Horserace
October 30, 2008 3:00 PM

Poll: Voters Believe McCain Running More Negative Advertising

As part of a poll to be released in full later today, CBS News and the New York Times asked voters who have seen television ads for both Barack Obama and John McCain about the tone of those ads.

Their responses suggest there is a gulf in voter perception of the candidates' efforts, with Obama widely seen as running the more positive advertising campaign.

Half of those surveyed say Obama's ads are primarily focused on what the candidate stands for, while thirty percent say they have been mostly concerned with attacking his Republican rival. Fifteen percent say both.

The perception is far more negative for McCain: Just 21 percent say the Arizona senator's ads are primarily focused on what he stands for, while the majority – 64 percent – say the ads have been largely concerned with attacking Obama. Twelve percent cite both.

We'll be making further results from the poll available at 6:30 this evening, so check back with CBSNews.com and watch the Evening News for a full report.
Tags:
poll ,
barack obama ,
john mccain ,
ads
Topics:
Polls
Add a Comment See all 44 Comments
by pcgamer1969 November 1, 2008 11:15 AM EDT
I seriously considered voting for McCain...until he picked Palin, allowed her to throw cowardly smears at BO, failed to give any sound plans for solving this economic mess we''re in, went ga-ga over an unlicensed plumber who complains that he''d have to pay more taxes for making over 250 grand per year (even though he still hasn''t paid his own taxes yet...), launched the whole Jeremiah Wright controversy all over again here in NC (a non issue, just like Rezko, Ayers, and ACORN), labeled BO as dangerous and "not like us" (obvious implication being he is like someone other than an American), allowed his supporters to shout "Kill Him!" at his rallies with nothing calm the bitter words...

All while BO has kept away from Palin and the AIP, Troopergate, the Keating scandal, McCain''s marital infidelity...

So I was convinced that BO cares for the entire country, not just the rich like his wife...(boy...wish I could forget how many houses and cars I have...)
Reply to this comment
by newslink October 31, 2008 7:27 PM EDT
Negative Ads has been his Down Fall in this race. And the most silly Campaign that I have ever witness.Lying Palin, Crooked Joe,and Angry John has been a Comedy Team. From Day one, and we have never took him serious.
Reply to this comment
by charlesjr9 October 31, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
A hous divided among itself can not stand. America is going to get just what America deservrs. Is it America the Beautiful or Ugly-America all over again?
Reply to this comment
by azrael8 October 31, 2008 3:15 PM EDT
Perhaps McCain wouldn''t run as many ads if:

1. The press actually did thier job and vetted Obama istead of giving him a pass, or out and out supporting him.

2. Obama actually participated in the 10-12 town halls (since he is such a good campaigner it shouldn''t have been a problem), unless the veiwers would question his not actually saying how he will perform all of his miracles.

3. If Obama wasn''t a liar about using public financing. (wonder just how many minutes into his Presidency it will be, before he breaks all your hearts, when he admits he can''t do everything he said, because the economy can''t support it.)
Reply to this comment
by seah5 October 31, 2008 2:15 PM EDT
Those Obama followers home in good on all polls, Clickable links insite the obama site.

They are so Obedient and do them daily.
Reply to this comment
by julez41 October 31, 2008 12:34 PM EDT
It''s no surprise to me that McCain is viewed as running a more negative campaign, because he is. He hasn''t run a single policy ad in my area (Upstate NY) it''s all been negative smear tactics against Obama. Whereas Obama''s campaign ads have been more on his plans and policies for the future. Obama wants to unite the country where McCain would further divide the country. In my opinion there''s no debate on who is the better man for the job of President, the right man by far and away is Barak Obama.
Reply to this comment
by brucie2006 October 31, 2008 12:21 PM EDT
McShame will loose Arizona, that will be embarrassing -
Reply to this comment
by Confidential416 October 31, 2008 11:49 AM EDT
I live near PSU also. I''ve never been a Palin fan so I just see this as one more McSame/Failin error in a campaign fraught with mistakes. So much for the experience factor - the experienced McSame can not even run a decent campaign let alone the country
Reply to this comment
by Confidential416 October 31, 2008 11:45 AM EDT
John6Pack - I disagree - We are tired of negative campaigns. I completely shut McSame off as soon as I see him
Reply to this comment
by pjc27 October 31, 2008 11:14 AM EDT
I live close to PSU and you can be sure they will be offended, that''d be like Palin refusing to shake a flyers hand. Granted, they booes her anyway, but has she treated a flyer that way they''d have stoned her right then and there. There are some things you just don''t mess with in PA. So, for the very first time this election, my hat goes off to McFail. Great job! Keep on snubbin in PA!
Obama!
Reply to this comment
by achangenow October 31, 2008 4:29 AM EDT
McCain runs negative adds attacking Obama''s character because he doesn''t have an economic plan. Unfortunately, that''s all McCain has to offer. There''s a very good chance that McCain will continue many of Bush''s policies as he''s voted with Bush over 90% of the time. If you don''t think we need a change in the path the country is taking, then you need to get your head examined. Remember, McCain''s for the wealthy because he and Cindy are! "Trickle Down" economics don''t work! Also, he didn''t even mention the middle class during the first debate, the group makes up 2/3 of the economy!!
During the last 8 years, the middle class has gotten the shaft, including the Wall St. bailout. Can you say Welfare for the Rich? Sure you can!
Reply to this comment
by achangenow October 31, 2008 4:22 AM EDT
McCain runs negative adds attacking Obama''s character because he doesn''t have an economic plan. Unfortunately, that''s all McCain has to offer. There''s a very good chance that McCain will continue many of Bush''s policies as he''s voted with Bush over 90% of the time. If you don''t think we need a change in the path the country is taking, then you need to get your head examined. Remember, McCain''s for the wealthy because he and Cindy are! "Trickle Down" economics don''t work! Also, he didn''t even mention the middle class during the first debate, the group makes up 2/3 of the economy!!
During the last 8 years, the middle class has gotten the shaft, including the Wall St. bailout. Can you say Welfare for the Rich? Sure you can!
Reply to this comment
by kight67i October 31, 2008 1:55 AM EDT
OH YES....AYERS...WRIGHT...REZKO...KHALIDI....BOMBER..HATER...FELON...PLO.ALSO ACORN..UNDER INVESTIGATIONIN 14 STATES FOR VOTER FRAUD (INCLUDING MINE) FREDDIE MAC AND FANNIE MAE... PELOSI.. FRANK...DODD..."THEY JUST LIVE IN THE NEIGHBOR HOOD AND OUR CHILDREN PLAY TOGETHER.... I WANT TO RE-DISTRIBUTE THE WEALTH....YOU ALL MAKE TOO MUCH MONEY... AND I WILL TELL YOU HOW IT WILL BE SPENT. LET ME GET WITH MY NEIGHBORS... AND GET BACK TO YOU.
Reply to this comment
by greenfun October 31, 2008 1:19 AM EDT
I''m not one of them because although the media tries to paint it that way, and independent study has BO with more negative ads. He also runs a less honest dirty games campaign. Busing in voters from Ill to Iowa caucuses. 800 grand to ACORN.
Reply to this comment
by insight2008 October 31, 2008 12:03 AM EDT
Allow me to cut OB a little slack re my last entry #2. Getting advice is okay with me..the way it should be..as long as the FINAL decision was his. Hopefully, he was not told what to say. Suggestions are okay. Again, the final decision has to be his. Not sure I have a warm and fuzzy about that, but I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
I stick with my Joe Gaf statement.
Reply to this comment
by insight2008 October 30, 2008 10:14 PM EDT
Hope this is not too neg. Came from Dems own lips. Do not blame anyone else.
1. Joe Gaf Biden in MO today. Those Exxon profits should go to the middle class. Joe, you stepped in again. Karl loves you more than anyone. Socialism? I think so. Or, did you just mean some of the profits?
2. Bill Clinton. Obama got a lot of help on his response to the economic "crisis." Tell me what to say and I will sell it. Ummm..if you should happen to lose, how about used cars?? You will be rich in about a week.
#2 fits a NY Times (OB''s paper)article about 3 wks ago which opined that OB could not make a critical decision (you know, like if we are attacked) but would have to rely on someone else. Pls keep Colin close.
Not me folks. You can check it all out. It is public stuff.
Reply to this comment
by irmcvet97 October 30, 2008 9:14 PM EDT
For those of you who are still considering voting Obama the racist as our president, I urge you to look at this, just one more big lie Obama made about his background with racists:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y
SM63ES8t4U

Posted by citizen08 at 06:07 PM : Oct 30, 2008

God but you people are disgusting! There are 10 Families on OUR block losing their homes, we have a nation in the worst mess since the Great Depression and YOU freaks want to just throw Mud! GROW UP PLEASE! TRY BEING AMERICAN FOR A CHANGE!
Reply to this comment
by citizen08 October 30, 2008 9:07 PM EDT
For those of you who are still considering voting Obama the racist as our president, I urge you to look at this, just one more big lie Obama made about his background with racists:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySM63ES8t4U
Reply to this comment
by sickofpalin October 30, 2008 8:48 PM EDT
cindy and john are rich socialites

neither is really close to us, who work for a living

he voted against the minimun wage 18 times-so i am going to vote for this guy??
Reply to this comment
by sickofpalin October 30, 2008 8:42 PM EDT
palin is such an idiot

she can''t tell us what she reads

she is out there telling us about the evil of obama; she does not understand the role of VP and she thinks she can have credibility on other issues?

she soaked Alaska for her childrens travel and she is going to "shake up Washington"??

the women has b-a-l-l-s, i''l give her that
Reply to this comment
See all 44 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn