Political Hotsheet
July 27, 2009 4:49 PM

CDC Chief: Soda Tax Could Combat Obesity

(AP)
While Democrats await the results of bipartisan negotiations over health care reform in the Senate Finance Committee, one of the proposals put before the committee received a nod of approval from health officials today: taxing soda.

The committee -- the last congressional panel expected to produce its own recommendations for health care reform -- listened to arguments earlier this year both for and against imposing a three-cent tax on sodas as well as other sugary drinks, including energy and sports drinks like Gatorade.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that a three-cent tax would generate $24 billion over the next four years, and proponents of the tax argued before the committee that it would lower consumption of sugary drinks and improve Americans' overall health.

At the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's "Weight of the Nation" conference today, CDC chief Dr. Thomas Freiden said increasing the price of unhealthy foods "would be effective" at combating the nation's obesity problem, reports CBS News chief political consultant Marc Ambinder.

Freiden said he was not endorsing the tax as a member of the administration but was "just presenting the science," according to Ambinder. He also said policies that would reduce the cost of healthy foods would effectively bring down obesity rates.

Obesity-related health spending reaches $147 billion a year, double what it was nearly a decade ago, according to a study published Monday by the journal Health Affairs.

Given that evidence, the argument goes, a soda tax could plausibly pay for health care reform both by raising revenues and bringing down the medical expenses associated with obesity.

"It is extremely difficult in reality to make such a snapshot estimate of something so complicated as obesity," Ambinder notes. "This is one reason why researchers in the field tend to focus on suffering and disparities within populations, rather than aggregate cost."

Even though the growth rates of American obesity are leveling off overall, he points out, the rate is not slowing among African American women, Hispanics, Native Americans, or among poorer Americans.

Those opposed to the soda tax, however, are also emphasizing the impact it could have on poor Americans. The American Beverage Association, which strongly opposes the tax, told the Wall Street Journal the tax would hit poor Americans the hardest.

The association announced this month it has formed a coalition called Americans Against Food Taxes to oppose the soda tax, the Hill newspaper reported. Made up of 110 organizations opposed to raising taxes on food and beverages to pay for health reform, the group is running an advertisement that shows a family enjoying soda on a camping trip.

Given the current state of the economy, the ad says, "this is no time for Congress to be adding taxes on the simple pleasures we all enjoy."
Tags:
Soda Tax ,
CDC ,
Obesity
Topics:
Health Care
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 198 Comments
by YodaSan2 September 18, 2009 2:57 PM EDT
I'am a bigger person myself, but I am the way I'am BECAUSE of just the lack of exercise, not poor eating habits...mostly! I AGREE on the soda tax. Yay for taxes!
Reply to this comment
by Sonyaandfamily September 12, 2009 12:51 AM EDT
Why not put labels on the bottles like there are on packs of cigs. "Soda has no nutritional value" "Soda can lead to obisity"....
Reply to this comment
by lazypeople August 28, 2009 8:32 PM EDT
All these lazy smoking, fatty, sugar pumping comments reflect the single most important cause of healthcare costs in the world. Lung cancer, heart disease and diabetes are the cause of millions of dollars of health costs, and people who have no insurance or not enough insurance dump this into their system daily. People have this immature self-righteous ego that feels entitled to do whatever you want with yourself whenever you please, like a 5 year-old kid in a play-pen. If you cant pay for your lung cancer, you heart attack or your obesity and diabetes, chronic renal failure or liver transplant, stop cramming this junk down your throat. Taxes are a short-fix, but its the people who eat this junk that need to grow-up.
Reply to this comment
by jkorun July 30, 2009 11:22 PM EDT
This proposal is absurd. The problem with sugary drinks and obesity is one of excess consumption, not the item being consumed. How about an obesity tax on potatoes, rice, nachos, ice cream, cookies? It makes no sense whatsoever to single out sugary drinks. Stupid, stupid, stupid!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt July 30, 2009 3:51 PM EDT
I think lard-***** wil pay 3 more cents a serving, myself.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti July 30, 2009 3:22 PM EDT
Darn, if we tax bad things like soda to help protect the people's health, we might soon have speed limits, traffic signs, public police and fire services and other such socialist things.
Reply to this comment
by WingedWolfPsion July 30, 2009 3:09 PM EDT
This seems entirely fair to me. It's a very tiny amount of money, and if it would be put to use for medical care, I don't see any reason why not. This is not a necessity of life--it's a luxury item, and it's one that shouldn't be used to excess. An extra 3 cents a day, if you drank a soda every day, would come out to a whopping $10.80 per year. Woo hoo.

Reducing the cost of healthy food is something that NEEDS to happen. If healthy food doesn't cost less than junk food, people are going to eat the junk food instead. That's not the way it's supposed to work. There's something seriously wrong with the way things are going currently--manufacturing healthy foods should cost LESS, not more.

If the only way to turn that around is to make the junk food more expensive...well, that's what should be done, then. No one is going to starve because of it, and the poor folks deprived of their yummy sodas may complain, but they'll be better off too. This country's addiction to junk food has gone too far, if a tax of a mere 3 cents on a soda looks like it will break the bank.
Reply to this comment
by alien_view July 30, 2009 2:37 PM EDT
It's not about the sugar or the salt. It is about more money more power. Do you really think they care about skinny or fat...no it more about money, power and control over the public in every aspect they can come up with to control you and your life.
Reply to this comment
by Joe_NY_15 July 30, 2009 2:34 PM EDT
by slownewsday_05 July 30, 2009 1:07 PM EDT

They deleted your comment about, the alternative to Obama, for some reason and my message responding...i guess any mention of dying is taboo at cbs
Reply to this comment
by Joe_NY_15 July 30, 2009 2:35 PM EDT
Sorry, my bad..still there
by Joe_NY_15 July 30, 2009 2:30 PM EDT
Does this cover all Soda or just sugary ones? because Obese people order big macs and a diet coke.....skinny people guzzle the sugar cokes....so as always, the Liberal establishment "knows better then you do about your own health" so they find new ways to tax the middle class....do you think wealthy people will be affected by a soda tax? NO, poor and middle class will have to pay.

Stop the madness !!! NOW (or send them a message in 2010)
Reply to this comment
by alien_view July 30, 2009 2:27 PM EDT
Sorry, I left out a new Liberal tax that one of my friends spoke of. It is the Salt tax. Since most doctors in the health care industry say we all need to cut down on salt in our diets because it causes very expensive heart and vascular conditions, more so than sugar. So be aware that the Salt Tax is next on this Obama Admin agenda. Carbonated drinks will get hit twice, look at the label and see how much salt along with sugar are in the can.
Reply to this comment
by alien_view July 30, 2009 2:22 PM EDT
END Obesity! Reduce the Federal Government and the IRS and leave us the He** alone to live our own lives. Next they will be taxing us a methane tax when we purchase items giving us gas. Then tax us with the CO2 tax when we purchase gasX. You liberals like being taxed so much just sign over your pay checks to the fed, if you still have a job. Oh, thats right you don't pay taxes just like your Congressmen. Everyone else is supposed to pay taxes including this BS Sugar Tax.
Reply to this comment
by IamAlonaLee July 30, 2009 1:29 PM EDT
I am just suprised that Washington isn't sending us a bill with a surcharge for breathing the air... this is just another moment of stupidity for the a-wholes who have nothing better to do than .. like solve our economic problems ... oh wait... taxing my Mt.Dew is going to solve the countries economic woes... ROFL ... Why don't we have term limits on those old farts???
Reply to this comment
by Joe_NY_15 July 30, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
Perfect example of what you will get, with Obama control over your lives, control over your health, your medicine, what you eat, drink, what you will drive, what you can borrow$, how much carbon, etc.

DO YOU WANT THE OBAMA SOCIALIST FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAVING EVERY AMERICAN'S MEDICAL RECORDS ?

We warned you about the dangers of irresponsibly electing a totally unqualified community organizer amateur radical liberal....bad news for America
Reply to this comment
by Joe_NY_15 July 30, 2009 2:08 PM EDT
by slownewsday_05 July 30, 2009 1:09 PM EDT

He's going to be in the Senate for another decade or two, and you thought he would die in office ? I bet you guys are thinking how rediculous that whole 'age' concern was.....Do you worry about Biden having another Brain Anneurism ? he's had several already...of course not....look at cheney, he has heart machines and he's still kickin
by endurorob July 30, 2009 10:21 AM EDT
CDC Chief "Soda tax will put another nail in the coffin of personal freedom.
Reply to this comment
by mjb89 July 30, 2009 9:21 AM EDT
All of you who are now screaming about a tax on sodas didn't give a darn when the taxes were levied on cigarettes did you? Well, walk in my shoes for a while.
Reply to this comment
by justcurious777 July 30, 2009 9:40 AM EDT
Sorry about that...lots of people were screaming warnings back then but some of us just didn't want to believe it could/would come to this. I kind of leaned towards one side then back again...

It first crossed my mind when they made the seatbelt laws, but hey, it's a good thing, right? Saves lives and all that - so people lose a little of their freedom choice...obviously they were making the wrong choice by not wearing their seatbelts, so go ahead, let the government mandate it. And we did nothing...

Then again, with the smoking taxes. Ok, I was a little more uncomfortable with that one because that's just way too much interference from the government, right? But then again, tobacco-related diseases do raise insurance premiums for everyone - including non-smokers, so maybe the government should intervene. But no, that is going beyond the scope of the government's powers - interfering with a person's freedom of choice...getting kind of scary now since the government has no business interfering with freedom of choice. BUT second-hand smoke is dangerous to people besides the people making the choice to smoke. So, fine, let the government tax tobacco until smokers can't afford it. And we did nothing...

Yeah, I saw the pattern but made excuses for it...but NOW, even I can't ignore what's going on...so I apologize for not being more supportive when smokers were losing their rights. Who knows what will come after the soda "sin" tax? Who knows what'll be next? Where will it end?
by OregonJames July 30, 2009 8:42 AM EDT
Somebody has to pay for health care. This is another case of everyone wanting to dance, but nobody wants to pay the band.

I think we should tax soft drinks, bottled water, and most other junk foods, and I think the tax should be high, just as it is for tobacco products.

I also support an import tax on all goods entering our country, but that's another debate.
Reply to this comment
by proudmilvet July 30, 2009 6:32 AM EDT
If We Could Tax Rush Limbaugh by the Pound, The Recession Would Dissapear!
Reply to this comment
by proudmilvet July 30, 2009 6:27 AM EDT
I Think we should Tax Rieses Peanut Butter Cups. Fat People Eat A Lot Of Those!
Reply to this comment
by strmrnnr July 30, 2009 1:05 AM EDT
You will see more and more of this as the Health Care Reform comes in. In Canada, anything that is deamed to be a burden on the health care system is more heavily taxed. Alcohol and tabacco being the biggies. Most healthy foods from the market are untaxed though depending on the ingredients and their 'magic formula'.
Reply to this comment
See all 198 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Can the Postal Service be Saved?

    (298 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER