CBSN

​Florida's 24-hour waiting period for abortions has been suspended,

In this July 9, 2013 file photo, opponents and supporters of an abortion bill hold signs near a news conference outside the Texas Capitol, in Austin, Texas after a federal appeals court reinstated part of a Texas law restricting abortions.

AP Photo/Eric Gay, File

TALLAHASSEE, Fla.--The Florida Supreme Court suspended the state's 24-hour waiting period for abortions on Friday until it decides whether to hear a lawsuit claiming the law is unconstitutional.

The 5-2 decision comes two months after an aappeals court allowed the law to go into effect. It was immediately praised by the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, which is suing on behalf of a Gainesville clinic to block the law.

"Women should not suffer this burden while there is an ongoing challenge to this unconstitutional law. Forcing women seeking an abortion to make multiple visits that are medically unnecessary especially burdens poor and working women, and is potentially dangerous," said Nancy Abudu, legal director of the ACLU of Florida. "This law was about the legislature creating needless burdens to limit a woman's access to reproductive care."

The ACLU says the Florida Constitution protects the women's private medical decisions.

Republican Gov. Rick Scott signed the waiting period into law last year, at the time joining at least 26 other states with similar laws. Scott's office didn't immediately react to the ruling.

"We will review it," said Scott spokeswoman Jackie Schutz

While not a party to the lawsuit, Planned Parenthood of Florida said the law has caused problems for women seeking abortions during the two months it's been in effect.

"It's definitely been difficult for many of them. They've traveled a great distance just to be told they have to come back and take time off work or classes," said Laura Goodhue, a spokeswoman for the group. "Politicians are passing laws with the intent of shaming and judging women."

While the court's decision doesn't guarantee it will review the law, it's a good indication that it will.

Justices Ricky Polston and Charles Canady opposed the decision.