Primary Source
April 10, 2008 8:53 PM

A Broken Trust? Congress Takes On The CDC

(CBS)
This post was written by Chief Investigative Correspondent Armen Keteyian and Investigative Producer Michael Rey.



As part of its continuing investigation into the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a major House subcommittee is now taking dead aim at whether “political pressure” caused the CDC to “scale down or cancel” beryllium testing in Elmore, Ohio, the subject of our exclusive investigation on the CBS Evening News.

In recent months the CDC has come under increasing pressure from agency insiders and other sources who question whether political or corporate pressure have resulted in “deficient, incomplete and/or muted reports, studies or Health Consultations.” Three cases stand out: what critics have called the CDC’s “indefensible handling” of the issue of formaldehyde in FEMA trailers; a study on toxic dumping sites in the Great Lakes region; and community testing for the toxic dust beryllium around Brush Wellman plant in Elmore.

In other words has a sacred trust between the nation’s top public health agency and the people it’s sworn to protect been broken?

In a stinging five-page letter sent yesterday to CDC Director Dr. Julie Gerberding, the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Investigations & Oversight, Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., came out swinging. He told Gerberding his committee had obtained documents [that] “raise serious questions about the influence politically-connected companies may have…on investigating this [beryllium testing] and other potential public health hazards.”

Miller’s letter also calls into question the actions of the president of Brush Wellman, which owned and operated the beryllium plant in Elmore, Ohio Gov. Bob Taft, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services Mike Leavitt, Gerberding and CDC Deputy Director Thomas Sinks.

Perhaps the most damning document cited in the committee letter is an internal background paper written on April 14, 2006 – just 11 days after Brush Wellman President Richard Hipple complained about CDC testing to Taft. The document, according to the letter, “acknowledges that ATSDR [the CDC’s toxic substance agency] did curtail its investigation at the behest of the industry.”

There’s more: The April 14 background paper also states: “ATSDR’s current proposal is scaled back significantly from the approach contemplated earlier, based in part on consideration of concerns raised by the County Commissioners and Brush Wellman…..and “ATSDR’s senior management will personally review all comments offered by the company and the county commissioners and ATSDR proposed responses to the comments.” According to the letter the man leading the agency’s handling of the investigation was Deputy Director Sinks.

The committee has requested a raft of records relating to the case and given the Gerberding until April 23, 2008, to deliver them. Not soon enough for many people in Elmore left wondering whether it’s safe to breath the air around the plant – or not.
Tags:
toxic dust ,
armen keteyian ,
congress ,
cdc
Topics:
Toxicity
Add a Comment
by andrewofg April 13, 2008 11:50 PM EDT
So this is a ~ 60 year old issue?
Is it news or is it history?
Or is it all about ratings?

Reply to this comment
by kittydrew April 12, 2008 9:58 PM EDT
Brush Wellman has been at this since World War II. Its dust emissions in Lorain, Ohio, killed at least a dozen people living or working in the vicinity of the plant there. Everyone looked the other way or dissembled.

The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Composition Program

Has paid out claims of $42 million to former Brush employees at 4 plants,--$26 million at Elmore--for employees'' death and disability from beryllium exposure. See the EEOICP website http://www.dol.gov/esa/regs/compliance/owcp/eeoicp/Statistics/oh.htm
Brush has fought and won about 200 lawsuits filed by sick employees and their survivors.
Beryllium has been characterized as THE most toxic substance in the workplace. Brush used to claim it was no more toxic than sugar.
Reply to this comment
by andrewofg April 12, 2008 5:11 PM EDT
I checked into this. It seems a little odd. The ''chemical'' they are talking about in this is a natural substance.
I guess, like anything, you need to avoid getting too much.
Sometimes they make it sound like mankind has created a new kind of poison.
This stuff has always been here.
Reply to this comment
by Martha Z April 12, 2008 3:41 PM EDT
It kind of makes you just want to pickup your bags and move to the woods somewhere! All these chemicals around us are eventually going to kill us off, slowly but surely, if we don''t speak up. We see it happening to animals and guess what, we are next on the food chain.
Reply to this comment
by andrewofg April 11, 2008 4:27 PM EDT
I''ve heard that you can test the air for this, and other substances.
Sorry, but I don''t think we should hang our well being on trust. We should hang it on data.
Doesn''t make for a very exciting story, but who needs that kind of excitement?
Drop the drama, get the data, report it without speculation, and move on.
History is not kind to sensless histrionics.
Reply to this comment
by chgo22phx April 11, 2008 1:14 AM EDT
Yet another government agency that is in collusion with big bidness. Since this administration has taken charge, anyone who really was a professional and who believed in the "sacred trust" was bounced out and everyone''s relatives who couldn''t get a real job got one. What''s next? I think that as the years go by, the citizens of country are in for a real shock as these kinds of stories come out. And they will. God help us.
Reply to this comment

About Primary Source

Only a handful of the hundreds of stories on which we report make their way to the Evening News with Katie Couric. So we have created this space as another primary source to keep you informed.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn