Ten hours before parts of the federal government shut down -- unless Congress manages to strike a budget deal -- the Senate will reconvene at 2 p.m. Monday to initiate the final rounds of fiscal ping-pong between the Democrat-controlled upper chamber and the GOP-controlled House.
There's . After rejecting a budget proposalthat would have kept the government running until Nov. 15, House members countered in the early hours of Sunday with a continuing resolution that would allocate funding until mid-December, but would also impose a one-year delay on key parts of the Affordable Care Act -- a measure Democrats have called a "non-starter."
Senate leaders have said they will never okay a spending bill that defunds President Obama's signature health care act, and Friday's series of procedural votes made that clear: The bill passed along party lines, with a specific vote to strip it of the health care language, even after promised to veto any legislation which defunds the health care act., attempted to mobilize opponents of "Obamacare" with a . Mr. Obama, for his part, has
House Republicans on Sundayfor recessing Friday, charging Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., with trying to "run out the clock." A spokesman for Reid responded shortly after with a statement vowing to remove from the House legislation any anti-Obamacare language.
"Knowing full well that the Senate would reject their empty political stunts, House Republicans voted to increase the deficit, deny women coverage for critical preventative services like contraception, and deny affordable health care to millions of Americans," said Adam Jentleson in Sunday's statement. "Tomorrow, the Senate will do exactly what we said we would do and reject these measures."
Presumably, then, House Republican leaders face another choice: To assent to the Senate's "clean" spending bill, devoid of any provision that guts Obamacare, or volley yet another unlikely proposal back to the Senate, inching ever closer to the hour of shutdown. The number three House Republican, House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., appeared to embrace the latter option in an interview on "Fox News Sunday."
"I think the House will get back together, and in enough time, send another provision -- not to shut the government down, but to fund it -- and it will have a few other options in there for the Senate to look at it again," he said. "We are not shutting down the government."
Appearing Sunday on CBS' "Face the Nation," Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.,could prevent a shutdown. But on the same show Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., Republicans will only come to the table as it pertains to delaying health care: "We have been trying for more than six months to get the Senate Republicans to agree to a conference committee on the budget. They refuse a conference committee when it comes to our budget."
Durbin said he was "willing to look at" a measure in the House bill that repeals a tax on medical devices -- "but not with a gun to my head, not with the prospect of shutting down the government." Still, he added, he's "afraid" the government will indeed shut down for a period this week -- a reality that has many Americans asking:?
Why is this happening - again?
The bill to fund the government this time around has stalled largely because conservatives have tried to seize the legislation as an opportunity to defund or delay the Affordable Care Act from the get-go, though it was an ultimately futile attempt: The driving parts of Obamacare will effectively remain intact unless the entire law is repealed.
Even if Congress doesn't authorize spending by Oct. 1, the government has plenty of other sources of funding to draw from to keep the law in place. A large portion of the health care law is funded with mandatory spending -- which Congress is required by law to keep up unless the law is repealed -- as well as multi-year funds still available in the event of a government shutdown.
But Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who authored the amendment to delay health care,Sunday on "Face the Nation" that it's a "reasonable request," citing "bipartisan support for the delay."
Paul, meanwhile, argued that President Obama is the one conducting the march toward a government shutdown: "I've said all along it's not a good idea to shut down government... but I also think that it's not a good idea to give the president 100 percent of what he wants on Obamacare without compromise," he said.
Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who serves with Blackburn on the House Budget Committee,a "total hoax." The Republican budget, he pointed out, actually kept major parts of Obamacare.
"Their budget would not balance if they hadn't kept the Medicare savings," Van Hollen said. "And every penny of the revenues brought in by Obamacare -- including the amount of revenue brought in by the medical device tax -- is what they've got in their budget."