senators aside and point out that the EPA is ready to take over, if Congress falls short.
Photo of Dead End sign from Flickr user bennylin0724, CC 2.0