Political Hotsheet
September 9, 2009 10:02 AM

Obama Still Working on Health Care Speech

(AP Photo/Kirsty Wiggl)
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters on Air Force One this morning that President Obama has not yet put the finishing touches on his planned address this evening to a joint session of Congress.

"He's still working on it," Gibbs said. "…he came back from Camp David Monday with many handwritten pages of notes that he gave to the speechwriters. He got another draft incorporating more edits last night, and worked on it with the speechwriters before he left this morning. So my sense is he'll be tinkering with this some this afternoon, but my sense is this thing will be locked sometime this afternoon."

Gibbs also spoke of Mr. Obama's "main goals" in the address, which he said are "to speak clearly to the American people about what's in health care reform; for those that are fortunate to have insurance, to demonstrate for them that his plan will bring them security and stability; and for those that don't have health insurance, that we'll provide an affordable way for them to get accessible insurance."

In an interview on ABC's "Good Morning America" today, the president blamed himself for leaving "too much ambiguity out there" on his health care plan, reports CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller.

Mr. Obama said ambiguity in his plan allowed "opponents of reform to come in and to fill up the airwaves with a lot of nonsense."

That nonsense, he said, includes the "ridiculous idea that we were setting up death panels" or providing health insurance to illegal immigrants.

Asked about the political climate, Mr. Obama said "there is still just this unyielding partisanship. In some ways, I think it's gotten worse."
Tags:
Obama ,
Speech ,
Health Care ,
Congress
Topics:
Health Care
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 43 Comments
by freefall7 September 9, 2009 5:21 PM EDT
A few comments.

"Since World War II, federal spending has generally remained between 18 and 22 percent of GDP. During the Bush Administration, spending increased from 18 to 21 percent of GDP. This year, President Obama will spend a peacetime-record 26 percent of GDP. Even by 2019, spending would still be 23 percent of GDP--not even counting the President's proposed health plan." (source: The Heritage Foundation, http://www.heritage.org/research/budget/wm2595.cfm)

Please read the article, and tell me how this kind of spending is sustainable. Pesident Obama, President Bush, and Congress have rung up a massive debt (Obama's debt, shockingly, even greater than the Bush disaster, and Obama has yet to be in office for one year). On top of all this spending (some deemed "necessary" to save the economy, some bona fide pork waste--under both parties), the Democrats propose a healthcare plan that will cost another trillion dollars! Whether such spending is "necessary" or not, it will bankrupt the country--an outcome we must not take lightly.

Republicans and Conservatives have put out several healthcare bills and reform proposals. Some proposals include: the use of medical savings accounts, increasing competition by letting Americans buy insurance accross state lines, eliminating some harsh regulations of insurance companies to allow Americans to pick and choose their plans more freely, allowing Americans to buy health insurance individually (without the involvement of their employers), reforming tort, and providing catastrophic insurance for those too poor to afford it. These things could help reduce healthcare costs AND help the uninsured find affordable insurance.

There are even clinics like Qliance where insurance companies take a back seat. "Qliance customers pay $99 to join, then a flat monthly rate of $39 to $119, depending on age and level of service. Patients can quit without notice and no one is rejected for pre-existing conditions." (source: Reuters, http://www.reuters.com/article/smallBusinessNews/idUSTRE5660N620090707) Pateints only need to buy catastrophic insurance from an outside source. Systems like this could, perhaps, lower healthcare costs and frustration in the system. Apparently Qliance has been doing quite well, meaning people are satisfied with it.

Finally, please read this wonderful article which contains several sensible approaches to healthcare reform:
online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204251404574342170072865070.html


This should not be a Democrat vs. Republican issue. There are plenty of creative ideas around to help reduce cost and protect the uninsured without involving bloated government bureaucracy and further inflating a dangerously large government debt.
Reply to this comment
by maakahill September 9, 2009 4:38 PM EDT
I hope his both of his tele-promter crashes to floor in a million pieces, then maybe he might speak truthfully, otherwise more of the same...
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman September 9, 2009 4:33 PM EDT
by CORALRIDGE September 9, 2009 4:25 PM EDT
STOP SOCIALIZED HEATLH CARE PETITIONS!!!



what is "heatlh"?
Reply to this comment
by reveal5 September 9, 2009 3:27 PM EDT
Congress people pay for individual insurance plans from a menu of private options. Congress people receive a partial subsidization of their health insurance costs paid for by the taxpayer. Private businesses also partially subsidize the costs of their employees private sector insurance.
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman September 9, 2009 3:13 PM EDT
by ImpeachTheSocialists September 9, 2009 3:08 PM EDT
The loony-left d-crat socialist still don't get it!

The American people have made their view known: NO MEAN NO on government nationalization of the American healthcare industry and its replacement with a $1 TRILLION government-controlled, limited and rationed heathcare system.





A few town hall loonies DO NOT represent the American people! Obama was elected to fix this issue, among many others. He is doing what the AMERICAN PEOPLE elected him to do.
Reply to this comment
by kevjustice September 9, 2009 2:57 PM EDT
Why not do this using two bills. The first bill would have the 90% both sides say they agree on. The second bill would be the disputed stuff(public option).
Reply to this comment
by kevjustice September 9, 2009 2:54 PM EDT
Fellow Democrats: You do not need to hit a grand slam. I would settle for a home run. Any reasonable bill would be a significant improvement.
Reply to this comment
by CornetMustich September 9, 2009 2:44 PM EDT
And speaking of a national health program for all of us, lets end the 8 8 costly years of wars of choice, and bail-outs for the casinos on Wall St too.
Reply to this comment
by CornetMustich September 9, 2009 2:42 PM EDT
It's time for Medicare for All Americans.

See HR 676. Conyers-Kucinich

It's good for society and good for business too.

http://www.pnhp.org - Physicians for a National Health Program

And it's time for us to join the rest of the industrialized and civilized world.
Reply to this comment
by reveal5 September 9, 2009 2:22 PM EDT
Major corporations spend millions of dollars to gain subsidies and tax breaks from Congress paid for by the taxpayer. These same corporate entities now rally folks against socialism. These major corporations fight for socialism for themselves and fight against socialism for the taxpayer. Medicare seniors receive almost 3 times the benefits from Medicare as they have paid in. These seniors fight for socialism for themselves and against socialism for anyone else. Corporate America and Medicare seniors are fighting for social subsidies for themselves and are fighting against social subsidies for everyone else.
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman September 9, 2009 2:04 PM EDT
by Royal_Majesty September 9, 2009 2:00 PM EDT
Wyotuor ... How could anyone support government controlled health care ???


Glad to hear you will refuse Medicare in retirement! Good for you!
Reply to this comment
by incog-nito September 9, 2009 2:03 PM EDT
The GOP's "Patient's Choice Act" is a joke. Instead of focusing on group plans to take advantage of economies of scale and bargaining leverage to lower costs, it focuses on tax credits for people to buy individual policies, which are outrageously expensive in the first place. Not only they're expensive, but individual policies leave people vulnerable to capricious rate increases or denial of coverage, with little recourse in disputing the insurers. This is the exact opposite of what should be done to lower costs and expand coverage to more people. It's nothing more than a direct taxpayer-funded payout to the insurers, who will simply increase their premiums to soak up the tax credits. Of course they neglect to mention how to pay for these tax credits.
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman September 9, 2009 1:57 PM EDT
by Wyotour September 9, 2009 1:46 PM EDT

Beck and Limbaugh have NO power compared to the Government.






They control millions of low IQ followers. That is power.
Reply to this comment
by nubiangent09 September 9, 2009 1:26 PM EDT
If anyone ever been to a hospital emergency room, they would probably understand why health care reform is necessary. The fact, that folks wait hours to get seen by a doctor who does not fix what ails them. The patient gets the bill for $1,000, but the doctor only referred them to specialist and gave them some perscription which last a week.
Reply to this comment
by troutfishyman September 9, 2009 1:21 PM EDT
The CEO of Aetna earned $24,000,000 last year in total compensation.

And you are looking to those guys to fix the spiraling cost of health care? LOL!
Reply to this comment
by nubiangent09 September 9, 2009 1:20 PM EDT
The No Party are those who are immortal, never get sick, or just outright ignorant. When someone goes to emergency room, and register ask....." do you have insurance....... who pays for the care" When some gets in a car accident (heaven forbid, and they have no insurance, who pays for the emergency care? When someone has heartattack at work, where ever and he or she has no insurance, (who pays for it). If you have health insurance and you shell out 200.00 per month but never use it, but when you need to see a specialist... and you have to pay.......that copay which is almost 100.00, and you and your family have to think about food or seeing a specialist, what do you do..... If you have insurance and you need surgery and you got some test done, but the same test need to be done over and over again b/c doctors dont share information, guest what, you are stuck with the bill.

When your grandparents are forced to go into a medicare subsidized hospice, who pays...... When your parents have outrageous health care bills and they have decide if little timmy have to endure the pain b/c its too costly to get that surgery, what do you do. When you got dropped for your insurer and lose your job after 20 years, you get a new job and coverage is twice as high, what do you do?

When you had a pre-existing condiiton and you have to state that on the new policy, and the insurer denis your coverage? What do you do?

Oppositon to health care reform are folks who never had to struggle or incapable of understanding what is going around them. I see why the GOP preys on states where the average citizen didnt attend college and the average wages are under 50k, its because they are ignorant.
Reply to this comment
by the74blaster September 9, 2009 1:10 PM EDT
It's very simple for all the school children out there. How can you tell when a republican is telling whoppers about healthcare reform?

Thier lips are moving!

The truth is their opposition to a public option is they want us to pay more and recieve less health insurance coverage.

Its all about maintaining the obscene profits for these companies so they can pay the top level executives millions and line the pockets of their investors with our money.

Wake up America! Its time to do whats best for the people! Lets support the pubic option because it reduces our out of pocket expenditures for insurance using competition!

Do yourself a favor and take care of your best interests.

Does anyone actually believe the big insurance companies really care about the little guy?
Reply to this comment
by woeisme1 September 9, 2009 12:39 PM EDT
The only good thing about hangin' with a republican theses days is that it allows you to park in a handicapped zone.
Reply to this comment
by fiberglass3 September 9, 2009 12:35 PM EDT
We elected President Obama by a majority. We will support him on his health care plan by a majority also.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar6 September 9, 2009 12:50 PM EDT
Don't include me in your "we".
by akc4news September 9, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
My whole family is the reason for real health care reform. My husband is a lung cancer survior, a daughter who is bipolar, a grandaughter that is autistic and no insurance.I worry the most for my grandaughter who will be here after we are gone, who will take care of her?Please, to whomever will listen please reform the system now!!
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar6 September 9, 2009 12:39 PM EDT
People get sick...it's a fact of life.

Worry for your Granddaughter should only result in your, or your family's inability to prepare her to deal with the problems and pitfalls that life has in store for her...it's NOT a relection on how well or how poorly the Government will care for her!
See all 43 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER