crimesider

Jerry Sandusky Scandal: Inside Penn State's decision not to report child sex abuse

Victim #5 was very hesitant to testify against Jerry Sandusky in his child sex abuse case. Rebecca Jarvis speaks with Tom Kline, the attorney for Victim #5, about his client's reaction to the guilty verdict.

Jerry Sandusky was convicted of 45 criminal counts
AP Photo/Centre County Correctional Facility

(CBS) The Freeh report was released today detailing what Penn State officials knew about Jerry Sandusky's actions before and after the sex scandal made national headlines.

Pictures: Jerry Sandusky convicted of child sex abuse

The findings show that Penn State leaders attempted to cover up Jerry Sandusky's child sexual abuse for years in order to save the reputation of the school. The independent investigation also concluded that "in order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity," ex-athletic director Tim Curley, former head football coach Joe Paterno, former university vice president Gary Schultz and former university president Graham Spanier repeatedly concealed critical facts related to Sandusky's child abuse from the authorities.

The reports details a series of emails that vividly describe what Penn State University administration knew about the alleged Sandusky assault on a child in a shower on campus. It also paints a distinct picture of the steps taken after the incident.

Below is synopsis of those emails as taken from the Freeh report.

Feb. 9, 2001

- Sandusky assaults Victim 2 in Lasch Building Shower

- McQueary witnesses the assault by Sandusky

Feb. 10-12, 2001

- McQueary reports the assault to Paterno on Saturday, Feb. 10; Paterno tells McQueary, "you did what you had to do. It's my job now to figure out what we want to do."

- Paterno reports the incident to Curley and Schultz on Sunday, Feb. 11 as Paterno did not "want to interfere with their weekends."

- On Sunday, Feb. 11, Schultz consults with University outside counsel Wendell Courtney "re reporting of suspected child abuse."

- On Monday, Spanier, Schultz and Curley meet up to discuss a situation that Spanier describes as "unique," and a "heads-up" meeting; Schultz's confidential notes indicate he spoke to Curley, reviewed the history of the 1998 incident, and agreed that Curley would discuss the incident with Paterno and recommend that Curley meet with Sandusky. Schultz notes state: "Unless he confesses to having a problem, [Curley] will indicate we need to have DPW review the matter as an independent agency concerned w child welfare."

- Schultz asks University Police Department Chief Harmon if the report of the 1998 incident is in police files; Harmon responds that it is.

Feb. 25-26, 2001

- Spanier, Schultz and Curley meet and devise an action plan, reflected in Schultz's notes: "3) Tell chair* of Board of Second Mile 2) Report to Dept of Welfare. 1) Tell JS [Sandusky] to avoid bringing children alone into Lasch Bldg *who's the chair??" The plan is confirmed in a subsequent email from Schultz to Curley.

Feb. 27-28, 2001

- Curley emails Schultz and Spanier and says he [Curley] has changed his mind about the plan "after giving it more thought and talking it over with Joe [Paterno] yesterday." Curley now proposes to tell Sandusky "we feel there is a problem" and offer him "professional help." "If the is cooperative we would work with him to handle informing" the Second Mile; if Sandusky does not cooperate, "we don't have a choice and will inform" DPW and the Second Mile. "Additionally, I will let him know that his guests are not permitted to use our facilities."

- Spanier emails Curley and Schultz: "This approach is acceptable to me." He adds: "The only downside for use is if the message isn't 'heard' and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it. But that can be assessed down the road. The approach you outline is humane and a reasonable way to proceed."

  • Schultz concurs with the plan in an email to Curley and Spanier: "this is a more humane and upfront way to handle this." Schultz adds, "we can play it by ear" about informing DPW of the assault.

March 5, 2001

- Scheduled date of meeting between Curley and Sandusky. In his 2011 Grand Jury testimony, Curley said he told Sandusky "we were uncomfortable" about the incident and would report it to the Second Mile. Curley says he also told Sandusky to stop bringing children to the athletic facilities. Sandusky's counsel later reports that no accusation of sexual abuse was made at this meeting and that Sandusky offered to provide the name of the boy to Curley, but Curley did not want the boy's name.

March 16, 2001

- Board of Trustees meeting: Spanier does not report the Sandusky incident to the Board.

March 19, 2001

- Curley meets with the executive director of the Second Mile and "shared the information we had with him." The Second Mile leadership concludes the matter is a "non-incident," and takes no further action.

Complete coverage of Jerry Sandusky on CBSNews.com

  • Crimesider Staff

Comments

Follow Us