McCain: Obama Shows "Reckless Judgment" on Foreign Policy

(CBS)
From CBS News’ John Bentley:
Just as the “appeasement” controversy was dying down, John McCain and Barack Obama are once again sniping at each other over foreign policy. McCain said today that Obama is showing his “inexperience” and “reckless judgment” with remarks he made this morning about negotiating with Iran.
“Strong countries and strong presidents talk to their adversaries,” Obama said today, a sentiment he has recently been adding to his stump speeches. “That's what Kennedy did with Khrushchev. That's what Reagan did with Gorbachev. That's what Nixon did with Mao. I mean, think about it. Iran, Cuba, Venezuela – these countries are tiny compared to the Soviet Union. They don't pose a serious threat to us the way the Soviet Union posed a threat to us.”
McCain took exception to Obama’s characterization of Iran. “Iran provides some of the deadliest explosive devices used in Iraq to kill our soldiers. They are the chief sponsor of Shia extremists in Iraq, and terrorist organizations in the Middle East,” McCain said. “They might not be a superpower, but the threat the government of Iran poses is anything but ‘tiny.’”
Obama countered that Iran spends only “one-one hundredth” of what the U.S. spends on the military, and that they do not represent a serious threat to American security. “We should use that position of strength that we have to be bold enough to go ahead and listen,” Obama said. “We might not compromise on any issues, but at least we should find out other areas of potential common interest, and we can reduce some of the tensions that has caused us so many problems around the world."
A meeting with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would give the regime credit they do not deserve, according to McCain, and would not serve American interests. “It is likely such a meeting would not only fail to persuade him to abandon Iran’s nuclear ambitions, its support of terrorists and commitment to Israel’s extinction, it could very well convince him that those policies are succeeding in strengthening his hold on power, and embolden him to continue his very dangerous behavior,” McCain said. “The next president ought to understand such basic realities of international relations.”
Don''t worry McCain, if Obama is the nominee-Clinton supporters will have your back.
Our Great-grand Nation, the United States of America
is facing and will face very critical and substantial
"Challenges" in coming, months, years, and decades to
come.
It is very essential that we pick out our next
President keeping in mind the following criteria.
1. A candidate who has a clear and candid " Vision
and Mission" for our Nation.
2. A candidate with " Strong Character and Stable
Integrity" in-spite of adversity during primary
election process.
3. A candidate with sound and sustained
"Presidential Temperament" and
" Judgment".
4. A candidate with little "Washington exposure"
and "real connectedness with people and future
generation".
5. A candidate who "Inspires us up" rather than
"Tears us Down".
6. A candidate not based on sexism,
racism,regionalism,and ageism.
In my professional, political and personal opinion,
the only candidate who meets the all above
characteristics and has shown constant and consistent
coolness, calmness, and connectedness { PRESIDENTIAL
TEMPERAMENT } is Senator Barrack Obama.
Our Greatgrand nation needs present and future
stability, security, safety,sustained progress and
restoration of our due status in this perilous Global
World at the all levels.
Yours sincerely,
COL.[retd] A.M.Khajawall M.D.
Forensic Psychiatrist.
Disables American Veteran.
Las Vegas Nevada.
Cell: 951-505-6975
Except that Obama never said the threat from Iran was "tiny".
McCain thinks talking to Iran would "send the wrong message" and strengthen the power of the mullahs.
Well, let me ask you then, how has NOT talking to Iran been working out?
Iran is stronger now than it''s ever been - thanks to the clownish leadership of McCain and Bush. We got rid of Iran''s two big enemies, the Taliban and Saddam, and then installed a virtual Iranian client government in Iraq. Both major parties that make up the Iraqi Government were created in and funded by Iran and spent their exile years in Tehran. Iran is on top of the world (or at least the Persian Gulf), thanks to us.
At this point, I''m not sure how talking to Iran can possibly make things worse. And, morons, "talking" is not the same thing as "appeasement". Appeasement is "giving in to the demands of an aggressor"...to appease someone you essentially surrender. We "talked" to the Russians but we WON the Cold War.
McCain is right though when he says that the Iranian people, who are the most pro-American people in the middle east (other than the Israelis), dislike/hate their leaders and . I''m just not sure how bombing Iran will make their population MORE pro-American.
ONLY THE FIRST TIME????
MAYBE????????!
In other words, *HILLARY IS WINNING* !!!!!