Political Hotsheet
November 13, 2009 3:11 PM

Zarate: U.S. Trial For Gitmo Detainees "Appropriate"

CBS News National Security Analyst Juan Zarate said on "Washington Unplugged" Friday that trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other Guantanamo Bay detainees in U.S. civilian courts was "an important decision, and appropriate."

"I think these are defendants that can be prosecuted, will be prosecuted," he said, adding: "This is a good set of defendants to put into the criminal legal system."

Host Bob Schieffer noted that the decision is already drawing strong criticism from people like New York Republican Rep. Peter King, who says the decision to hold the trial in New York City makes it a terrorist target.

"Well, I think security is always an issue with these cases," said Zarate. "But I think New York has handled big time cases before, dating back to the '93 World Trade Center case, and I think they know how to handle it."

"New York's at the top of the list for Al-Qaeda anyway, so I'm not sure that this necessarily ups the ante that much," he added.

Watch the entire conversation above. Also on Friday's show are interviews with Maggie Mahar, author of "Money Driven Medicine," and Claire Danes, Zac Efron and Richard Linklater of the film "Me and Orson Wells."

"Washington Unplugged" appears live on CBSNews.com each weekday at 12:30 p.m. ET. Click here to check out previous episodes.
Tags:
trial ,
new york ,
KSM ,
zac efron ,
Guantanamo Bay
Topics:
Washington Unplugged
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx

CBSNews.com On Digg

Add a Comment
by olyboy November 14, 2009 1:03 PM EST
Is there anyone outside of Washington's left that thinks this makes any sense at all? Why would we put the details of our defense against terrorists out in a public trial? Why would we give the protections of our legal system (which these folks have sworn to destroy) to a bunch of war criminals? I can't help but think that we've elected a group that doesn't live in the real world.
Reply to this comment
by GeezOhReally November 14, 2009 8:40 AM EST
These guys have already plead guilty. Why are they being given the rights of US citizens. They are terrorists, war criminals, and enemies of the state! We have had in place for soon to be 300 years methodology for dealing with war criminals, including a firing squad and hanging by the neck till dead without benefit of trial in US courts!

I think a perfect punishment for these men would be a firing squad made up of 72 of America's finest FEMALE sharpshooters. Swift, painless, and as merciful as it gets!
Reply to this comment
by 50BMS13 November 14, 2009 7:21 AM EST
Very bad for New York to have the bullseye painted on it again. This is a military issue not a criminal civilian issue. Now that Obama is trying to make this a civil matter rather than a war matter, these terrorists could get off. They have been waterboarded and god knows what else. If this is a war matter, big deal. Now that it is a civilian matter, their rights have been abused. Anything they have said or admitted to to date will be stricken from the court and not allowed as evidence. Obama himself exposed Bush's tactics for gaining info. What a mess this will turn out to be. Especially if they walk. One muslim lover and you have a hung jury. One paid off judge they walk. Everything has to go perfect to get a conviction. Remember O.J.?
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Gen. Ray Odierno, head of multinational forces in Iraq, on progress there and plans for Afghanistan. Watch Now

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER