Political Hotsheet
March 30, 2009 4:14 PM

Bush Daughters Kept Secret Service Protection

(AP)

Four days before leaving office, President Bush signed a directive authorizing the Secret Service to provide a period of extended protection for his daughters Jenna and Barbara.

Last week, the Service mistakenly said that President Obama had signed an Executive Order on behalf of his predecessor’s daughters.

Under the law, the adult children of an American President lose their Secret Service protection when their father leaves office.

But following the lead of Bill Clinton, who authorized an extended period of coverage for daughter Chelsea, Mr. Bush made the same provision for his daughters. He signed a presidential directive on January 16, 2009. The Secret Service requested that the length of the additional protection not be disclosed.

A Secret Service spokesman admits getting it wrong last week when he told the Washington Post that Mr. Obama signed an Executive Order authorizing extended protection for the Bush daughters.

The issue came up when it was learned that a van used by the Secret Service detail assigned to Jenna, had been towed by Baltimore Police because it had accumulated six unpaid parking tickets.

CBS News has learned that the Secret Service also provided about a month’s additional protection to former Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.

By law, former President Bush receives government protection for ten years. Former Vice President Dick Cheney gets it for six months after leaving office.

Note: CBS News state department reporter Charles Wolfson reports that former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice also received some extended protection from the State Department's bureau of diplomatic security after she left office. It is not known how long the protection lasted or if it still in effect. However, it should be noted that this is not unprecedented as former Secretary of State Madeline Albright also received similar extended protection for approximately six months after she left office.


(CBS)
Mark Knoller is a CBS News White House correspondent. You can read more of his posts in Hotsheet here.
Tags:
george bush ,
jenna bush ,
barbara bush ,
secret service
Topics:
George W. Bush
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by commonsens July 22, 2009 1:44 PM EDT
Surely the commenter is joking about psycho liberals with guns - no one could be that delusional. It seems to me that the Bush family is wealthy enough to pay for extra protection for their daughters if they wish, without the entire country paying for it.
Reply to this comment
by wonkguy July 22, 2009 12:51 AM EDT
"The issue came up when it was learned that a van used by the Secret Service detail assigned to Jenna, had been towed by Baltimore Police because it had accumulated six unpaid parking tickets."

And Bush wanted to extend this kind of security? Did they learn that trick in Spy School?
Reply to this comment
by Idiosync July 21, 2009 2:40 PM EDT
Ha! they all waste our money. Politicians = Criminals, all politicians.
Reply to this comment
by Idiosync July 21, 2009 2:37 PM EDT
Cheney should be in jail anyway. He'll get all the protection he needs in there. I think his daughter is in jeopardy though. If he needs a heart transplant, she's toast. He'd remove it himself if he could and he wouldn't have to worry about rejecting it. Anyone who would do the things he's done to the American people can only view his family as spare parts.
Reply to this comment
by pass2you July 20, 2009 1:18 PM EDT
If anything happened to these brats, it would most likely be a set up by the bush family just like everything else they were involved with.
Reply to this comment
by pass2you July 20, 2009 1:14 PM EDT
What an absolute waste of taxpayers money by extending protection for these two spoiled little brats. No one cared about them when their criminal father was in office and no one with any brain cares about them now. This entire family has cost this nation so much more than we will ever know. They are nothing but parasites.
Reply to this comment
by sebring64 July 20, 2009 1:03 PM EDT
The article is facutally incorrect. Mr. Knoller indicates that a former President receives Secret Service protection for 10 years. A former President receives it for life as does a former first lady, unless she becomes widowed and remarries.
Reply to this comment
by Tonker22 July 20, 2009 1:20 PM EDT
Wrong, The President no long get's lifetime S.S. protection starting with Bush.
by dnsallday July 20, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
If the Secret Service is going to have a spokesman for the media, they should have one that doesn't lie. If he didn't lie and simply didn't know what he was talking about, I don't think is very good either.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 March 31, 2009 10:29 PM EDT
Kind of ironic and hypocritical in a way, liberals insists they're against violence but have no problem doing violence.
Posted by ReallyMeanIt at 9:46 AM : Mar 31, 2009
********************************
Hmmm...yes, all of those "liberals" doing violence. Like Timothy McVey, those liberals shooting doctors that perform abortions, the nut that set the bomb off at the worlds fair in Atlanta.
I have never disliked an American president as much as I disliked Bush, but when I read the article, I thought that extended protection for his girls was probably a good idea. If it were my daughters, I would do the same thing. And by the way, I have never done a darn thing violent in my life.
Reply to this comment
by ReallyMeanIt March 31, 2009 12:46 PM EDT
Judging from the comments posted , SS protection is warranted for the Bushes daughers. There are a lot of psychopathic liberals out there who wishes harm upon harm them.
Kind of ironic and hypocritical in a way, liberals insists they're against violence but have no problem doing violence.
Reply to this comment
by lonecrone July 20, 2009 10:02 AM EDT
Nonsense. The crazies with the guns are toothless, tattooed, trailer trash who voted for Bush, McCain and Palin. Liberals make noise but they don't go gunning for people. The last liberal violence was during the Vietnam war. Every recent crazy we've had shooting things up have been strange, fringe conservatives and religious nutjobs. Who bombed Oklahoma City? Who shot up the Holocaust Museum? Who was caught driving around planning to shoot Obama? Who posted a sign on his store for a betting pool to see who would shoot Obama.

Sure, protect those girls, but they don't need protection from liberals, just paparazzi, kidnappers and gun toting wackos
by homebeforedark March 31, 2009 12:29 PM EDT
While I do not wish the Bush daughters ill, I do think any president and cabinet members who think war is the solution to any problem should be required to send their own family members first. And be sure to give them the lack of protection (bad hummers, sub standard uniforms, helmets and those really nifty showers Halliburton rigged up to electrocute the troops as way to reward our no-bid friends in greed.
Reply to this comment
by cheetah-man7 March 31, 2009 9:26 AM EDT
Sad world we live in!
Reply to this comment
by spaceatoms March 31, 2009 12:08 AM EDT
The Bush daughters are hot! Bush is looking better and better as a President, we had some very good years when he was in office.
Reply to this comment
by lonecrone July 20, 2009 9:55 AM EDT
Really? You think they were good years? Multiple wars, running up the national debt and squandering the surplus he inherited, letting wall street and banks run roughshod with no regulation? That was good? Signing off on a bailout with no restrictions was good?

What about how the USA lost the respect of every country in the world? You think it was good that people threw shoes at Bush and demonstrated against him at every turn?

Where have you been living?
by texasbeta March 30, 2009 11:36 PM EDT
*****
Reply to this comment
by realityzone March 30, 2009 11:26 PM EDT
Who cares
Reply to this comment
by karela33 March 30, 2009 10:57 PM EDT
I'm very glad that Obama is President and I'm also very glad that Jenna and Barbara are protected. They need it and we don't make war on children. This country doesn't want to make another milestone---------harm coming to ex presidents or their families.
Reply to this comment
by lisachamp July 22, 2009 6:07 PM EDT
First of all the Bush daughters are not children. However, it doesn't bother me if we (taxpayers) pay for maybe an extra year, but no more.
I never read that President Obama extended their protection. I thought I read that he had extended Cheney's.
by DefendLiberty March 30, 2009 7:44 PM EDT
They could take Bushies's S.S. away and I could care less. However, no one should have any trouble with some extra protection for the daughters. There are some real wackos out there, and I'm not just talking about the extremist right sycophants.
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER