But in the runup, there's already been a charmingly brusque exchange between the judge and Biogen -- an exchange which suggests that Biogen's lawyers can't read. In her Aug. 7 order, Judge Deborah Batts wrote this (click to enlarge images):
Judicial handwriting is often in the same league as physician handwriting, but in this case that looks pretty clearly like: "2 copies of all motion papers and relevant documents to be delivered by hand to chambers on or before Friday, 8/21/09 at 3:00PM."
Not to Biogen. A note to the judge from Elan's lawyers the same day states that Biogen and Elan immediately went into an "amicable disagreement" as to what Batts' order meant. Elan thinks it meant deliver all motion papers on Aug. 21 so that the court can be ready for battle on Aug. 31; Biogen read it to mean "come to the August 31 conference prepared to discuss an expedited briefing schedule."
Judge Batts responded in the margins of Elan's memo by simply writing "right" next to Elan's version of events and "wrong" next to Biogen's:
- Previous BNET coverage of Elan:
- Elan v. Biogen: A Look at What Their Tysabri Contract Actually Says
- Pfizer Patent Suit Could Make Elan Bapineuzamab Talks Go a Whole Lot Easier
- In Elan-J&J Deal, Many Unanswered Questions (Wyeth Being One)
- If Novartis Buys Elan's Tysabri and MS Drug, There Won't Be Much Elan Left
- Elan-Pfizer Deal Rumor Is Deja Vu All Over Again
- Elan Stock Keeps Rising Despite Denial of BMS Takeover
- Elan Silent on Corporate Jets as 230 Are Laid Off
- Elan Management Creates Self-Enrichment Plan as Pfizer-Wyeth Deal Threatens Bapineuzumab
- Elan Chairman: "We're Qualified Managers Because We're Irish"
- Elan Sees Problems on Alzheimer's Drug; Puts Itself Up for Sale