Horserace
April 3, 2008 10:46 AM

New North Carolina Debate Proposed For April 27th

A joint letter from the North Carolina Democratic Party and CBS News to the campaigns of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton proposes a 90-minute debate, to be aired live on April 27th from 8:00pm to 9:30pm. The North Carolina debate would follow CBS’ “60 Minutes.”

“We hope to make this debate weekend a true learning experience for North Carolinians,” the letter from the party states. “The audience would be a mix of your invited guests, North Carolina Democrats, students from our host school or schools and a few debate sponsors.” The debate would be moderated by CBS News’ Katie Couric and Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer.

More: “The North Carolina Democratic Party is excited about hosting you, your family, and your campaign for our debate with CBS. We hope to give as many North Carolina Democratic and unaffiliated voters as possible the chance to meet you and your families while you are in our state for the debate.” [emphasis in the original]

The letter, sent by the party, is signed by North Carolina Democratic chair Jerry Meek and CBS News president Sean McManus. An earlier proposal for a North Carolina debate on April 16th was initially accepted by Obama’s campaign.

Update: In a statement this afternoon, the Clinton campaign accepted the invitation: "The Clinton campaign today announced that Senator Hillary Clinton has accepted an invitation to participate in a debate in North Carolina on Sunday, April 27, sponsored by CBS."
Tags:
Debates ,
CBS News ,
North Carolina ,
Obama ,
Clinton
Topics:
Debates
Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by ocalasl April 5, 2008 10:25 PM EDT
The president of a prominent watchdog group said Wednesday that he believes Democratic presidential frontrunner Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) %u201Cintended to leave no paper trail%u201D during his time in the Illinois Senate.

Judicial Watch, which has been seeking access to Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton%u2019s (D-N.Y.) records from her time in the White House, argued Wednesday that the Illinois senator, who has criticized the former first lady for a lack of openness, has his own %u201Crecords problem.%u201D

%u201CThe more we learn about the Illinois Senator, the more obvious it becomes that he is anything but the ethically upright outsider he purports to be,%u201D said Tom Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch.
Reply to this comment
by anappleadae April 4, 2008 4:47 PM EDT
The candidates would be well advised to consentrate on Mc Cain rather than each other, because Dems are looking for the best candidate to oppose McCain. Based on Obama''s negative National Security issues Hillary is probably the better choise(less unsightly exposure). With Obama as the nominee it will be more entertaining for Repubilcans.
Reply to this comment
by paulmo43 April 4, 2008 10:16 AM EDT
I think a debate would be a great idea, but change the format just a little. Each candidate will have 5 minutes to discuss a topic like education reform, but they must give concrete details about their plans. A simple answer like ''I would push for higher standards for students'' will not be enough. They have to detail those standards not just name them.

Both candidates need to get more specific. Promises without a plan are just pipe dreams. We have too much of this.

Neither candidate would be given a list of topics and neither can get off topic. Let all of us see who is best at concise answers.

Stump speeches are alright to get acquainted with a candidate, but the devil is in the details.

Obama is great at speeches, but he does not seem to think on his feet very well. He hems and haws and sounds like he is making things up as he goes.

Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 4, 2008 2:20 AM EDT
DEQ54,

Let''s hope you''re not an Obama supporter, because dismissing someone because you think their Republican isn''t indicative of the change Obama talks so much about. With that said, I''m Democrat and for Obama. Contrary to what you may think, all Obama supporters are not by-products of a cookie-cutter design...some of us support him without the fainting spells, wet-behind the ears adulation, etc. Some of us support him simply because he isn''t in a skirt or subject to napping through intelligence briefings vital to the safety of our country. YOU vote for all the ldealistic reasons you hold Obama in such high-esteem and I''ll vote for him due to a simple deduction: He is clearly in the best interest of enhancing America more than that girl or geritol spokesman.
Reply to this comment
by deq54 April 4, 2008 1:36 AM EDT
Ignore BLKPRES--He''s a republican.
Reply to this comment
by anappleadae April 4, 2008 1:05 AM EDT
Blkpresident gives new meaning to the idea of boredom and has my sympathy for not being able to express itself.
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 3, 2008 10:53 PM EDT
clowery123,

It''s your vote. If you want to waste it on a lil'' woman or an OLD man, go ahead. Your loss. Remember that the next president had better have some military acumen and also a sense of sound economics. Missy and Grandpa are out!
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 3, 2008 10:48 PM EDT
mnmaid,

Just because lil'' Hillary has been on the political scene doesn''t mean she is to go to person to handle our sagging economy--must less manage two wars. She''s going to be just fine when she gets her apron back in her daily routine. Rather than presiding over an administration-cabinet she can clean and organize the cabinets above her kitchen stove.
Reply to this comment
by anappleadae April 3, 2008 7:53 PM EDT
BLACKSPIRIT

Are you confused? This a thread about a DEBATE!
Reply to this comment
by anappleadae April 3, 2008 7:50 PM EDT
It would be better if it were a General Election debate where all three candidates can illustrate what they will bring to the Presidency.
Reply to this comment
by deq54 April 3, 2008 7:15 PM EDT
mnmaid--I will not bad mouth your choice----I don''t know what your economic issues are--but my family can''t take much more of this meltdown--gas prices, food cost, evetything going up except wages. I will say that if she wins, I will be disappointed, but I will support her against John McCain. We must have a democrat in November--Are you prepared to do that if your candidate loses?
Reply to this comment
by karutam April 3, 2008 6:46 PM EDT
Enough of Debates!!! Come and talk to the people in person. Especially not one that has Couric as moderator. She is also turning people off, know why CBS news is last in its time slot?
Reply to this comment
by notopennshut April 3, 2008 6:43 PM EDT
Bravo smashw17! You''re right on the money! I am an older woman and in many ways ashamed of what I have seen seen in her too. It makes me feel that these "staunch" supporters are living in the past era, seeing that their main reason is that it''s time for a woman! No wonder they themselves were not able to forge ahead. The best should be chosen and not just the gender. We, as women will forever remain behind if we were to make our choices based solely on gender.
Reply to this comment
by blackspirit3 April 3, 2008 6:35 PM EDT
THE CLINTONS HAD A LIST OF THINGS TO ACCOMPLISH WHILE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court.

WHAT DID THEY FORGET TO DO?
Reply to this comment
by demwatcher April 3, 2008 6:35 PM EDT
Ooh, how absolutely exciting. A wooden plank facing a block of cement.
Reply to this comment
by deq54 April 3, 2008 6:28 PM EDT
I was a woman working as a carpenter in the field for msny yrs. I was held to a higher measure than my male counterparts. I don''t think that this automatically makes Hillary Clinton the candidate of choice. Instead of doing what the "good old boys" who built the glass ceiling have done--promote via gender--I am supporting the candidate I think would be the best. That candidate does not look like me, but he is the best candidate--Barack Obama. To support someone based on gender, is no different than the good old boys and in the case of choosing a President--a critical error.
Reply to this comment
by smashwl7 April 3, 2008 6:24 PM EDT
Obama has never bragged about his experience, he always talked about judgment. I have to admit he does not have perfect judgment on everything either. However, Hillary is the one that brags about her experience to be President. Now let%u2019s look at Hillary%u2019s judgment as potential Commander and Chief.

Hillary%u2019s judgment should one again be called into question!

1st: It was staying with Bill for political gain even after the abuse of sexual indiscretions.

2nd: The war in Iraq vote!

3rd: Agreeing to sign up for the rules that were stated by the DNC in respect to Florida and Mich.

4th: Destroying the Democratic Party for her win at all cost policy.

5th: Slashing and Bashing Obama and then wanting him to be her running mate.

6th: Financial handling of campaign funds spent over 100 million during Iowa campaign.

7th: Lying about Bosnia and Sniper Fire.

8th Not taking Obama serious as a contender for President, she thought she had it in the bag from the beginning

And this is who you want as President, come on women of America look at who you are supporting. It her judgment that needs be the #1 issue of this campaign. She has poor judgment that is the bottom line issue for all of us to examine

Reply to this comment
by mannie49 April 3, 2008 5:29 PM EDT
Hilliary needs to get all of her lies straight before she debates again. She has shown me that she is full of it and will do anything to get to the oval office. What does Obama have to apologize to her for? She needs to apologize to all of the real casualties of war who really was confronted with sniper fire. STOP HATIN!!
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 3, 2008 5:22 PM EDT
besscannon,

Where I appreciate your true comments that if not for a woman none of us would have been born; however, wasn''t it a lil'' woman like lil'' Hillary who ate the forbidden fruit?

We are a nation at war, so America doesn''t need missy or grandpa at this juncture in our history. We want to win those two wars--not nap through with a "blankie" and geritol nor do we want to offer a foreign policy akin to donning an apron and stirring a cake mixing bowl. It''s really that simple. A man is needed at the helm--not an OLD man mind you but a MAN nevertheless. Sorry ''bout your lil'' pipedream missy.
Reply to this comment
by canislupus16 April 3, 2008 5:11 PM EDT
At this point, I doubt too that there is much to debate as far as real issue and policy differences between Clinton and Obama are concerned. If you don''t know by now, you''ve been asleep. It will give Clinton a chance to sling more mud, though (I''m a former STRONG supporter of Clinton). Otherwise, Couric as a "moderator"? One of the worst if not THE worst interviewer in all media. Lobs softballs, doesn''t know the issues and correct answers, is unprepared, and doesn''t follow up. Hardball she''s not.
Reply to this comment
See all 33 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn