Econwatch
June 16, 2009 8:36 PM

Obama's Planned Financial Overhaul: No Sure Thing

(AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)


In the first few weeks of the then-new Obama administration, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner announced a sweeping but vague overhaul of the U.S. financial system. The stock market showed what it thought of that idea by tumbling nearly 400 points.

Don't expect a repeat of that exercise when Geithner and President Obama announce another regulatory revamp on Wednesday: their aides have tried to avoid the possibility of surprising the market by assiduously leaking details. After a week of disclosures, bit by bit, the broad outlines of tomorrow's news may turn out to be the least-surprising White House announcement this summer.

In Wednesday's announcement, Geithner and Obama are expected to outline another reshaping of the financial system -- scaled back from earlier drafts -- that would put the Federal Reserve in charge of overseeing companies so large or significant that their collapse would lead to market turmoil. But a bigger consolidation into one uber-regulator is unlikely.

The administration believes the change is necessary because of the crop of regulatory agencies, with acronyms including SEC, FDIC, FINRA, OCC, NCUA, FFIEC, OTS, FHRA, and the FRB, that grown like weeds in the nation's capital. One possibility is the elimination of the Office of Thrift Supervision, which is tasked with the job of maintaining the soundness of savings banks and savings and loans, with poor results.

"Our framework for financial regulation is riddled with gaps, weaknesses and jurisdictional overlaps, and suffers from an outdated conception of financial risk. In recent years, the pace of innovation in the financial sector has outstripped the pace of regulatory modernization, leaving entire markets and market participants largely unregulated," Geithner and National Economic Council director Lawrence Summers wrote in an opinion article this week in the Washington Post.

The contours of the plan also appear to include more focus on asset-backed securities and more regulation of derivative contracts; another likely suggestion is the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency.

"We put together a consumer protection agency that will...ensure that one agency is responsible for protecting consumers as opposed to having a lot of divided attention between consumers, investors, the soundness of financial institutions," Mr. Obama said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. "I think the world has gotten more complicated... If suddenly you can, as a 20-year-old college student sign up for five different credit cards, if you find yourself able on a $30,000 a year income to buy a $400,000 house with no money down, then you are you are much more gullible to the inducements that are out there than a generation ago."

One hitch, though, is that even the president of the United States can't order this financial reshaping with the stroke of a pen. Congress created this dizzying array of agencies, and Congress may not choose to acquiesce.

Vesting more power with the Federal Reserve alarms some politicians in a position to block or delay the proposal, including Senate Banking Chairman Christopher Dodd, a Democrat, who prefers an entirely different approach. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila C. Bair and John C. Dugan, the comptroller of the currency, have also been clashing. Lobbyists are entrenching.

And although Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has his fans -- most notably the president himself -- Capitol Hill is actually moving toward increasing scrutiny of the organization.

In February, Rep. Ron Paul, the former Republican presidential candidate from Texas, introduced legislation that mandates a thorough audit of the Federal Reserve.

The audit bill now enjoys 229 co-sponsors -- or over half the entire U.S. House of Representatives. "The tremendous grass-roots and bipartisan support in Congress for HR 1207 is an indicator of how mainstream America is fed up with Fed secrecy," Paul said last week when his bill hit the halfway mark. "I look forward to this issue receiving greater public exposure."

Tags:
financial regulation ,
federal reserve ,
timothy geithner ,
ron paul
Topics:
Regulation
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by lami987 June 28, 2009 3:15 AM EDT
Nothing can be sure. But at least he tried to do the right things. For too long our businesses were allowed to run wild.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 June 25, 2009 5:21 PM EDT
Just go back to Glass-Steagall.

Reality is the biggest regulator of them all.

If you try to fight 'reality' with bank bailouts you will lose as a taxpayer.

We don't need some global-governing-body to regulate common-sense like mixing up casino houses like Goldman Sucks with regular charter banks.

or legitamizing gambling bets by insuring worthless derivatives and credit-dewfault swaps with taxpayer money.
Reply to this comment
by micheleisfree June 22, 2009 7:02 PM EDT
Here's the solution:
Tax the Churches!
Not taxing the churches is NOT Separation of Church and State!
Reply to this comment
by Macsure June 17, 2009 1:05 PM EDT
The Sheriff must be brought back into town. The Obama Administration is trying to do this. Whether they've chosen the best way (like building up the already questionable Federal Reserve) is a matter for discussion, debate and RESOLUTION. How effective, efficient and dedicated the new Sheriff will be is ultimately up to us.

That means: if we don't man-up and keep track of what Congress is doing with the Obama financial reform plan, we are asking for continued, even worse, economic troubles.

A do agree with those who question why American taxpayer / voters have gotten so little out of the economic stimulus. If you examine your own financial life, you will see that YOU are part of the basis for our economy.
It is wage earners / tax payers who are always the ones "depended upon" to produce the money needed to run all business and all government services. This requires of us both serious effort and self discipline, but it also requires of government and business the recognition that we cannot be mistreated and ignored (or misled). We must keep our own house in order - and then demand that our government and businesses play fair and honestly.

Wage earner / consumers make up 72% of economic activity: we are more than "equal partners" with government and business. It's time to stand together and make this the salient fact for Congress and millionaire executives to keep in mind.
Reply to this comment
by TheMasses0003 June 17, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
Yodeling can be fun ...............
Reply to this comment
by NY-Joe-10 June 17, 2009 10:51 AM EDT
Where are our stimulus checks and middle-class tax cuts ??

We seem to have millions to give to carribean islands to take our prisoners who could have just stayed put, if Obama didn't have to put on a show, pretending to shut-down Gitmo without a plan.

No, we have millions and millions for Gaza, Abortion and Terrorist Hosts, but nothing for the middle class......NOTHING !!!

Am I the only one who notices ?
Reply to this comment
by spillover June 17, 2009 11:00 AM EDT
NY-Joe-10,You are spot on
by speakinup22 June 19, 2009 5:19 PM EDT
BANG !!!!

You nailed that one Joe.
by woeisme1 June 17, 2009 10:39 AM EDT
ALL YOU RIGHT WING RADICALS CALLING FOR A REVOLUTION NEED TO BE CHAINED AND TORTURED AT GITMO!
Reply to this comment
by NY-Joe-10 June 17, 2009 10:54 AM EDT
ALL YOU LEFT-WING RADICAL LIBERALS NEED TO GO HUG A TREE, GRAZE ON SOME WHEAT GRASS AND SHUT UP ALREADY......THIS PRESIDENT IS AN AMATEUR
by spillover June 17, 2009 10:58 AM EDT
woeisme, you sir are one sad individual.
by speakinup22 June 19, 2009 5:25 PM EDT
Who wants a revolution ?

You mean the the WHOLE 3 individuals that were water boarded ?

You need some new slogans to be anything other than a troll.
by wdh3007 June 17, 2009 10:31 AM EDT
I am convinced that this president has no clue as to what he is doing he is either very smart or very stupid. More government regulation is not the answer but a complete takeover of the nation & people of this country better wake up and protest like those in Iran or we will be controlled by this man until he is either voted out, overthrown or worse.
Reply to this comment
by woeisme1 June 17, 2009 10:38 AM EDT
I AM CONVINCED YOU RIGHT WING RADICALS HAVE EVEN LESS OF A CLUE!
by speakinup22 June 19, 2009 5:18 PM EDT
Woeisme1, your being convinced of anything bad about the right is a forgone conclusion. As most close minded people can't see anything but hate.

Kind of reminds me of the Iranian government's point of view about Israel and the US.
by quickly101 June 17, 2009 9:23 AM EDT
Our government is broken and cannot be fixed. What is needed is a restart. A revolution if you will. A new constitution is needed because the entrenched ruling class will not allow the amendments to the existing one it so sorely needs. The new constitution needs to have such provisions as, a balanced budget, strict term limits, limiting the size of the national government would be a few starters.
Reply to this comment
by despido June 17, 2009 8:42 AM EDT
More mistakes in the making. Passing emotion-charged legislation to deal with a past crisis while creating the next bubble is exactly what got us here in the first place. The Tech bubble, the mortgage bubble, the housing bubble and the derivitives bubble were all the result of government 'encouragement' in various sectors of the economy. All done with good intentions, they were ticking time bombs. Each dip in our economy has led to knee-jerk legislation we later regretted.

New massive debt, a new punitive tax structure, regulation of unknown goal or purpose, blatant favortism, and government competition with private enterprize appeal to those with a vindictive mindset, but actually form the basis of the next, even bigger crisis while foolishly hoping to change the past.
Reply to this comment
by Jeremiah09 June 17, 2009 2:07 AM EDT
Different issues come up when Obama wins the election. How Obama got elected was a controversial issues to some American citizen. A lot of people want to know How Obama Got Elected. How Obama Got Elected is also the title of a documentary by John Ziegler, whose film purports that he was elected because the mainstream media was mean to Sarah Palin. It has been suggested that Obama was elected was via a process called voting ? which has not occurred to Mr. Ziegler, who isn?t famed for intellectual prowess ? and on a recent interview with Contessa Brewer on MSNBC, his microphone was cut due to his refusal to not act like an idiot. Many would give big cash advances to make How Obama Got Elected to go away and Ziegler to shut up. Today, thousand of Iranian and non-Iranians protest for the result of Iranian elections. Visit http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/06/11/john-zieglers-how-obama-elected-sale/ for more info.
Reply to this comment
by pensacola8-2009 June 16, 2009 10:52 PM EDT
President Obama has my full confidence in his decisions and choices. I do not expect perfection and know the risks are big.

Perhaps it is appropriate to remind citizens about the history of risk that President Reagan took in the 1980's. The USA was one trillion dollars in deficiet and President Reagan gambled and doubled our deficiet to two trillion dollars with a massive defense program buildup that ultimately led to winning the Cold War with the USSR in 1989.

There is no Berlin Wall that will come down for President Obama. What we win if President Obama succeeds can't be expressed with political trophies, but the head-spinning changes are possible.

Getting more Americans into Mortgagable, Insurable, and Taxable homes is really an expression about the definition of community by our citizens.

Getting more Americans employable, educatable and healthy is really an expression about the definition of personal success be each citizen.

Each citizen is needed to define and gain agreement about the goals of this nation. Good Partnerships with others and good relationships with opportunities is essential.

President Obama is still the source of hope and encouragement that we will survive the risks that we take and prosper more effectively if we don't hesitate or move forward with fear.
Reply to this comment
by spillover June 17, 2009 10:53 AM EDT
Yea,we are moving forward allright if you want socialism.
by micheleisfree June 16, 2009 9:52 PM EDT
Here's a solution for every failing state:
Tax the Churches!
They are profit-making businesses.
Not taxing churches is NOT separation of Church and State!
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments

About Econwatch

News and analysis on the state of the economy from CBS News.

E-Mail EconWatch

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

    (337 recent comments)