Econwatch
September 25, 2009 1:06 PM

Big Banks' Sneaky New Tricks


This post by Kathy Kristof originally appeared on CBS' MoneyWatch.com.



Erik Weech learned about sneaky banking polices the hard way.

A few weeks ago, Bank of America hit the Chicago marketing man with a $35 overdraft fee when he had more than $130 in his account. The bank was apparently "holding" his money for charges that hadn't cleared - only they appear to have been holding three times more than he actually spent. Then, if that wasn't enough, they "reordered" his subsequent purchases in a way that tripled his overdraft charges. Within a couple days, he had racked up $140 in fees.

Authorization holds and transaction reordering are among the banking practices taking increasing heat recently from both consumers and lawmakers. Although nickel-and-dime fees are pervasive - just check your cable bill - the big financial institutions have become poster children for customer abuse. With direct access to your cash, they have developed a range of sneaky tricks that can quickly whittle down your account.

(IStockPhoto)
Use your credit card and you’re likely to find that they’ve hiked your interest rate, perhaps switching it from a fixed-rate to a variable. Don’t use your card and you could get hit with an inactivity fee. Fail to fix an overdraft promptly and you could get hit with a zero balance fee — in addition to overdraft charges. Flee the bank and they’re likely to slap you with an exit fee.

“Consumers would be shocked at how many different tricks the regulators allow banks to use to take money out of their wallets,” said Ed Mierzwinski, consumer services projects director at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group in Washington. “As long as the banks disclose in the small print that they are going to rob you, it’s legal to rob you.”

Authorization Holds


The trick that some consumers consider the sneakiest involves so-called authorization holds. These are for debit card purchases that haven’t yet cleared. Sometimes they’re for the amount you spent, but they can be for considerably more.

Consider Weech’s tale of woe. He had $130 in his account on August 31, the same day that the bank inexplicably hit him with a $35 overdraft fee. How did he get charged for an overdraft when he had money in his account? After hours of inquiries, he finally got an explanation of sorts — a vendor placed a hold on the funds in his account, but the hold appears to be for considerably more than he spent. He got no warning from the vendor. He said there also wasn’t any indication that the funds he saw in his account weren’t available for his use.

“The bank tells you that you should be using a check register and keeping track of your account — but how do you keep track of that?” he asked.

Bank of America spokeswoman Anne Pace says situations like Weech’s happen when consumers use their debit cards with particular vendors — commonly at hotels, gas stations, and car rental agencies that often freeze far more than you actually charged. The biggest culprits are hotels — they wouldn’t charge your credit card for your stay until you leave, but if you use a debit card, the desk clerk will put a hold on your account for the full cost of your reservation, plus some estimated amount for incidentals, like using the mini-bar and charging meals to your room.

Bank of America blames the merchants for not disclosing the holds and for holding too much: Pace says BofA’s debit card agreements warn customers about the chance that these holds could cause overdrafts. What she doesn’t say: That same debit card agreement also says the bank doesn’t have to honor that hold if it thinks the amount is an estimate.



Reordering Transactions


Weech’s hold was cleared by the next day, but he soon hit another problem. He made three purchases — one of which, late in the day, pushed him into a legitimate overdraft. But the bank reordered the three charges from largest to smallest, emptying the account faster and ensuring that each subsequent charge would incur yet another $35 fee, he said.

Reordering your checks and debit transactions to withdraw for the largest items first — regardless of when each transaction occurred — is a common practice among the nation’s biggest banks. Bankers say it’s a service to customers, ensuring that your most important payments, such as your mortgage, don’t bounce.

Bunk, said Weech. “They paid all the charges,” he said. “If they’re going to pay everything, the only reason for reordering is to charge more fees.”

Some big banks are starting to get the message — encouraged, perhaps, by the threat of legislative action. Chase, for instance, recently announced an end to reordering; it will now credit the transactions chronologically. And Chase, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo said they would trim overdraft fees and give customers more options on overdraft protection.

But even if those changes become more widely accepted, they would come too late for Mark Elliot, a 45-year-old city planner. Last Christmas, US Bank charged a $37.50 overdraft fee at a time that he had more than $170 in his account, he said. By reordering the subsequent transactions — delaying a $90 credit and accelerating a $116 charge — the bank managed to levy $140 in overdraft charges. They then stuck him for 11 daily zero balance fees when he didn’t quickly fix the overdraft.

“It’s crazy,” he said. “They told me that they can post transactions in any order they like. It systematically disadvantages the customer.”

Both banks eventually refunded a few of the fees, but both consumers said they felt unjustly ripped off. Elliot filed a complaint with bank regulators. Weech started searching for class action attorneys.

But the real problem may be that they both used debit cards. Although banks maintain debit transactions are like writing checks but without the paperwork, access to your funds doesn’t get frozen the moment you write a check. Quite the opposite.

Stealth Credit Card Fees


Using a credit card has gotten treacherous, too, said Gerri Detweiler, consultant with Credit.com. That’s because a vast number of issuers have changed rates and terms in anticipation of a new consumer protection law coming in February. But many of these disclosures are in statement stuffers that consumers consider junk mail and just throw away.

Among those changes are new annual fees, some of which only kick in when your account is “inactive” — in other words, when you haven’t charged enough.

Balance transfer and foreign transaction fees are also on the rise. Balance transfer fees, once 2 percent to 3 percent, are now hitting 4 percent and 5 percent, said Bill Hardekopf, founder of LowCards.com.

And foreign transaction fees — essentially a service charge to do business with a foreign retailer — are typically 3 percent of the amount you charge (or take out of an ATM) when overseas. These fees don’t pay for currency conversion, bankers say. That’s charged separately. Worse, said Detweiler, foreign transaction fees are now being levied on U.S. consumers buying goods and services in the U.S., but from a foreign vendor. Watch what you buy on Amazon.co.uk.

Exit Fees


So let’s say you’ve had enough and you’ve decided to flee your bank for friendlier environs. “A new trend among banks is to charge you if you transfer money to other banks,” said Joe Ridout, consumer services manager at Consumer Action in San Francisco.

For instance, Bank of America charges $50 if you want to move your IRA to another institution. U.S. Bank levies a $30 fee. “The fees are common practice in the industry,” said Matt Case, a Bank of America spokesman.

There’s no charge to transfer money in, of course.

Says Ridout: “When you don’t charge to bring money in, but you charge to send it out, the bank turns into a roach motel, where your money checks in, but doesn’t check out.”

More on MoneyWatch:
Lawmakers Race to Roll Out New Bank Rules
Pending Overdraft Rules Prompt Banks to Cut Fees
Banks Forcing Consumers into Overdrafts
Analysis: We Need Plans to Break Up Biggest Banks
Can Shareholders Take Revenge at Bank of America?
Tags:
Bank of America ,
transactions ,
debit card ,
credit card ,
late fees ,
hidden fees ,
authorization holds ,
Wells Fargo ,
Chase ,
banks
Topics:
CBS News Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by zippiez September 29, 2009 10:15 AM EDT
This must be the "free market system" that you blankey-blank conservatives love so much.
Reply to this comment
by dragon8me September 28, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
This is a good example of capitolism run amock. This is exactly why the gov should be running the banking system. This is why the federal reserve needs to be abolished and our money put back in the hands of the people instead of the privately owned federal reserve bank.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 September 27, 2009 9:55 PM EDT
Why in the F would ANYONE use Bank of America with their history of BS and shady practices, deceptive loans, etc, etc, etc?

If everyone would just bail out on the very biggest banks, and go with the smaller banks (like I use - M&T) or credit unions, then the biggest banks would be financially "bent over a barrel", and these practices would stop instantly.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-16 September 27, 2009 9:50 PM EDT
And yet everyone sits here and defends "capitalism" as the greatest system in the world, the most beneficial system for America and it's citizens, and defend all of it's worst practices - like the subject of this story.

Every bank in the country needs to be regulated to hilt.

F 'em.
Reply to this comment
by rational_1 September 27, 2009 3:31 PM EDT
Want to avoid the exit fee? Stop using that account for a month or so with your debit card, and then withdraw all but a couple of bucks from the account. Then ignore the account forever while you put your money elsewhere. Any reason why this wouldn't work?
Reply to this comment
by jackp32 September 27, 2009 3:07 PM EDT
Let's all go back to yesteryear and start putting our money in a mattress and throw out the cut up credit cards.
Reply to this comment
by get_down September 27, 2009 12:13 PM EDT
My take to deal with any financial institutions - including banks - is once I found out that anyone of them is engaging in some semi-honest - i.e. dishonest - transaction(s) with my assets - I'll terminate their services for good and get on the World Wide Web (Internet) to broadcast their 15 minutes of shame! And that's a promise - you can take that to the bank - eh - the honest ones of course!
Reply to this comment
by bciss September 26, 2009 12:59 PM EDT
The lines in this article that sum up best what the banking industry thinks of us. Would be the one stating "it's ok to rob us as long as they tell us" of course in the micro fine print of the eighty paragraph "terms". The other would be when the author points out a blatant lie of omission from a bank spokesperson.

"Bank of America blames the merchants for not disclosing the holds and for holding too much: Pace says BofA?s debit card agreements warn customers about the chance that these holds could cause overdrafts. What she doesn?t say: That same debit card agreement also says the bank doesn?t have to honor that hold if it thinks the amount is an estimate."

Those two things are a pretty fair representation of how they think. The spokesperson who I am sure was charming and sincere sounding. Well gee golly the terms do say this could happen. Knowing full well they write the asinine things to be nearly unreadable or clear to the vast majority of people. Then whip out a lil gem that suits her purpose and justification from said terms. Only to leave out what would clearly actually be useful to the average consumer. A way to possibly push back on unreasonable holds and avoid unreasonable fees. But of course that would not rip of the average people who are just swimming in cash these days anyway. But might actually keep the bank on honest and perhaps even helpful terms, but not unduly enrich their bottom line for not actually providing a service. It does however facilitating a round about, but technically legal theft.

It is so nice that we have the banks to hold our money hostage and think up all kinds of adorable legal ways to part us from it for no good reason. While at the same time a super fantastic government which basically held up the entire nation to bail out these financial monsters for their crimes. Which they benefit from and we pay for and so will our children, etc. While their children will inherit the park avenue penthouse and palm beach mansion bought with hi jacked money.

When I say government that includes both parties as they are just two sides of the same coin. One plays bad cop while the other plays good cop. Depending on who is in supposed power at the time. But real policy and the things they do, NEVER, EVER change. Except it seems for the worst. Which is why it is so sad to repeatedly see people continue to scream liberal or conservative at each other or defend Bush or Obama. Look I wanted change too. But people need to face facts and see there are no meat and taters of actual change. The excuse of he's new is wearing more then a little thin. Obama is Bush light, which is ironic all things considered.

The issue really lies in the fact we do not actually have a representative government. They give lip service. They sometimes create shows to distract. But for all intensive purposes we have become a corporateocracy.

Big companies and big banks, have a strangle hold on or government and until people on a whole recognize it and demand change. Which frankly would be astoundingly easy with no violent revolution needed. Withdraw our support. Refuse to allow the game to go on. If they know people are actually paying attention and will call BS where there is an ocean of it? Then they will change to save their own necks.

Until the day people on a whole quit hissing and spitting at each other over some social issue, etc. Begin to focus on what is actually being done to our very way of life. That has nothing at all to do with, gays getting married or health care, etc. Stop letting every politician and big money interest further line their pockets off the backs of the American people, they are certain are too stupid to notice. Well,, until that happens? We will continue to decline and our lives and freedoms will continue to be intruded upon and curtailed. It is not pleasant but it is a fact. That will be our future. Until that blows up in everyone's face and then I really don't want to think about what this country or world might become. We are on that path though and to deny it is willful ignorance and will do no good.

People need to pay attention and look beyond just the MSM to tell you what is going on. Check actual congressional voting records and laws. Step to some alt respectable news sources with factual and complete, not one sided or skewed info. That is not to say there is no factual info in MSM. It is however incredibly naive to think it is not often manipulated and skewed. Check everything get all sides and it is shocking. But an ugly truth is better then a pretty lie. You can not fix what you do not realize is wrong.
Reply to this comment
by nostraden September 26, 2009 6:04 AM EDT
They did the same to me a few years ago,They let checks go through 5 Times and bounce 1.00 Checks,I went to them the next day and asked them to CLose or Block the account,They refused.SO they Charged me like 800.00 in fees and guess WHAT ? Their not gonna get it..........They Lie,The Cheat and I heard ther one of the MANY DRUG LAUNDERING BANKS in AMERICA
Reply to this comment
by realist51 September 25, 2009 9:51 PM EDT
I agree credit unions are the best. I haven't dealt with a bank in 30 years, never had problems with a credit union. member owned and the boards are ususally elected from the membership. they do charge fee's though, And i didn't hear of any credit unions being bailed out ,to large to fail, or having extremely high ceo salaries and bonuses being paid out. throw a wrench ther way is right go down close your accounts at the bank and join a credit union. If you have one at work thats even better.
Reply to this comment
by ibsteve2u September 25, 2009 8:10 PM EDT
We're in trouble, I think. Now we've got Fed governor Kevin Warsh advocating not using indicators like GDP or unemployment - those indicators that show how much pain the American people are in - when making policy decisions.

Instead, according to Warsh, policy should be driven by indicators like watching the financial markets, asset prices, and risk premiums.

Pretty cool, eh? Just shove the American people aside, and make all policy decisions based upon how fast those who are wealthy enough to participate in the financial markets are accumulating more wealth.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 September 25, 2009 8:55 PM EDT
You do have a very valid point regarding the "measure of pain", but since the numbers have been cooked for decades, and not really indicative of the true state of the economy, their usefulness can be questioned.

Today's unemployment figures don't count those who have exhausted their unemployment benefits, or who haven't been able to find work for an extended period, the true unemployment rate is estimated by the bureau of labor statistics at almost 19%, and even they undercount.

The GDP is also subject to the "Bill Gates effect" counting him, and other mega-rich CEOs as part of GDP distorts the reality of the figure, as it is not he who is actually producing.

The statistics given to the public are generally lies told by the administration of the time, to either support an initiative, or discourage one.

If we all refuse to participate in the financial markets, use targeted boycotts of insurance firms and financial services firms, until they are driven out of business, and simply refuse to pay the prices asked for assets, we can throw a wrench into the plan to regard piles of money as more important than humanity.

Let them peg, say, Merrill Lynch as a bellweather, then let's boycott M.L., until it is just a memory.
by bosunj September 25, 2009 7:11 PM EDT
FU Capitalism! ain't it grand! Time to roll out the guillotines!
Reply to this comment
by Void_Master September 25, 2009 5:12 PM EDT
Credit unions are Ok to a point but they're small enough to get a little weird too.

Small local banks tend to be the best and safest way to go. They're in pretty good shape financially and observe business practices far superior to those of the "big boys." That's how they kept going while the giants were tripping over their own greed.
Reply to this comment
by Void_Master September 25, 2009 5:09 PM EDT
I use only a local bank. Credit unions are Ok to a point but they're small enough to get a little weird too. Most small, locally owned banks are in good shape financially and have business practices far superior to the "big boys." It how they kept going while the giants were busy tripping over their own greed.
Reply to this comment
by eferrell2 September 25, 2009 3:47 PM EDT
Exactly! Perhaps these people that keep getting ripped off are banking with the wrong organizations. I have been with a Credit Union for many years now, and none of this has ever happened to me.
Reply to this comment
by mjvwsr September 25, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
can anyone say credit union. why anyone deals with the monster banks is beyond me
Reply to this comment
by fiberglass3 September 26, 2009 11:47 AM EDT
We bail the banks out, only to help them overcharge us. I don't get it ??
by dragon8me September 28, 2009 9:17 AM EDT
fiberglass3 September 26, 2009 11:47 AM EDT
We bail the banks out, only to help them overcharge us. I don't get it ??
------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's because the Federal Reserve bank is a privately owned bank. Owned by international banking families. They are the ones you hear tell of when they talk about a "shadow government". It's time to quit "renting" our own money from these thieves who back our money with debt. If we, the people and government, were out of debt there would be no money in circulation.
Watch;
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2550156453790090544&ei=8LbASrvHDoeOrALU3NTWBg&q=money+as+debt&hl=en#
and
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3203253804055041031&ei=LbfASpLHIZ-arAK09rHkBg&q=the+corporation&hl=en#
See all 19 Comments

About Econwatch

News and analysis on the state of the economy from CBS News.

E-Mail EconWatch

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn