Political Hotsheet
October 23, 2009 1:57 PM

A Busy Obama Finds Time for Fundraisers

(CBS)
President Obama is headlining a pair of fundraisers Friday: One for Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick and the other for Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd. Both Democrats are preparing for tough reelection campaigns – though it's worth noting that their actual elections won't be taking place for another year.

Earlier this week, the president spoke at fundraisers for the Democratic National Committee and for Congressional candidate Bill Owens. He's also headlining events designed to create buzz and donations for candidates in tough battles, including one this week for New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine and another next week for Virginia gubernatorial candidate Creigh Deeds.

To date, the president has done 23 fund-raising events since taking office, according to CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller. He has helped generate more than $24 million for the DNC and for specific candidates – and that's not including the figures from events where organizers declined to reveal how much money was raised.

If that seems like a lot of fundraisers for a president with an ambitious agenda and less than a year in office, that's because it is – at least compared to his predecessor. In President Bush's first year in office, Knoller reports, Mr. Bush did only six fund-raisers.

Yet Mr. Bush was able to generate substantially more money than Mr. Obama: he brought in more than $48 million from the six events, more than the current president has raised in nearly four times as many appearances.

At Thursday's briefing, White House press secretary offered an explanation for why the president has done so many more fundraisers than his predecessor.

"I'd remind you that campaign finance rules that were in place in 2001 allowed someone to write a check for an unlimited amount of money to a political party," Gibbs said. "Many did to both parties. So this president doesn't accept money from PACs, doesn't -- or doesn't accept money from PACs or lobbyists and doesn't allow lobbyists to give at fundraisers that he's at as well."

Gibbs is making two different points here. The first is that the rules have changed: President Bush's first year in office came before the 2002 passage of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform bill, which, among other things, did away with unlimited so-called "soft money" contributions. Under McCain-Feingold, parties can now accept a maximum of $28,500 per year from individuals and nothing from corporations or labor unions.

So while Mr. Bush could generate an unlimited amount of money for his party from each contributor during his first-year in office, Mr. Obama can't – something that has seriously limited how much money he could bring in at each event.

The other point Gibbs is making is that Mr. Obama is operating within his self-imposed rule against taking money from lobbyists or political action committees. It should be noted, however, that PACs still donate to Mr. Obama's party and to individual candidates, and that media outlets have questioned the president's self-proclaimed separation from lobbyist money.

Gibbs' claim that the president "doesn't allow lobbyists to give at fundraisers that he's at" isn't being taken at face value by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which on Friday called on the White House and Chris Dodd to release the names of the people attending the president's fundraiser for Dodd.

"If there are truly no lobbyists in attendance tonight then it should be simple for the White House and Dodd’s campaign to prove as much by simply sharing their guest list with voters," said NRSC spokeswoman Amber Wilkerson Marchand.
Tags:
obama ,
fundraisers
Topics:
Barack Obama
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 58 Comments
by pensacola8-2009 October 25, 2009 12:46 AM EDT
I never contributed to any political fund raiser until Barrack Obama ran for President. Now, I give give and give more. He is first candidate that I can honestly connect with and see the wonderful contents of his soul.

His wife Michelle is also a charming and charismatic person. I am not black, but I sure am proud of the Obamas and those in this country who gave the Obamas a chance to lead this country.

The GOP still has problems whitewashing every idea that pops in their limited and discriminating minds.

With Obama in office, I foresee some of the best times of my adult life possible and actually have hope that we can all hand down something wonderful to the next generation, such as health care.

I am also pleased with his recent handling of the latin artists he and Michelle recently hosted. They all danced and made history that has the the Latin World exploding with awe and respect for the USA, never seen in my life. His charisma has opened many doors for others to see more of the finest things the USA has to offer.

Long live the Obamas!! They are truly loved and respected by many!
Reply to this comment
by RespectMichael October 24, 2009 4:47 PM EDT
Here's the problem..He's busy..doing what? Pondering Afghanistan? Attacking News Media? Having Parties at the WH dancing..this guy is a joke..His only talent is reading a teleprompter..did you see the protesters in Stamford? OOps that's right this is CBS..they don't do negative press on Obama..
Reply to this comment
by faceofus October 24, 2009 2:37 PM EDT
This country is now in the worst recession since the Great Depression and it seems that the people of this country would be better served if Obama remained in the white house and spent his time working on a solution to this crisis.
Reply to this comment
by choptopford October 24, 2009 8:41 AM EDT
WHAT HE RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT INSTEAD OF RUNNING THE COUNTRY
Reply to this comment
by stryker54 October 24, 2009 2:31 AM EDT
It's nice to see our POTUS can do two things at the same time. 1st fundraise for his party to gain more control and 2nd run the country into the ground. What a great guy.
Reply to this comment
by barkl October 24, 2009 3:51 AM EDT
A great guy who wins the Nobel Peace Prize for breathing in and out
and making sure his Dem Party followers are re-elected!
by wdh3007 October 23, 2009 11:56 PM EDT
Enough about Bush he is gone no more blaming him for anything anymore when this fraud in chief acts more unpresidential everyday. The sad thing is he really believes he was put on this earth to do wonders when the country is going down the drain even more how pathetic.
Reply to this comment
by hammerheadblog October 23, 2009 11:42 PM EDT
If you enjoy parody and satire that shine a light on this joke of a president (and I know you do) check out some of these responses to his recent screw-ups:
The Olympics Debacle: http://wp.me/pChUJ-4Y
The "Barack Hussein Obama, Mm-mm-mm" public school hymn sing: http://wp.me/pChUJ-4a
Health Care: http://wp.me/pChUJ-u
The "Beer Summit": http://wp.me/pChUJ-1v
The influence that the science fiction subculture has had on the Obama administration:http://wp.me/pChUJ-4A
Reply to this comment
by pigsinlipstick October 23, 2009 7:29 PM EDT
I knew the right wing loons would find something else to crybaby about

what a bunch of anti american losers,


small wonder that only 19 percent of Americans want to be associated

with the joke that is the republiCON party
Reply to this comment
by writer10 October 23, 2009 10:41 PM EDT
true kassandra...ACORN needs money poste haste - if anyone is utterly anti American is' the pig above - he does nothing except make every effort to divide party lines and slam the right as often as possible, even if it's not a politically related story
by gomzee69 October 23, 2009 7:28 PM EDT
And GW NEVER held fundraisers, right?

Mental Midgets.
Reply to this comment
by pigsinlipstick October 23, 2009 7:48 PM EDT
they are fools, that is why only 20 percent of American call themselves conservative republi'CON's

they are all fools, anti american fools
by writer10 October 23, 2009 10:43 PM EDT
lolol...you are such an idiot...but entertaining none the less...by all means, carry on pig.
by chevyhotrod October 24, 2009 7:58 AM EDT
GW had six fundraisers in his first year in office. Obama 28????? How many speeches has he given?? Over 120???? What about comparing vacation you libs always complained about. This new president is a complete nit wit and the American people are finally waking up to the fact that they made a big mistake in electing someone that has not accomplish a single thing within his own life, except for writing two books that bash the very country that elected him president. LOL

You all should go back and see what GW approval ratings where at the same amount of time Obama has been in office. 88% & 89% percent.

http://www.pollingreport.com/BushJob1.htm

talk about mental midgets???? gomzee you are a joke and I am LMAO.
by borg99 October 23, 2009 7:00 PM EDT
Gee, Obama's fundraiser couldn't be because the Democrats are the party of the little guy, and therefore need to put out more energy finding lots of smaller donations, could it?

Unlike the GOP -- the party of big business and gullible rednecks -- which can collect a few fat checks from a few fatcats in exchange for rubber chicken and go home.

And don't give me that swill about union money floating the Dems -- the unions are at their lowest ebb, financially and otherwise, since 1932.
Reply to this comment
by pigsinlipstick October 23, 2009 7:28 PM EDT
they are all fools, the republi'con's and their conservative masters

would rather see America go down the toilet

then have democratic leadership

they are mindless Evangelical fools
by chevyhotrod October 24, 2009 8:05 AM EDT
hey pig,
you should go do some research and look at the unemployment numbers for 2002,03,04,05,06 (republican control) then go look at the unemployment numbers for 2006,07,08,09 (democrat control) and you will see the trend that is undeniable. Talking about going down the toilet?? You are a complete ignorate fool and our country is paying the price because of people like you. Want to know what happened with the finacial crisis? Follow the link below, you might actually learn something. CSPAN video from 2004 & 05.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4A0RuXhnQA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxMInSfanqg
by stn_sage October 23, 2009 6:55 PM EDT
Well, like it or not...it isn't illegal for him to go to fundraisers!

Certainly, Bush did when he was in office...and what's fair for one is fair for the other!

Personally, I don't care for the practice no matter WHO is doing it!!
But, that's politics!

He needs to get the fundraisers in now...because as his popularity continues to slide, in the future, he will be getting fewer and fewer requests to make appearances!
Reply to this comment
by chelokee October 23, 2009 5:41 PM EDT
www.yoeddie.com
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 23, 2009 5:18 PM EDT
by N-Y-Joe-11 October 23, 2009 4:47 PM EDT
There was vacation to Grand Canyon, Martha's vineyard, several Summits (vacations) to Europe, fundraisers for the Democrats, G6, G12, G500.....all after 8-9 months in office.....all have to have the mother-in-law joining them as well ? the wife, the kids, everyone needs to be at the summits ?







Since when are summits and G-20 and G-8 meetings considered to be vacation?

Once again your post is self deflating because of a lack of common sense.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 23, 2009 5:16 PM EDT
by N-Y-Joe-11 October 23, 2009 4:50 PM EDT
by hungry1968-16 October 23, 2009 4:36 PM EDT

I don't believe I was even on CBS during Bush presidency, so how you could "recall" that, is beyond me.....I would disagree with Bush doing partisan fundraisers.....The PResident is the president of both parties and shouldn't be campaigning, when there is such "messes" and dire issues to deal with.

Do you agree with my general premise that this is wrong ?






Of course I do. If the president is campaigning for a candidate, then that candidates election campaign should foot the bill for Air Force One, the security detail, etc.

But you WERE on these boards last year, and you NEVER once said a word about Bush going out and about campaigning for McCain, so I ask again:

Which is it -- short memory, selective outrage, or purely hypocritical?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 23, 2009 4:46 PM EDT
by Marc_1986 October 23, 2009 4:37 PM EDT
@hungry

So hosting foreign diplomats there doesn't count?

You consider anyone who operates a business out of their own home lazy?







So NOW your claim is that Bush ONLY WENT to Camp David, when there were dignitaries there?

Get a grip man - the guy was a washout, and didn't do ANYTHING positive for this country.

The BEST thing that he did, was to take so many days off. I wonder how many lives were saved because he abused his vacation privileges?
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 23, 2009 4:36 PM EDT
by N-Y-Joe-11 October 23, 2009 3:38 PM EDT
When a President is elected, he is the President of ALL Americans, both Democrat, Republican and Independent parties....we hired him to be President, not to be campaigning for the Democrats alone, while on the payroll.....

I trust he will be re-imbursing the Government for his partisan fund-raiser travel expenses and refund his income for the time spend doing the Democrats heavy lifting.

I believe a true honest Democrats would feel the same way, if the tables were turned and this was a Republican president, going around fund-raising for only Republicans







Funny, I don't recall you asking Bush to STOP campaigning on behalf of the republicans in 2002 and 2006.

So which is it -- short memory, selective outrage, or purely hypocritical?
Reply to this comment
by eightsigma October 23, 2009 4:41 PM EDT
The President needs to campaign for Democrats to help pass the agenda we elected him to pursue.
by rdepontb October 23, 2009 4:36 PM EDT
Dear Brian Montopoli,

Why do _you_ think he's doing fundraisers? Could it be the mid-term elections are coming up, that they are always risky for the incumbent's party, and that he wants to help the party as much as he can without political games? So what if he's at fundraisers?? What is it to you that he's loyal to his friends and party???

After reading your quite negative take on Obama's recent visit to New Orleans---you couldn't help but turn back to the story from the New Orleans Times-Picayune that compared Obama unfavorably to George W Bush!!!---well, after reading that story, it is clear where you're coming from. You do not belong at CBS News, home of William Paley, Edward Murrow, Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather. Period.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 October 23, 2009 4:34 PM EDT
by Marc_1986 October 23, 2009 4:25 PM EDT
@pubsrtoast

You're an idiot. Camp David is not vacation.






Camp David is the weekend retreat of the president.

Try to catch up.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_David#Presidential_use
Reply to this comment
by Marc_1986 October 23, 2009 4:37 PM EDT
@hungry

So hosting foreign diplomats there doesn't count?

You consider anyone who operates a business out of their own home lazy?
by jda1022 October 23, 2009 5:15 PM EDT
You're an idiot! Really! That's your idea of a debated? First time in my life I've gotten involved in something like this. Why? Because for the first time in my life I am ashamed of Americans. Not America, Americans. THIS IS NOT THE SUPERBOWL. This is our lives. Get past the ignorant particanship. You and others like you on this site and others are killing this country. Thanks from an idiot who believes both sides have a right to speak with these childish personal attacks.
by pickaguitar1 October 23, 2009 3:56 PM EDT
YES WE CAN!


I really hope someday President Obama's picture graces our currency.
Easily my favorite president.
Reply to this comment
by eightsigma October 23, 2009 4:38 PM EDT
Busy, busy... I wish Bush had "dithered" longer before sending troops to waste their blood in Iraq.
by pigsinlipstick October 23, 2009 7:53 PM EDT
better to be a communist then a republi'CON' these days

you should look up communism in good encyclopedia. It is

far better then the fascism that is conservatism
by enterr October 23, 2009 3:54 PM EDT
Does the fund-raisers pick up the bill that it cost for him to go or does the tax payers??
Reply to this comment
by tmittelstaed October 23, 2009 4:21 PM EDT
I;'d assume that he does the exact same thing that Bush Jr. and Sr. and Ronnie Raygun did, which is let the taxpayers pay the bill. As a taxpayer, I'll be more than happy to criticize Obama spending my money on fundraising, when the Republican officeholders repay all of their travel expenses to the taxpayers. I understand Palin still owes the McCain campaign for her hillbilly raid on the clothing stores, to say nothing of the Alaskan taxpayers.
See all 58 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER