"Betrayed" AIG Exec Offers Public Resignation

(AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
In the letter, which ran as an op-ed piece in Tuesday's New York Times, executive vice president Jake DeSantis said he was leaving the company because "we in the financial products unit have been betrayed by A.I.G. and are being unfairly persecuted by elected officials."
Liddy appeared before Congress last week to answer for the $165 million in bonus money going to executives of the Financial Products division – the part of the company widely blamed for AIG's near collapse. Those payments, and their recipients, have been blasted by lawmakers and, notably, the attorneys general of New York and Connecticut, who have sought the release of their names.
DeSantis insists he was not involved in the credit default swaps that are at the root of AIG's problems, noting that most of those responsible "have left the company and have conspicuously escaped the public outrage."
But being painted with the same brush as those alleged culprits by Congress has left DeSantis feeling "let down."
"I take this action after 11 years of dedicated, honorable service to A.I.G. I can no longer effectively perform my duties in this dysfunctional environment, nor am I being paid to do so. Like you, I was asked to work for an annual salary of $1, and I agreed out of a sense of duty to the company and to the public officials who have come to its aid. Having now been let down by both, I can no longer justify spending 10, 12, 14 hours a day away from my family for the benefit of those who have let me down."
DeSantis criticized Liddy for not defending workers in the "face of untrue and unfair accusations" from lawmakers and "baseless and reckless comments" from the attorneys general of New York and Connecticut, Andrew Cuomo and Richard Blumenthal, respectively.
He said the decision to ask for the bonus payments back was a "breach of trust" and only came because Liddy faced political pressure. DeSantis said the promise of the bonuses was the only reason for some workers to stay on at AIG and try to manage its crisis.
"We have worked 12 long months under these contracts and now deserve to be paid as promised. None of us should be cheated of our payments any more than a plumber should be cheated after he has fixed the pipes but a careless electrician causes a fire that burns down the house," he wrote.
DeSantis said he received a $742,006.40 bonus in March and would not return it. Rather, he plans to donate the after-tax sum to various charities, saying he did not "want to see them disappear back into the obscurity of A.I.G.’s or the federal government’s budget."
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 8
- next
See all 157 CommentsSteve - Hawaii, Washington, now Texas
If the bonus was a part of a contract to stay with AIG and he got the bonus, what about the contract to stay with AIG or forfeit the bonus? How is he now leaving with the bonus? If the bonus was to get him to stay until he recieved the bonus, but AIG had no money before being bailed out, to pay the bonus, how does a bail out intended to deliver on AIG's liabilites, (creditors and people who paid AIG money for goods and services AIG could not deliver on) not its optional and discretionary salary or operating expenses, now go to pay bonuses any bankruptcy judge would nix in a minute?
Slight of hand anyone?
Is this guy really expecting people to believe that he does not need such a bonus and while now donate it all to various charities? If he doesn't need it, why not give it back to the people that made it possible?
The con artists will ply their trade as long as they can get away with it and we continue to let them get away with it.
"A bunch of people (Mr. & Mrs. Unqualified) took out mortgages they could not afford - mostly on variable rate mortgages."
----------------------------------------
If Mr. and Mrs. Unqualified applied for a loan, who lent to unqualified people and would consider such "safe and sound lending practices"?
People who made commissions on sales?
No people to qualify for loans, no loans made, no loans made, no commissions on loans or no loans to trade, no loans to trade, no commissions on trades.
Motivation to lend to Mr. and Mrs. Unqualified? You guessed it!
No one was under any obligation to make bad loans and do things that were not safe and sound practices.
Are Americans going to continue to buy into the continued con of the greedy? The greedy don't want their gravy train to stop. While they can't tell you how they take advantage of the gravy train, because that would make you want to throw them in jail even more than you do now, They will try to obfuscate and throw the blame back onto those they are ripping off.
Unqualified people who got loans merely applied for them, the lender had the control with the words, yes or no.
Unqualified people are not blameless as no doubt some fudged and stretched their credibility and were lent money based on what looked to be safe and sound reliable and qualified buyers. Many were greedy too, hoping to get something they and the lenders knew they couldn't afford.
Unfortunately it's not just about lending or not lending, but keeping a finger on the pulse of the market. Real estate is boom and bust, boom and bust and generally even people who do all the right things are left holding the proverbial bag because they pressed their luck and in many as a result of their greed. This time it looks like greed infected everyone and caution and safe and sound procedures were tossed to the wind for the almighty buck.
Some people now know, if they didn't before, why greed and vanity have generally been considered sins, not virtues.
I wager if it were not for the Federal stimulus packets we would be in a fair degree more trouble right now.
Like I said, he probably has bills to pay too. And his dignity to worry about. I would lose patience if I were in his situation too. This man is within the bounds of sanity for quitting.
Furthermore, whether some people like to admit it or not, AIG is important to our economic survival. If the people who keep it running start jumping ship left and right, do you think that is going to do us good? If you give them a relatively paltry bonus and they stay on the job, how does that translate into a bad thing?
If you think a few million dollars in corporate bonuses is a waste of tax payer money, then you are not looking in the right places. The Federal government is the most efficient expert at wasting tax payer money and barely anyone bothers to complain year after year.
Let's see if you can follow this.
A bunch of people (Mr. & Mrs. Unqualified) took out mortgages they could not afford - mostly on variable rate mortgages. The Rate went up - and the payment went up - now they can not pay.
A bunch of these homes were taken over by the bank that lent them the money.
Now the banks have all these homes with no income coming in from them. So the banks started losing money.
AIG was into mortgage trading and took some very risky moves. 11 to 1 odds trading. As the mortgages failed so did the trades.
Also when the banks lose money, they go to their insurance company AIG.
So Mr. & Mrs. Unqualified that took out loans for mortgages they couldn't pay, caused the the banks to fail and AIG went down too.
Now in the idiots defence we have ACORN and congress who helped pushed people into buying homes they couldn't afford and forcing banks to lend Mr. & Mrs. Unqualified money so they are responsible too.
AIG gave money to Goldman Sacs, CIti Banks, State of California who also got bailout money from the Federal Gov't. There's some double dippin going on here too.
By the way, there was a person earlier who said they made $20,000/year and didn't want their tax dollars going to AIG, well it won't coz you don't make enough money to be paying any income taxes, only those making over $70,000/year should have a say in these, the rest of you aren't contributing to the bailout.
If you don't know who DIck Morris is, maybe you should look him up.
Posted by citizen4honor at 12:10 PM : Mar 25, 2009
If you don't know what socialism is, maybe you should look it up.
You sell a product, people have paid you for that product, but you are having trouble delivering that product to them. What do you do? Ignore the people that have paid you money and pay yourself your regular salary and maintain your same operating expenses?
The money you pay yourself with and that goes toward expenses comes from where, you? No, it comes from the customer who paid you money in exchange for a product you must deliver on or be held liable for the amount they paid you. How do you pay that liability or deliver what your customers paid for? By paying a bonus to yourself? By adding to your operating expense by paying bonuses to others?
Why does anyone believe AIG and a number of other huge corporations are in bad shape? Their executives are worried more about their pay and bonuses than sustaining the business that pays those salaries and bonuses. To sustain that business you need to make good on delivering what people paid you for before you pay yourself, since the money they paid you is not yours until you have delivered on your part of the bargain.
US taxpayers reserve? you own it. Now if you invest into your own country guess what. Who will control the government? HMMMMMMM go figure and educate yourself. Your president is reaching out to you people so WAKE UP!!!!!!
Posted by citizen4honor at 12:10 PM :
Can you please explain what failed mortgages have to do with American Insurance Group?
Posted by dragonwagon5
A bunch of former AIG employees now have one.
1. Clearly Congress and the administration have bungled things bandly. (Goes back to Bush admin Tarp as well.)
2. The companies are in large part to blame for where they are today. But, Congress, the Exexutive and probably legislative all have their parts to blame.
3. Let's not forget our individual greed which certainly has played a part in what goes on.
4. The screaming, especially from the Congress, is highly hypocritical. To every Senator or Congressman who voted for these bills w/o reading them, shut up! You KNOW you did not know what was in there, You did not care what was in there and you voted for it! Do not cry now.
5. Let's not forget the part of the media. Are these bonuses evil? Who knows? There has been zero reporting on who got them (positionally), how much they were individually, how deserved they were and what was the total package. An executive level salary of 750k per year is not a lot of money. If you only get paid by bonus, it is really not a bonus. 185 million in bonuses is a huge number, but, is it a lot or excess of money for the compensation of the work that was done? Again, who knows? CBS, FOX, ABC, and the great lefty NBC have all been very silent on exactly what was covered. They have not even asked the questions. They created the hysteria, but, do we know if the hysteria is warranted? Would we be mad if they said we have 500 000 employees and spent 200 million paying them (40k a year?) Again, bias in the news and manipulation of the news has much less to do with what is reported than with what is not reported.
Personally, I think most of these companies should be left along to sink or swim. We are going through a big reset and sometimes that is what is necessary.
Posted by McHineguy
I'm not sure where you've been over the last four years, but talk of America losing its reserve currency status has been bandied about since the United States reached the twin milestone of record debt and record trade deficits resulting in a diminishing dollar.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 8
- next
See all 157 Comments