Clinton Says Ignore the Media, "They Have Jobs and Healthcare"

(CBS)
From CBS News’ Ryan Corsaro:
LORETTO, KY. -- Hillary Clinton visited a bourbon distillery here today, where she asked Marion County voters for support and told them to ignore members of the media “who have jobs” that say she cannot win against Senator Barack Obama. She also spoke briefly on the hospitalization of her colleague, Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who was hospitalized this morning in Boston after suffering from two seizures.
“Speaking of health care,” Clinton told a crowd of around a thousand, “we had word this morning that my good friend and a great champion of working people, Sen. Ted Kennedy was rushed to the hospital with symptoms of a stroke, and our thoughts and prayers are with him and his family, because he has been a champion for health care.”
“Nobody has fought harder to make sure everybody got good health care. And I know that we all join together in wishing him well. But what Sen. Kennedy believes and what I believe and what many others believe is that every American should be entitled to the same health care as your member of Congress is entitled to. "
Clinton made the remarks after she visited the Maker’s Mark bourbon distillery today, where she hand-dipped a bottle in the brand’s trademark red wax.
She spoke for over a half hour, adamantly telling the crowd that she had the ability to beat the Republican presidential nominee, John McCain, in November.
She also maintained that she still holds a lead in the popular vote, telling voters not to be dissuaded by pundits who predict she is unlikely to surpass Obama’s momentum and delegate count at this point in the race. “Right now, if you add up the states that I have won, it totals 300 electoral votes,” said Clinton.
“You have to have 270 electoral votes to win. Now there are some states I’ve won that maybe won’t go for Democrats like Texas and Oklahoma, but I still have a comfortable margin. My opponent has won states totaling 217 electoral votes and lots of states like Alaska and Idaho and Utah that haven’t voted Democrat in a long time. So if you look at the states we have to win, if you look at the big states and look at the swing states, I am the stronger candidate.”
She also attacked members of the media directly. “All those people on TV who are telling you and everybody else that this race is over and I should just be graceful and say ‘Oh, it’s over’ even though I’ve won more votes – those are all people who have a job,” she said. “Those are all people who have healthcare. Those are all people who can afford to send their kids to college. Those are all people who can pay whatever is charged at the gas pump. They’re not the people I’m running to be a champion for –
I’m running to be a champion for all of you and your children and your grandchildren.”
Clinton continues to campaign in Kentucky through Tuesday’s primary.
More invested in manipulating the news instead of reporting it.
With pundits and politicos handicapping the campaign like the Super Bowl, it%u2019s easy to lose sight of what%u2019s at stake. An economy in peril. A country at war. A future uncertain. The media loves process. Talking heads love chatter. But Florida has a chance to turn down the noise. And show the world that leadership is what really matters.%u201D
"Take it to the Convention"
In 1932 Roosevelt took it to the convention. He won 3 terms. T Kennedy and J Carter took it to the convention, the Democrats chose a more moderate and we won that year too.
Your devotion to the people of the United States is already written in History. Your breadth of knowledge is apparent in all your winning debates. You give us courage and security in this world. Your leadership will propel the United States up where we belong. Your economic goal of "no deficit" is our goal too. You have over 17 million votes. Statistics show 2007 over 1/3 of live births were born to unwed Mothers.Other plans leave out over 15 million people. Your plan is the only one that addresses the babies provider. She has to be healthy too. We know the American public will vote for you in November because you are the only one that has the strength and energy to get the job done. That is a good +benefit about a workaholic.
Keep going forward, 17 million people have your back.
But NOBAMA!!!!
Big - Huge mistake. She is a very complex lady. She is almost like Eleanor Roosevelt reincarnated.
Hillary is so prepared and capable of being president at this difficult time in history that I can not accept that she will not win.
In contrast, Obama has frequently said that now is his time. Maybe, later,when his negative relationships are better known.
Now I can only accept Hillary. If the RNC does not endorse, I must then vote for McCain. Not good but at least I know who he really is.
God Bless America.
Another story the media is holding
back on!!!
has lost their credibility.
Another story the media is holding
back on!!!
Not. Eleanor Roosevelt cared about the person, first and foremost.
Hillary cares about Hillary. Big Difference!
The stuff that Obama admitted to in the two books he
wrote is enough to lose him the election. But has
anyone heard anything about either of these writings
by a major National Television Station????
NO! Because they are setting on it until Hillary is
out of the picture and Obama will lose the Presidency
by the largest margine yet. And anyone who can''t
see that and continues to believe otherwise after
reading those two books is being FOOLISH!!!!
The stuff that Obama admitted to in the two books he
wrote is enough to lose him the election. But has
anyone heard anything about either of these writings
by a major National Television Station????
NO! Because they are setting on it until Hillary is
out of the picture and Obama will lose the Presidency
by the largest margine yet. And anyone who can''t
see that and continues to believe otherwise after
reading those two books is being FOOLISH!!!!
The stuff that Obama admitted to in the two books he
wrote is enough to lose him the election. But has
anyone heard anything about either of these writings
by a major National Television Station????
NO! Because they are setting on it until Hillary is
out of the picture and Obama will lose the Presidency
by the largest margine yet. And anyone who can''t
see that and continues to believe otherwise after
reading those two books is being FOOLISH!!!!
It would be UN-Democratic to not seat their Delegates.
It would be UN-Democratic to not give Hillary Clinton the Delegates proportionate to the votes that she won.
It would be an insult to our intelligence to suggest a 50/50 split or anything less than the delegates Hillary Clinton was given by the vote of the people.
We are well aware that Barack Obama went out of his way to remove his name from the Michigan ballet in an attempt to nullify our votes.
We are well aware that Obama contacted his campaign workers in Michigan and had them urge voters to mark the "none of the above" box on the ballet. He asked them to hold rallys and make radio announcements in an attempt to steal votes from Hillary Clinton.
We are aware that thousands of Hillary Clinton supporters did not even vote in response to being told their vote would not count.
We are well aware that it was Obama himself who denied Michigan and Florida the chance to have a re-vote.
Don''t make us the Democratic Party that decided the American Flag would go back to having only 48 stars.
Obama: The Con
Obama has fixed this race by deception to Americans. He has lied about his background and his connections with radical, Anti American, anti semitic leaders until just a few months ago. He has hidden his relationship with Reverend Wright,, Farrakhan, the %u201CNation of Islam%u2019 leader, Syrian Criminal, Anton Rezko and his Black Liberation Theology since the beginning of the primary. Most of my community have changed their minds about this man and will not vote for him in the general election because of this lies and deception
This whole election process, especially not seating Florida and Michigan with almost 400 delegates, is a disgrace for the American people. John King keep showing his map with only 48 states. These maps and math are convincing superdelegates that Obama is in the lead. There are 50 states in our country. Obama has done everything in his power to convince everyone that there is only 48 by not having a revote or even seating them. The postponement of seating these state is a deliberate act. Senator Obmama is deliberately postponing this decision to brag about his lead.
For those people that were too young to know President Clinton.He is not liked, but loved through out the world. Our country was thriving, the era was "upbeat" and there was peace in our country.
There is no way to compare "Bush" and Clinton. The Clintons were the BEST!
The media has painted President Clinton as a racist in spite of the fact that he has an office in Harlem His years in office were spent fighting for civil rights and for the underdog, especially African American.
The coverage of this campaign is disgraceful in this regard above all. African Americans should be ashamed of how they have treated all of the Clintons.
Trinity United Church of Christ, Tony Rezko the Syrian Criminal, Louis Farrakhan, William Ayers a 60%u2019s radical that bombed government buildings and Muslim upbringing should be a wake up call to Democrats. Please don''t blow the change with a man that has not only little known about these issues before the first primary and kept it away from the media until the end of this race. Senator Obama will lose this election if he''s the nominee. Lastly and something that needs to be evaluated is the race issue; There will never be a fair an accurate poll determining how many people will really vote for Obama. McCain will win if the Democrats don''t wake up.
On the January 21 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.''s Fox News Sunday, National Public Radio senior correspondent and Fox News contributor Juan Williams noted that Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) "comes from a father who was a Muslim" and added that "given that we''re at war with Muslim extremists, that presents a problem."
How much more bad news do we need to know about a Democrat candidate before we realize that this man is laughing up his sleeve at all of us.
Wake up Democrats. We can not and will not win this election unless we run from Obama and start supporting the Clintons.
Please keep the unsettling issues pertaining to Senator Obama in the forefront.
There are too many issues surrounding this man that disturbs many Americans and believe me, there will be many more to come.
Who do they think they are trying to decide the nomination without the voters!
ONLY THE FIRST TIME????
MAYBE????????!
In other words, *HILLARY IS WINNING* !!!!!
Atlantic Online
May 12,2008
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
-
by mvymvy
May 20, 2008 8:36 PM PDT
- The real issue is not how well Clinton, Obama, or McCain might do in closely divided battleground states, but that we shouldn%u2019t have battleground states and spectator states in the first place. Every vote in every state should be politically relevant in a presidential election. Every vote should be equal.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 36 CommentsThe National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states. The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The major shortcoming of the current system is that candidates have no reason to worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind, because the winner-take-all rule awards all of a state%u2019s electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved in legislative chambers in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, and Washington, Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont, and enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring the law into effect. See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com