World Watch
June 24, 2009 5:00 AM

In Iran, Winds Of Change Are A Gentle Breeze

There are reports that Iran's clerical establishment is weighing the option of replacing supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei with a panel of religious officials over his contentious role in the election dispute.

Britain's International Business Times, citing Al Arabiya TV, says the country's powerful, 86-member Assembly of Experts — headed by former president Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani — is split in its support for Khamenei, and his surrogate, current president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The unconfirmed report suggests the Experts have met secretly in Iran's holy city of Qom to discuss a political compromise to the week-and-a-half old political unrest which followed the announcement of disputed presidential election results.

An option they are reportedly considering is a complete change in the structure of the 30-year-old Islamic Republic's government — replacing the supreme leader with a panel and forcing President Ahmadinejad out of power.

That would be a decidedly dramatic upheaval by the Assembly, and many observers see such a radical change in Iran's politics as unlikely — especially given the current regime's continued defiance in the face of street protests. A swift crackdown has led to a great reduction in the number of opposition protesters taking to the streets in recent days.

More likely to emerge from the clerics is some sort of compromise which would allow Khamenei and Ahmadinejad to remain in their current positions.

CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer, one of the last Western journalists to be forced out of Iran, told CBS Evening News anchor Katie Couric that Iran is ungovernable right now because it is split — "half love Ahmadinejad and half loathe him."

"It will be up to the ruling clerics to try and figure out how to get the two sides to cooperate," explained Palmer who has been to Iran to cover the country several times during the last five years.

She said the clerics "may try to cramp Ahmadinejad's style" to placate the opposition movement — which could include allowing greater social freedoms.

"But all these are delay tactics," added Palmer. "The fact is 70 percent of this country is young. Most of them have had enough. They want Iran to rejoin the world."

Asked of the likelihood that this most recent political upheaval would simply subside and Iran would return, in the long run, to the status quo, Palmer replied without hesitation: "Not a chance."

"Iran is going to be utterly transformed 10 to 15 years from now."

Tags:
iran ,
mousavi ,
khamenei ,
revolution ,
election ,
ahmadinejad
Topics:
World Watch
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by jacklfuller June 24, 2009 9:20 AM EDT
This time, I am going to be a little easier on Barry the Prez. He had no idea this whole uprising thing was about to happen. What he needs is a good intelligence system so he can keep up. Its not his fault that he got caught with his britches down.
Reply to this comment
by melchg07 June 24, 2009 11:22 AM EDT
Spoken like true idiot.

Biden was the only person in the debates to even bring up the Iran election. Obama giving major speeches in the Middle East just prior to Iran's election......did you think that it was just a coincidence?

Obama played the cards right....his adminstration knew that Iran was sick of their current nutjob of a president, however they likely wouldn't sway from him if America still was the hardliner like Bush made us out to be.

Obama reaching out to the middle east put the pressure on the regimes out there. America was no longer the face of satan that the regimes played off of. If McCain had been elected.....no major outreach to the middle east would have happened.....in fact McCain/Palin would have likely made major speeches on how Iran is evil and that they better they are our enemy.

Its idiots like you that need to go the way of the dinosaur and leave the rest in peace.
by prometheus21 June 24, 2009 7:50 AM EDT
"But all these are delay tactics," added Palmer. "The fact is 70 percent of this country is young. Most of them have had enough. They want Iran to rejoin the world."

This I believe includes advancements toward a domestic nuclear energy program to reduce it's reliance on foriegn coporate distilleries. It is almost impossible to fathom the absolute dumbfounding ignorance a "journalist" could have to not acknowlege the advancements already made in Iran with the influx of wealth as oil prices sky-rocketed in particular. A great deal of this has been used to improve the lives of the less-privileged in Iran.

Do you really think a society that is out of step with the rest of the world is going to have all this popular electronic consumerism to carry on some voter minority protest and cell-phone camera propaganda campaign with the english speaking world?

I don't think most people even understand what this minority is protesting. Greater economic freedom for the privileged is a big part of it, and a lot of that has to do with this influx of wealth as oil prices sky-rocketed. The resentment here by this FRACTION of the 70% of Iran's young population representing this opposition to the election results "oppressed youth" has a lot to do with the perceived "squandering" of this newly acquired wealth due to sky-rocketing oil prices -- which we in the U.S. are the victims of BTW -- on the nation's poor, old and primarily young alike. This is just plain on GREED by parasites in society waiting for the next boon to profit them and no-one else. PLAIN OLD GREEDY CAPITALISM FOLKS.

I had to laugh when I heard some reporter on CNN last night refer to the manufacturer built-in technology that allows government's like the U.S. to easily block, censor, control and monitor internet traffic and communications as a "double edged sword", because no one had anticipated this being used by the Iranian government.

How sick is that?
Reply to this comment
by michaelm07 June 24, 2009 7:45 AM EDT
. . . "half love Ahmadinejad and half loathe him."

Hmm, according to polls, sort of like Obama - half lova and, half loathe.
Reply to this comment
by despido June 24, 2009 6:22 AM EDT
"Iran is going to be utterly transformed 10 to 15 years from now."
-------------------------------------------------
9 to 14 years after attaining a nuclear weapon.
Reply to this comment

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR