The termination of an emergency immigration restriction known asmarks a major policy shift in how the U.S. processes migrants who reach the southern border, including those hoping to ask for asylum.
For over three years, since the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. border officials under Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden have cited Title 42 to expel hundreds of thousands of migrants to Mexico or their home countries on the grounds that their entry could contribute to the spread of the coronavirus.
While officially a public health measure, Title 42 has been used as a tool to manage and deter illegal border crossings, especially under the Biden administration, which has faced an unprecedented migration wave fueled in part by mass exoduses from crisis-stricken countries like Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Progressive Democrats and advocates have condemned Title 42 because it blocked migrants from requesting asylum, a legal right they normally have if they reach U.S. soil. Republicans portrayed it as an effective border control tool, proposing to codify Title 42 into law so it can be used outside of the pandemic context.
Because it relied on the rule for over three years, the U.S. expects to see a sharp increase in migrant arrivals now that Title 42 has ended. To preempt the potentially historic spike in border crossings, the Biden administration has unveiledthat pair measures to deter migration, such as a restriction on asylum, with expanded opportunities for migrants to enter the U.S. legally.
When did Title 42 end, and why?
Title 42 expired at 11:59 p.m. on May 11, because the national COVID-19 public health emergency also expired, eliminating one of the legal underpinnings of the policy.
Since it was enacted by the Trump administration in March 2020, Title 42 has allowed the U.S. to expel migrants over 2.7 million times from the southern border, according to official government figures.
Until the spring of 2022, the U.S. government argued that Title 42 was needed to contain the coronavirus,public health experts. But in April 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said there was no public health basis to continue expelling migrants and announced it would phase out Title 42.
Title 42 remained in place due to an order from a federal judge in Louisiana who agreed to a request from Republican-led states tothe policy's termination on technical grounds. The expulsions were again set to end in December 2022 after another federal judge the rule illegal. But his ruling was later by the U.S. Supreme Court, again at the request of Republican-led states.
What happens after Title 42?
U.S. officials have said they expect the level of border crossings to rise now that Title 42 has expired, citing the tens of thousands migrants waiting in Mexico and the rapid dissemination of information about U.S. policy changes by smugglers.
Troy Miller, the top official at U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), recently told Congress that his agency was preparing for as many as 10,000 migrants to cross the southern border each day after Title 42 ends, which would almost double the daily average in March. Other internal government projections suggest that daily migrant arrivals could rise to between 11,000 and 13,000, absent a major policy change.
Border Patrol processed more than 10,000 migrants each day across the southern border this week, setting all-time records for 24-hour periods, a senior Department of Homeland Security official told CBS News. On Wednesday, more than 20,000 migrants were in Border Patrol custody, prompting officials to authorize the quick release of some migrants found not to be a threat to public safety or national security.
were waiting near the border for Title 42 to end, Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz told CBS News on Thursday.
Is the government prepared?
In January, the Biden administrationits first comprehensive border strategy, expanding Title 42 to expel Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans to Mexico if they entered the U.S. unlawfully, while allowing up to 30,000 migrants from those countries to fly to the U.S. per month under a sponsorship program. It also started allowing asylum-seekers in Mexico to secure appointments to enter the country via .
The administration is continuing these policies, which led to a sharp drop in border arrivals among the affected nationalities, now that Title 42 has ended. It is also increasing the number of appointments distributed by the phone app, so more asylum-seekers can enter the U.S. at ports of entry along the southern border.
More recently, the administration announced it would set up processing centers in Latin America, starting in Colombia and Guatemala, to vet migrants for eligibility to be resettled in those countries, the U.S., Canada or Spain. It also said it would allow some citizens of Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador to fly to the U.S. under a program for those with approved visa requests from relatives who are U.S. citizens or residents.
But the administration has also said it will increase regular deportations, including through a process known as expedited removal under which migrants can be quickly deported and banished from the U.S. for five years. The increase in deportations was expected to work in conjunction withdisqualifying migrants from asylum if they failed to seek refuge in a third country before crossing into the U.S. illegally.
On May 2, the Department of Defense announcedof another 1,500 active-duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border to relieve some of the pressure on Border Patrol agents by helping them with administrative and operational tasks, such as transportation and data-entry.
Despite the administration's moves, border communities have voiced concerns about their ability to absorb large numbers of migrants, with several cities in Texas recently issuing emergency declarations. Border crossings increased sharply in the lead-up to Title 42's expiration, overwhelming Border Patrol holding facilities and prompting the agency to release hundreds of migrants in cities like El Paso, Texas.
While a migration spike is likely, the end of Title 42 will not completely alter current border policy, since most migrants have not been processed under the pandemic rule in recent months. Still, once Title 42 lifts, the U.S. will need to process all migrants who reach American soil under regular immigration law, known as Title 8.
What is Title 8 and how does it differ from Title 42?
Under Title 8, the section of the U.S. code containing all immigration laws, the U.S. is required to give migrants who request asylum a preliminary interview or a chance to present their case in front of an immigration judge.
That doesn't mean the U.S. won't deport migrants post-Title 42. Those who don't claim asylum or who fail preliminary interviews with asylum officers could be deported under the expedited removal process to their home country or Mexico, which hasto continue accepting some non-Mexican deportees.
In fact, the administration has been working to speed up these interviews by keeping migrants in Border Patrol custody until asylum officers determine whether they should be deported. Through the new rule, it is also making the interviews more difficult to pass for non-Mexican migrants who didn't seek asylum elsewhere.
Because of diplomatic reasons and operational constraints, such as insufficient detention capacity and deportation flights, not all migrants will be processed under expedited removal. Some migrants will be given a notice to appear in court, and either released into the U.S. or sent to long-term detention centers.
While some adults could be detained, families with children not processed under expedited removal are expected to be released, since officials have ruled out restarting family detention. Title 42's end will not alter the processing of unaccompanied minors, as the policy has not applied to them since late 2020. These children are housed in federal shelters and allowed to stay in the U.S. while their immigration cases are reviewed.
Migrants given court notices will get an opportunity to seek asylum in front of an immigration judge. But because the immigration court system is dealing withof hundreds of thousands of unresolved cases, their claims are not likely to be adjudicated for years.
for more features.