FBI Faced 9/11 Obstacles

The FBI 's way of doing business prior to Sept. 11 hampered its ability to track terrorist threats, according to a report released Tuesday by the staff of the commission investigation the 2001 attacks.

The panel was beginning a new two-day round of hearings Tuesday with testimony from former FBI Director Louis Freeh, Attorney General John Ashcroft and former Attorney General Janet Reno. Thomas Pickard, who served as acting FBI director in the months just before the attacks, and former CIA counterterrorism center director Cofer Black also were scheduled to testify.


CBSNews.com is Webcasting the 9/11 panel hearings throughout the day.

"The FBI is going to have to answer the question: 'Why didn't they deliver the information up? Did they get clear instructions from the top that it should be delivered up?'" said former Sen. Bob Kerrey, a Democratic member of the Sept. 11 commission.

CBS News Correspondent Jim Stewart reports the FBI and officials responsible for directing it face questions over why the FBI didn't act when its Phoenix office urged a national inquiry into whether Arab extremists were taking flight training, and why it didn't connect that dot to the arrest a month later of Zacarias Moussaoui who aroused suspicions at another flight school.

Another mystery is why Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, who lived with an FBI informant in San Diego, were not added to a terrorist watch list until they were already here.

The commission's report, which is preliminary, found a host of cultural and practical problems confronting the FBI's counterterrorism efforts.

"On September 11, 2001, the FBI was limited in several areas critical to an effective, preventive counterterrorism strategy," the report concluded. "Those working counterterrorism matters did so despite limited intelligence collection and strategic analysis capabilities, a limited capacity to share information both internally and externally, insufficient training, an overly complex legal regime, and inadequate resources."

The report outlined several successes by the FBI — like catching people in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and 1998 Embassy bombing cases — but also catalogued a host of problems in the bureau's counterterrorism efforts.

Its historic focus on organized crime meant that agents saw counterterrorism as a "backwater." Resource restraints compounded the problem, the report found.

Quoting an external review of the FBI, the staff report said, "by 2000 there were twice as many agents devoted to drug enforcement matters as to counterterrorism."

"On September 11, 2001, only about 1,300 agents, or six percent of the FBI's total personnel, worked on counterterrorism," it read.

The report found that the FBI's counterterrorism strategy "was not a focus of the Justice Department in 2001." The Bush administration proposed a major increase in FBI funding, but an internal budget plan from early 2001 "made reducing the incidence of gun violence and reducing the trafficking of illegal drugs priority objectives."

The bureau's counterterrorism chief, Dale Watson, told the commission "that he almost fell out of his chair when he saw the memo, because it made no mention of counterterrorism."

Those agents who did work on counterterrorism faced other obstacles.

FBI field offices took the lead on most cases, hampering efforts to detect larger, nationwide plots. Faulty information management systems further restricted the ability to share information, and agents were reluctant to write investigative findings down because the documents could be used be defense lawyers to undermine criminal cases.

In addition, agents felt bound by legal guidelines from the 1970s meant to curb the misuse of federal power, and by "the wall" — the legal separation of criminal and intelligence investigations. Since intelligence officers had wider surveillance powers, "the wall" was meant to prevent any misuse of those powers by criminal investigators. But agents worried about the wall did not communicate with one another.

"Justice Department prosecutors and FBI criminal agents were responsible for large criminal cases, like the Embassy bombings. The intelligence side of the FBI, though, had the legal tools that were essential for domestic intelligence work, such as FISA surveillance," the report found.

"In this environment, domestic counterterrorism efforts were impaired," it said.

In an article in Monday's Wall Street Journal, Freeh said the FBI "relentlessly did its job pursuing terrorists" before the attacks but was hampered by lack of resources and political will.

Commission members were skeptical.

"I mean, there were a number of things that happened, some of them in the FBI. There were miscommunications between intelligence agencies, a miscommunication within the FBI itself," commission chairman Thomas Kean, a former Republican New Jersey governor, told the CBS News Early Show. "And if some of those things hadn't occurred, who knows, things might have been a little different."

The panel's vice chairman, former Democratic Congressman Lee Hamilton, added: "what is very clear is that with all of these investigations going forward by the FBI, the pertinent information did not rise to the top so that the top policymakers could take action."

Freeh says there were budgetary constraints. Hamilton acknowledged that, "Congress is a culprit here as well as many others, including myself."

Still, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said in a letter Monday to current FBI Director Robert Mueller that total FBI spending rose some 132 percent from 1993 to 2003, with counterterrorism requests nearly always met or exceeded.