World Watch
January 8, 2009 10:52 PM

Security Council Passes Cease-Fire Resolution

After a week of negotiations, the U.N. Security Council voted 14-0, with a U.S. abstention, for a cease-fire in the embattled Gaza Strip.

The resolution passed by Council members calls for an immediate, durable and fully respected cease-fire leading to the full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza. The U.S. did not vote against, which would have had the effect of a veto.

(AP Photo/John Marshall Mantel)
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, seen at left abstaining from the vote, said the resolution was a step toward U.S. goals and a step toward a sustainable peace in Gaza. "We require a principled resolution of the situation in Gaza," Rice said.

The abstention was the surprise of the evening, as the U.S. had negotiated tirelessly with Great Britain and France for a resolution that would support Israel's security interests and bring a negotiated cease-fire to Gaza. But it was apparent from Rice's comments that the U.S. did not want to have to commit to an immediate cease-fire, unless Hamas agreed to it as well.

The U.N. passing a resolution calling for a cease-fire does not guarantee that either Hamas or Israel will respect it, but the vote does mean Arab League countries and the U.K. and France — which negotiated the deal — have agreed on the design for a truce.

For the Bush administration, the U.N. vote was a legacy issue. Rice brokered the Middle East deal four years ago and the administration had an interest in leaving President-elect Barack Obama with a possible resolution to the crisis in Gaza.

Rice said the U.S. abstained – knowing the resolution would pass – because Washington wanted to see the results of on-going Egyptian mediation efforts, presumably meaning that Washington wants to wait and see if Hamas can be brought onboard a cease-fire agreement. Earlier in the day, Hamas officials rejected the current Cairo proposal.

In addition to the cease-fire, the Security Council resolution calls for the unimpeded provision and distribution throughout Gaza of humanitarian assistance, the re-opening of border crossings, and a crackdown on arms smuggling to Hamas.

On the political front, the resolution applauds the Egyptian initiative to bring Israel, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority to negotiations, encourages the reconciliation of Palestinian factions, and supports a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – an addition important to the Arab League.

The resolution passed, however, on the same day that the U.N. halted all deliveries of aid to Gaza after gunfire from an Israeli tank killed a relief worker.
Tags:
gaza ,
israel ,
hamas ,
UN ,
united nations ,
security council ,
falk ,
ceasefire ,
rice
Topics:
World Watch
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by tim1215-2009 January 9, 2009 7:59 PM EST
Israel is not safer and the people who will pay for this is as, as far as i can tell we a not the "chosen 1s" so y I we picking sides. Israel and Hamas are the same (but not in power), they all kill people in the name of there GOD this includes children (over 250) and that I can not support I don''t care what god sent u wrong is wrong stop the killing
Reply to this comment
by xlyd January 9, 2009 10:27 AM EST
The Truth will stand on its own merit. If you want to know the Truth, Google this:

"A Jewish Defector Warns America:

Benjamin Freedman Speaks"
Reply to this comment
by salah-el-din January 9, 2009 3:49 AM EST
For how long will the "tail wag the dog"? With enablers like Nancy Pelosi in Congress, the Israeli Fascists will continue to massacre Palestinian civilians without any consequences. Who could imagine that the House of Representatives would rationalize the reckless killing of so many Palestinian women and children? This is disgusting and shameless!
Reply to this comment

About World Watch

Extra reporting, analysis and more from CBS foreign desks across the globe.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR