The document, released Monday by the Justice Department, says one interrogator said a colleague had told Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that if any other attacks happened in the United States, "We're going to kill your children."
Another interrogator allegedly tried to convince a different terror suspect detainee that his mother would be sexually assaulted in front of him - though the interrogator in question denied making such a threat.
A CIA contractor beat another prisoner with a heavy flashlight, reports CBS News correspondent Bob Orr. The report notes, "The detainee died in custody." And Abd al-Nashiri, suspected bomber of the USS Cole, was threatened with a handgun and power drill. "The debriefer ... revved the drill while the detainee stood naked and hooded," the report said.
The report, written in 2004, examined CIA treatment of terror detainees following the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. It has been declassified as part of a lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union.
The report reveals CIA field agents also used mock executions and choke holds. But, whole sections remain secret. Details of the waterboarding of top al Qaeda officials are blacked out, Orr reports. The report shows some interrogators clearly went beyond the harsh interrogation techniques authorized by the Bush Administration's so-called "torture memos."
"They really do show an agency that in some respects is completely out of control. And out of control by design," ACLU attorney Jameel Jaffer told Orr.
10 Things About the CIA's Bad Day
Holder Taps Prosecutor to Probe CIA Abuses
Unplugged: Uncovering CIA Interrogations
W.H.: CIA Not Out of Interrogation Biz
New Unit Will Question Key Terror Suspects
Panetta Defends CIA in E-Mail to Agency
Dems Laud, Republicans Slam CIA Interrogation News
Expert: CIA Techniques Were Torture
Meanwhile, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr., a Justice Department prosecutor, to investigate whether interrogators may have broken any laws by threatening terror suspects.
"I don't think that the attorney general had much choice, politically anyway, but to take this step and launch this criminal investigation," writes CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. "And even the CIA itself acknowledges that some of its agents, current and former, went beyond legal limits in interrogation. The question is whether crimes were committed and can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt."
"This is just an initial step," Cohen adds. "Just because there is now a prosecutor doesn't guarantee we'll see any CIA trials and certainly doesn't ensure any convictions. All of the problems that existed before - problems with classified information and inadmissible evidence - still remain."
President Obama, vacationing in Martha's Vineyard, has repeatedly said he has no interest in prosecuting Bush Administration officials who crafted the harsh interrogation policies - or those who followed them. He repeated his assertion that the U.S. should look forward and not back.
His press secretary today reiterated that point in a statement, but added that "determinations about whether someone broke the law are made independently by the Attorney General."
The I-G also claims that harsh interrogations, at times, did work and helped the U.S. capture terror suspects and thwart potential attacks, Orr reports.
But, the release of the long-classified report and the appointment of a prosecutor have outraged CIA employees.
Today CIA Director Leon Panetta tried to boost sagging morale promising the Agency he'll "stand up for those officers who did what their country asked and who followed the legal guidance they were given."
And there's one more change that may be viewed as a slap at the CIA. Going forward, the FBI will be in charge of interrogations, overseen by the president's National Security Council.