Last Updated Mar 8, 2010 9:00 AM EST
Oops! Turns out he didn't make it to the working group. Why, you might wonder, did he say he went, when in fact he hadn't been there? We can only speculate, but lying to Congress sure sounds like a great way to hit the self-destruct button, and to do so over something that was probably inconsequential to his testimony seems even more difficult to fathom.
Was it a "white lie" -- a throwaway comment that he added to somehow burnish his credibility and make him sound more knowledgeable about Arbitron's controversial technology? Perhaps. Everyone, and I mean everyone, gets anxious when testifying before a Congressional committee, and anxiety makes some people do stupid things. But making stuff up is a bad idea generally, and even worse when it's a federal offense.
In cases like this, one might also wonder whether a smal lie is the tip of the iceberg and provides a clue to a larger aspect of the person's character. An Arbitron director, William Kerr -- and now Skarzynski's successor as CEO -- says that "board members made a 'fairly exhaustive effort' to uncover any other problems with the former CEO's tenure. 'We have found nothing beyond this specific question that should raise concern,' Mr. Kerr added."
I love "fairly exhaustive efforts"; they're almost as good as exhaustive efforts.
While Skarzynski's lie may indeed have been an isolated incident, prompted by situational anxiety or who knows what, it does raise questions about how a person in a leadership role manages his own anxiety, and about how that, in turn, affects his judgment. Skarzynski was sitting on a very hot seat. For Arbiton's sake, let's hope his successor has a better grip.