Starting Gate: Going Global
As Barack Obama prepares for his upcoming trips to Iraq and Afghanistan and a jaunt through the power centers of Europe, the expectations seem to be growing -- not so much for any great policy development but for the spectacle itself.
The potential benefits and risks are obvious. Obama has the chance to shore up his foreign policy credentials in a setting befitting a presidential visit. The images and opportunities for Obama to appear statesmanlike should only enhance his stature to the voters back home. Of course, the spotlight means that any missteps or flubs are likely to be greatly enhanced as well.
As carefully as the trip appears to have been planned, the chances of a major mistake should be at a minimum. But there’s something about Obama taking off a good chunk of time in the middle of a presidential campaign that points to bigger concerns for Obama. The fact that the campaign appears to feel the need to bolster his foreign policy credentials with the trip highlights just how little time has been in the arena.
In 2000, George W. Bush appeared almost uninterested in foreign affairs at times. In a famous interview in New Hampshire, Bush was asked to name the leaders of several foreign countries and was unable to. Although it was a “gotcha” question from a local journalist, the episode combined with his stated desire to stay out of the business of foreign entanglements to portray a candidate who had little experience in global affairs.
Of course, the events that have happened in the interim have made foreign policy an essential for a presidential candidate, and Obama’s is limited. That’s one reason for taking this trip before the election. As John McCain and his campaign have pointed out this week, Obama’s policy approach seems to be set already, especially when it comes to the war in Iraq. Nothing that happens on this trip seems likely to change any of that.
McCain, and Hillary Clinton before him, have argued that Obama’s inexperience raises serious questions about his ability to handle a complicated and dangerous world. The Democrat is taking precious time out of his campaign to try and inoculate himself against those concerns. And his counter-argument that the type of experience Clinton and McCain boast hasn’t been effective has so far carried the day among voters. Still, the stakes are significant for this trip if he wants to take the next step towards becoming the odds-on front-runner in this race.
Around The Track
Bill Clinton signaled that the chill of the primary season is beginning to thaw when he told reporters yesterday that he has spoken with Obama and is ready to hit the campaign trail on his behalf. “I told him that whenever he wanted me to do it, I was ready, and so it's basically on their timetable,” Clinton said. After the trouble the former president found himself in during the primary season, the bigger question might be whether the Obama campaign wants him to.
McCain is back in Michigan today to talk about the economy after raising an reported $1.4 million in a fundraiser in the state last night.
A federal judge ruled that Libertarian candidate Bob Barr should be allowed on the Ohio ballot this November after the party sued the sued the state for requirements that would have kept the former GOP congressman off, the AP reports. The ruling is under review and could be appealed but if Barr gets on the ballot in state like Ohio, it could damage McCain’s campaign by siphoning away conservatives.
The potential benefits and risks are obvious. Obama has the chance to shore up his foreign policy credentials in a setting befitting a presidential visit. The images and opportunities for Obama to appear statesmanlike should only enhance his stature to the voters back home. Of course, the spotlight means that any missteps or flubs are likely to be greatly enhanced as well.
As carefully as the trip appears to have been planned, the chances of a major mistake should be at a minimum. But there’s something about Obama taking off a good chunk of time in the middle of a presidential campaign that points to bigger concerns for Obama. The fact that the campaign appears to feel the need to bolster his foreign policy credentials with the trip highlights just how little time has been in the arena.
In 2000, George W. Bush appeared almost uninterested in foreign affairs at times. In a famous interview in New Hampshire, Bush was asked to name the leaders of several foreign countries and was unable to. Although it was a “gotcha” question from a local journalist, the episode combined with his stated desire to stay out of the business of foreign entanglements to portray a candidate who had little experience in global affairs.
Of course, the events that have happened in the interim have made foreign policy an essential for a presidential candidate, and Obama’s is limited. That’s one reason for taking this trip before the election. As John McCain and his campaign have pointed out this week, Obama’s policy approach seems to be set already, especially when it comes to the war in Iraq. Nothing that happens on this trip seems likely to change any of that.
McCain, and Hillary Clinton before him, have argued that Obama’s inexperience raises serious questions about his ability to handle a complicated and dangerous world. The Democrat is taking precious time out of his campaign to try and inoculate himself against those concerns. And his counter-argument that the type of experience Clinton and McCain boast hasn’t been effective has so far carried the day among voters. Still, the stakes are significant for this trip if he wants to take the next step towards becoming the odds-on front-runner in this race.
Around The Track
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 62 CommentsWho is Obama representing? And what exactly has he done in his lifetime to merit appropriating the Brandenburg Gate as a campaign prop? What was his role in the fight against communism, the liberation of Eastern Europe, the creation of what George Bush 41 -- who presided over the fall of the Berlin Wall but modestly declined to go there for a victory lap -- called "a Europe whole and free"?
There''s nothing new about narcissism in politics. Every senator looks in the mirror and sees a president. Nonetheless, has there ever been a presidential nominee with a wider gap between his estimation of himself and the sum total of his lifetime achievements?
Obama is a three-year senator without a single important legislative achievement to his name, a former Illinois state senator who voted "present" nearly 130 times. As president of the Harvard Law Review, as law professor and as legislator, has he ever produced a single notable piece of scholarship? Written a single memorable article? His most memorable work is a biography of his favorite subject: himself.
For the first few months of the campaign, the question about Obama was: Who is he? The question now is: Who does he think he is?
Of course the Republican Party that is behind the proliferation of higher fuel prices (to you and I) are against this new legislation and President Bush has already threatened to wave his magic veto wand against the American People.
But what can he run for, once he is elected president of the world?
Talk of this "tough" trip only illustrates that if one sets the bar low enough, even a Kerry-like shallow, arrogant, platitude-spouting, inexperienced, elitist, narcissistic, flip-flopping gas-bag, who is so mentally deficient from extensive drug use he even has to plagiarize his hollow platitudes, can pass it.
Sorry, hussein sycophants of the MSM - but everybody can see right through this phony challenge.
/
you are kidding... there are people who continue to believe this. Reagan has no legacy ion the fall of the USSR, just a lot of damage to the USA from his ignorance and bad leadership. We are now seeing why Reagan/Bush?bush is the worst set of leaders in US history, and their legacy must be relentlessly undone to save the country.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by andor3
I have to disagree partilly. Bush Sr. did a pretty good job. Bush Jr. just plain SUX!!
Posted by Mattcat25 at 11:44 AM : Jul 18, 2008
Spouting that lame A$$ excuse used by harry "I surrender" Reid makes you look as stupid as him. Can they driil and extract under these leases? No, I didn''t think so.
no habla espanol!!!
If you''re going to call other people stupid you should take pains to make sure you don''t show your own ignorance in the rocess. Of course they can drill and extract under the terms of the lease-that''s what the leases are for!
The oil companies are sitting on huge reserves while they play politics with the issue.
The fact is that even if they extracted the oil from the reserves they already control as quickly as possible and drilled offshore and all the other damaging things they want to do environmentally the price of gas would only go down less than a dime a gallon.
Of course, if the oil companies can con the public into giving away more drilling rights on public land without the companies having to pay royalties and without having to protect the environment they''ll take it.
Girls all around the world (lil Wayne song) are going to be swooning over this dude cause he''s got the TOP JOB.
Say hello to Mr. President Barack Obama!
The ladies notice that.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdyWicca2 at 02:53 PM : Jul 18, 2008
Rowdy, Bob Barr may well cost McCain the state of Georgia in the general. If that happens, McCain better have one he can steal from the blue states.
Posted by Ariel133
If it was a ''sure thing'' you wouldn''t be on here night and day trying to convince people to vote for McCain, lol.
YES, BARACK, GOOD LUCK WITH GAINING ANYTHING SIGNIFICANT, ALTHOUGH A LITTLE HISTORY LESSON MIGHT ENSURE THAT YOU CAN SPEAK ON YOUR OWN. PLUS, IF YOU FLUB, YOU''RE DONE. FEEL THE PRESSURE YET?
Yawn.
I think he means it too . . . only nobody flips that fast unless it''s in their best interest to be the wolf in sheep''s clothing, don''t you think?
Meaning is Bill Clinton suddenly so enthusiastic because he thinks there''s a strong chance Barack''ll lose and he needs to be seen as not playing any part whatsoever in his downfall?
The Clintons clearly think because Hillary got 18million votes that she''d actually ever have a shot at winning, when in fact the true message of Barack getting 18million+1 was to show that the country can''t stand them and want to move on.
I suppose the bright side of having to put up with more Clinton shenanigans in 2012 would be that bizarre carnival sideshow type entertainment of seeing Bubba exploding at reporters as they''re being served strings of humiliating defeats, and of Hillary being pulled off stage kicking and screaming that she''s not finished yet as she futilely pours more of their millions down the drain. Yikes . . .
All the best to him.
Defeat Bush''s latest prodigy.
and that kind of reasoning is why we''re at war in two countries, probably soon to be three.
Posted by jgg000 at 05:27 PM : Jul 18, 2008
What a coincidence - you don''t think he''s done anything wrong either, and think McCain will make a PERFECT successor for him.
That shows EXACTLY where your intelligence lies.
Yawn.
Posted by OneAmerican- at 05:02 PM : Jul 18, 2008
Vote for John McCain so he can finish the economic destruction of our country, keep us mired in iraq forever, and attack Iran which will cause a war our broken military won''t be able to withstand.
******I would have hoped by now, that McCain''s oh-so-valuable foreign policy experience might have led him, through intelligence and experience, to show better judgment than to take on bush''s poorly advised policies.
************+
ahhhh that''s our Prez!!!!
Posted by hungry1968 at 05:41 PM : Jul 18, 2008
Aren''t you the one who said Iran isn''t a threat to the world?
Obama is, as usual, being his usual brilliant self. By making headlines in Europe that McCain can''t, he can begin to make a case that he can talk one-to-one with all the world''s leaders. Watch how they handle it: there will be tons of pictures of Obama laughing it up, but there will be just as many serious posses, showing his gravitas and depth.
Obama does not need "300 advisors" for foreign affairs. He graduated from Columbia University in New York City, where he majored in political science with a specialization in international relations.
That was before going on to Harvard in late 1988 where he was selected as an editor of the law review based on his grades and a writing competition. In his second year he was elected president of the law review, a full-time volunteer position functioning as editor-in-chief and supervising the law review''s staff of 80 editors. Obama was elected in 1990 to be the first black president of the Harvard Law Review. He graduated with a J.D. magna *** laude from Harvard in 1991.
Can McCain come anywhere near this man''s abilities? We''ve had a dumb president for 8 years. Let''s try a smart one!
no habla espanol
Can you imagine the sneers of foreign leaders behind Obama''''s back?
Posted by joe1022joe at 09:42 PM : Jul 18, 2008
___________________________________
In your DREAMS , They are actually praying he does get into the Oval office,
Finally some stability, those SNEERS I think you hear is for the current JOKER in the Whitehouse. Dont get it twisted.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 62 Comments