Horserace
March 31, 2008 4:13 PM

Rating The Running Mates

(CBS/AP)
Picking a running mate is serious business in spite of the often carnival-like atmospherics that can accompany it. Clandestine meeting with prospective candidates, endless speculation and jockeying among various boosters aside, it's generally the first major decision made by two individuals auditioning for the job of running the country.

"The first consideration is to find a candidate who won't do you any harm," former Senator George Mitchell tells Katie Couric on tonight's "Evening News." After that, the specifications of what makes a good running mate are as different as the presumptive nominees themselves (watch tonight's Evening News show for the full report).

Who are some of those potential candidates now surfacing? Let's take a look at some of them and what they potentially bring to the table for the candidates. Let us know what you think about the list and who else should be considered and why either in the comments section or Email us here. And remember, this process is just beginning and these names will change over time.

The decision facing presumptive GOP nominee John McCain thus far has spurred the most speculation for obvious reasons. Conventional wisdom suggests that McCain needs to balance the ticket in several key areas – he needs a conservative to soothe his relations with a key part of the GOP base, someone from outside of Washington to counter his years spent in the U.S. Senate and someone younger who can be seen as a future standard-bearer for the party.

A tall order and few candidates fulfill all those perceived needs. Some don't fill any of them yet still bring a certain rationale. Here's who's getting the most attention thus far:

Mitt Romney: While the two had bitter exchanges during the GOP primary, Romney and McCain have quickly come together and the former Massachusetts governor has all but publicly announced his availability. On the plus side, Romney became popular among conservatives during the primary, fills a policy hole in McCain's resume on economic issues and could help put Michigan into play this fall. Downsides include Romney's failure to take advantages of his huge financial advantages in the primary and lingering questions about authenticity and his the impact of his religion.

Tim Pawlenty: The Governor of Minnesota was one of McCain's earliest and most dedicated supporters and one of the party's rising stars. Having been elected where Democrats have held in recent elections, he would certainly put his home state into play and it doesn't hurt that the GOP convention will take place in Minneapolis. The downside may be that Pawlenty is young, maybe too young and too unknown to thrust onto the national stage.

Mark Sanford: Another youthful governor who could energize conservatives, the South Carolinian also shares McCain's disdain for government spending (he once brought a pair of live pigs into the statehouse to protest "pork" spending in the state). But Sanford doesn't help McCain geographically in any meaningful way. If the Republican nominee is in trouble in South Carolina, he's in trouble everywhere.

Rob Portman: The former Ohio congressman and OMB director fills a great many of McCain's needs. He shores up perceived weaknesses in McCain's economic knowledge, hails from a key state and is considerably younger than the nominee. But he lacks star power in a campaign that has been dominated by personalities, something that could be damaging depending upon who ends up filling out the Democratic ticket.

Charlie Crist: On paper, the Florida governor is almost certain to make McCain's short list. His endorsement of McCain just prior to Florida's primary helped begin the process of wrapping up the nomination. Crist is wildly popular in an immensely important state and holds many positions to soothe conservatives. He is viewed suspiciously among some in the party on social issues but is certain to get a lot of attention in coming weeks and months.

Mike Huckabee: The former Arkansas governor hung in against McCain longer than any of his rivals and became a near household name in the process. Huckabee would help McCain among social conservatives, particularly evangelicals. But he never was able to become much more than a regional candidate within a region that should already be strong Republican territory in November.

Condoleezza Rice: President Bush's Secretary of State has long been a figure buzzed about as a potential presidential candidate and, should Barack Obama win the Democratic nomination, would be a tempting way to offer both a counter to black voters and to women. But Rice's identification with the war in Iraq one place McCain does not need help. An all-war ticket is probably not a winner in November.

Kay Bailey Hutchison: The Texas Senator's name has popped up from time to time in the search for a Republican woman who might appeal to Hillary Clinton voters feeling left out should she not end up with the nomination or on the ticket. But such sole considerations are unlikely to win the day in filling out the ticket. Coming from both the Senate and a state Republicans should win might keep her off the short list.

Trying to come up with a list of Democratic names is a lot harder, only because the two candidates must come first regardless of who ends up at the top of the ticket. Despite speculation that neither Clinton nor Obama would take the number two spot, there may end up being a lot of pressure on them to do just that. A party divided along lines of race, gender and economic and educational stations in life may be better healed with a unity ticket. Not to mention the collective "huh?" that might greet any other arrangement by an electorate already used to the idea of two such historic candidacies. If not, the list will begin growing immediately. Here are a just a few names already being whispered:

Ted Strickland: The governor of Ohio will be on either candidate's list. Already sensing an opportunity in a state where Republicans have been scarred by a series of local political scandals, Strickland would put a dagger in GOP hopes of pulling out this all-important state. Relatively unknown nationally, Strickland still has to be a major player in the selection process.

Bill Richardson: Having been called a "Judas" by one of Clinton's highes profile supporters for endorsing Obama, Richardson would be a more likely choice for Obama who will need to find inroads with Hispanics should he win the nomination. But Richardson's own less-than-inspiring campaign did little to give Democrats confidence about his ability to play on the big stage.

Tim Kaine: Democrats see Virginia as a red state they can win in 2008 and putting the governor on the ticket for either candidate would be an interesting gambit. He's also not from Washington, another benefit for both. But if Virginia is in play anyway, does either need him to take it?

Evan Bayh: Once thought of a strong presidential candidate in his own right, the Indiana senator would help the ticket not only in his home state but potentially throughout the entire Midwest. As a moderate, Bayh also could help blunt expected criticisms by Republicans that the Democratic nominee will be a typical "liberal" regardless of which one wins.

Joe Biden: With over 30 years spend in the U.S. Senate, Biden is not the perfect running mate for either, but would likely only be considered by Obama. After a primary campaign where he has been routinely criticized for his lack of experience, Biden is just the kind of elder statesman who might help soothe those concerns.

Both lists will grow and evolve over time as the process continues and the relative strengths and weaknesses are examined and discussed. Who else should be on the list? Let us know.
Tags:
Clinton ,
Obama ,
McCain ,
Crist ,
Pawlenty ,
Romney ,
Bayh
Topics:
VP Sweepstakes
Add a Comment See all 42 Comments
by jimhale4 March 31, 2008 5:53 PM PDT
Can''t believe you left off Colin Powell as a possible running mate for Obama.
Solves Obama''s national security weakness. Would tick off some liberal dems but help Obama in the middle.
Avoids risk of a salt and pepper motivated assassination...something that should concern us all. There are still a lot of racist nuts out there: witness all the opposition to Latino immigrants and the fierce reaction to Rev. Wright.
Powell advised Obama before his run and has made it clear to anyone who is really listening that he''s available.
He could satisfy the lefties by one speech condemning Bush/Cheney. A recently conducted national poll shows him to be the most admired endorser.
Reply to this comment
by jimhale4 March 31, 2008 6:09 PM PDT
Can''t believe you left off Colin Powell as a possible running mate for Obama.
Solves Obama''s national security weakness. Would tick off some liberal dems but help Obama in the middle.
Avoids risk of a salt and pepper motivated assassination...something that should concern us all. There are still a lot of racist nuts out there: witness all the opposition to Latino immigrants and the fierce reaction to Rev. Wright.
Powell advised Obama before his run and has made it clear to anyone who is really listening that he''s available.
He could satisfy the lefties by one speech condemning Bush/Cheney. A recently conducted national poll shows him to be the most admired endorser.
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident March 31, 2008 7:01 PM PDT
Here''s some free advice to the last three presidential contenders in regards to choosing a vice-president to round out their ticket.

We''ll save the best for last, so let''s start with OLD man McCain:

He would improve his chances dramatically by selecting the likes of Governor Crist of Florida or ex-rival Mitt Romney.

Lil Hillary IF (note BIG if) she wins the nomination (smirk, smirk, smirk--not happening)but to increase her viability she may want to consider former General Wesley Clark, former US Senator Sam Nunn(D)GA; Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter or Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

Now, to the best: Anyone Obama chooses will be suffice. Obama can carry the ticket all by himself. The Obama shuffle would have even KO''d Rocky Marciano. The Obama shuffle has already steamrolled Lil'' Hillary and word on the street is that OLD man McCain is ducking and hiding from the Obama shuffle behind Lil'' Hillary''s apron.
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 31, 2008 7:16 PM PDT
Kay Bailey Hutchinson is really dirty politics she should be in jail. That''s a big NO. Any of the other republican candidates sound good, except Romney.

I''d like to see Hillary pick a strong foreign rellations person as her VP, but Richardson just pixxed his carrer righ off the top of the deck. Joe Biden, nope, either of the governors would do.

If Obama gets the nomination, sorry, if Hillary''s not on the ticket to tell him what to do, he''s a lost cause.

Reply to this comment
by tlobe March 31, 2008 8:40 PM PDT
You failed to consider Gov Bob Riley of Alabama. McCain would do well to give him a close look. He has been an oustanding governor. He has helped lure several large manufacturers to the state: Hyundai, Thysen-Krupp, Kia (though just across the state line in Georgia), and a host of other subsidiary manufacturers. Alabama''s unemployment rate has been near or below the national average. He has been able to work with the Democrat-controlled state legislature without any deeply engrained divisiveness. He is a former congressman. He ran a successful business before entering the politcal arena. Gov Riley presents himself well in public events and has not been subject to harsh personal attacks in any of his campaigns.
Reply to this comment
by emelder March 31, 2008 10:27 PM PDT
What about John Edwards (and doesn''t he bring delegates to the table, to quicken the front-runner status, hopefully for O''Bama)? Maybe former Sen. Bill Bradley.
Reply to this comment
by efarris38 March 31, 2008 10:39 PM PDT
Well the only one that I see on your short list is Senator Evan Bayh of Indiana. Let em tell you why.....he has been a TWO TERM GOVERNOR of Indiana, he has served in his second term as US Senator from Indiana, and an Indianpolis Star Poll a few months back say people from the Hoosier State would support the Democrtic Ticket over the Republican by over 20 points if Senator Bayh was on the ticket. I have no doubt that Senator Bayh would be competent, experienced and also bring his credentials as a former Gov and yes a moderate to balance out a ticket. Senator Bayh would be a win win either way for the Democrats. As for McCain, I can only say I think he needs a Washington outsider, maybe a southern Gov in which he does have a few to choose from......SENATOR BAYH is the BEST BET!!!
Reply to this comment
by conspiracygirl April 1, 2008 1:15 AM PDT
McCain should consider choosing Ron Paul simply because Ron Paul is right about the economy and about the war, whereas McCain is wrong. McCain even knows he is clueless about the economy, as was demonstrated during the debates. So, McCain would still get what he wants %u2013 power %u2013 but without looking like such a fool, and Ron Paul would get what he wants %u2013 to save the nation from self-destructing....

Reply to this comment
by tulcak April 1, 2008 2:28 AM PDT
this is your shortlist? man, are you clueless... perhaps this is a list you would like to see. on the republican side, you''ve picked the obvious, but wrong people for VP. on the democratic side, you don''t have a clue.
Reply to this comment
by nwihoosier April 1, 2008 9:29 AM PDT
Peace and Love
tulcak, you''re not being constructive. Learn to play nice. Help someone today, you''ll feel better.
Peace and Love
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 April 1, 2008 9:40 AM PDT
Forget about choosing a VP. Lets throw out the presidential candidates and get someone who deserves to run. I want Ron PAUL
Reply to this comment
by ranger1948 April 1, 2008 10:12 AM PDT
blk p[resident
I see you have escaped again and are off your meds
Reply to this comment
by jgunther7 April 1, 2008 10:34 AM PDT
My first inclination was to say Edwards, however he doesn%u2019t have the guts to take a stand until he knows who the winner is. Not exactly a profile in courage. That leaves Bill Richardson, Jim Webb and many more. The Democrats have so many good candidates to chose from it will be a very difficult decision. What a wonderful position to be in. Viva Obama
Reply to this comment
by jgunther7 April 1, 2008 10:49 AM PDT
The Republicans needn%u2019t bother
Reply to this comment
by extremophil April 1, 2008 11:10 AM PDT
Obama will no doubt pick Oprah. Then we''ll have two Ovaries in the race.
Reply to this comment
by az4mitt April 1, 2008 11:47 AM PDT
NO Mitt, NO Money. M&M ticket all the way!
Reply to this comment
by blkpresident April 1, 2008 11:55 AM PDT
Extremeophil,

Contrary to your implications that somehow by linking Obama with Oprah "you get two ovaries", please don''t let his skinny frame fool you. If Obama had been a boxer they would have called him "the Steamroller" as in he''s steamrolling that lil'' woman Hillary and will steamroll OLD man McCain too. Furthermore, the Obama shuffle could have tangled with the likes of Rocky Marciano and I''m sure he can hold his own with Clint Eastwood in his prime. Obama is a MAN with a plan!
Reply to this comment
by mudrose-2009 April 1, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
Oprah is a good choice for B. Hussein Obama. When he starts to stutter because he''s gone off script, Oprah can segway into recommending his book "The Audacity of Hoax" to detract from his shortcomings.
Reply to this comment
by gdmoore2 April 1, 2008 12:07 PM PDT
Obama will make a great VP for Hillary Clinton. He will have 16 years to transform American politics, while Hillary gets the immediate necessities accomplished.
Reply to this comment
by miles1967-2009 April 1, 2008 12:26 PM PDT
Barack Obama and Jim Webb

http://webb.senate.gov/

Reply to this comment
by sean5002 April 1, 2008 12:44 PM PDT
Obama/Gore 08 .would be great.

Gore can use this top position to really get around and bring attention to the environment.

Getting the position as VP and going about his cause certainly beats being a civilian and trying to do it.

If not Gore, Obama/and the talented senator from Missouri Claire McCaskill; who happens to be his good friend, can be magic too.
Reply to this comment
by beader59 April 1, 2008 12:56 PM PDT
I just love the Obama/Gore suggestion, like Gore would be a VP under Obama...get real!
Reply to this comment
by sean5002 April 1, 2008 1:12 PM PDT
I just love the Obama/Gore suggestion, like Gore would be a VP under Obama...get real!

Posted by beader59 at 12:56 PM : Apr 01, 2008
+

Has nothing to do with being under someone, had Gore been in the race then thats a different story.

Gore is just hanging out not doing much these days ,If i was him, and it was offer to me I''ll take it ,afterall it doesn''t reguire much work, and you get the similar treatment like the president. not a bad gig if you can get it.

The heavy lifting/campaign has being carried out by barack for over a year now.
Reply to this comment
by bdribus April 1, 2008 1:18 PM PDT
Huckabee is the man.
Reply to this comment
by aldon61 April 1, 2008 1:23 PM PDT
BLKPRESIDENT: I believe I told you Obama would actually carry Texas; he has 5 more delegates than "lil" Hillary. This could also be increased at the state convention in June. Don''t ever count Texas in "lil" Hillary''s fold, we know better!
Reply to this comment
by shelbycares April 1, 2008 1:47 PM PDT
bdribus:

Huckabee would be the worst possible choice. He is the ONLY VP "contender" that is on the list of TOP TEN MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS of 2007 (along with Prez candidates Hillary Clinton and Obama) on Judicial Watch''s list. Why should McCain have a running mate with ethics problems. Besides that, Huckabeen raised a son who tortures animals (stoned and hung a dog to death).

No SCARY HUCKABEEN for VP!
Reply to this comment
by texaskaoscom April 1, 2008 1:48 PM PDT
"Oprah is a good choice for B. Hussein Obama. When he starts to stutter because he''''s gone off script, Oprah can segway into recommending his book "The Audacity of Hoax" to detract from his shortcomings.

Posted by mudrose at 12:03 PM : Apr 01, 2008"

Mudrose, I have to admit that this time (& only once) did I find your comments amusing and lyrically effective.

Usually, you are, well, muddy at best. Did you plagarize a more eloquent rightwing moron or did you just get lucky? I suppose donkeys will be flying next.

Quantum mechanics says stranger things are possible than a winger coming up with something interesting. Who am I to fight the laws of physics?

I congratulate you, mudrose. It was bound to happen. It''s a shame though that your eloquence will be lost in your ever shrinking 19% klan.

And yes, I did mean "donkeys are flying" b/c afterall they are, aren''t they?

While the pachyderms sink in their own mud....
Reply to this comment
by texaskaoscom April 1, 2008 1:56 PM PDT
"Gore is just hanging out not doing much these days ,If i was him, and it was offer to me I''''ll take it ,afterall it doesn''''t reguire much work, and you get the similar treatment like the president. not a bad gig if you can get it.

The heavy lifting/campaign has being carried out by barack for over a year now."

Posted by sean5002 at 01:12 PM : Apr 01, 2008

----------------------------

Um, no offense, guy, but WHAT are you smoking??

Gore is not doing much of anything?? Just hanging out??

Um, can someone say "Nobel Peace Prize"? or "Saving the planet"?

I love Obama, but statements like "The heavy lifting has [been] carried out by barack" is the kind of stuff that diminishes the incredible amount of work others have been doing for years.

That can build the kind of unfair IMHO animosity towards a "young upstart" like Obama that can keep him from making the change we really need him to make.

Apologies for any offense. My jaw just dropped to the floor when I read your comments.
Reply to this comment
by jgunther7 April 1, 2008 2:32 PM PDT
If Hillary wins she should select her old friend and supporter Eliot Spitzer. He is out of work now and needs a job, and he and Bill Clinton will hit it off exchanging old whare stories. If Hillary wins the country is going to hell in a bucket anyway.
Reply to this comment
by sean5002 April 1, 2008 3:06 PM PDT
Um, no offense, guy, but WHAT are you smoking??

Gore is not doing much of anything?? Just hanging out??

Um, can someone say "Nobel Peace Prize"? or "Saving the planet"?

I love Obama, but statements like "The heavy lifting has [been] carried out by barack"

Posted by TexasKaosCom at 01:48 PM : Apr 01, 2008
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What are you talking about???.
We all know Gore win the Peace prize.That has nothing to do with what i am saying.Is Gore in Public office... the answer is NO!!!. Thats the point i was making with him ''just hanging out''.

Now if he gets offer the VP job , he will now have a quote on quote real job.. that will able him more to peddle his environment awareness.

And when i said Barack doing the heavy lifting. maybe you didn''t or cant comprehend what i text. He has been on the campaign trail for over a year now, you remember he is trying to run for office.

What else do you think i am talking about.
Reply to this comment
by gunownerdan April 1, 2008 3:25 PM PDT
Ron Paul was America''s only hope for a better future.
Reply to this comment
by mjvw2 April 1, 2008 4:31 PM PDT
and Al Gore did invent the internet. He''ll fit right in with either of these two.
Reply to this comment
by karutam April 1, 2008 6:14 PM PDT
Let''s not put the cart b4 the horse! Let us focus on the nominee. The reason that Obama is the right person at the right time is because we are in a different era, we need new ideas, new blood, and someone who can help unite us and move us ahead. Sure, there are many many older and experienced people, and they will be around to support and advise and provide the kind of background for informed decisions. But the young must now lead. Look at those companies that have forged ahead. New ideas, new blood, not forsaking the old, but incorporating them in the forward movement in the years to come.
Reply to this comment
by lauren0211 April 1, 2008 7:37 PM PDT
Bill Richardson is a traitor. He would not be where he was and is if it were not for the Clintons.
Plus they were friends. He should not be consudred for VP and Chris Dodd is a horses _____. Loser.
I wish C.Rice would switch parties. She would be right up there at Hillary''s level. Smart, lots of new idea and outspoken.
Obama and Hillary runing together.
forget about it. That would never work. Two much tension under the bridge. I''ll vote for Hillary but may switch to McCain if Obama gets nominated as front runner.
He is too much about himself and too intertwined with his militant church members. Who wants that as our Leader....GO HILLARY!!
Reply to this comment
by lauren0211 April 1, 2008 7:44 PM PDT
OPRAH, shut up!!
Reply to this comment
by April 1, 2008 9:49 PM PDT
Democrat, former Senator, former Governor, now President of University, David Boren, Oklahoma.
But only if Obama is the nominee. Both are uniters capable of bringing people together from opposite camps. Only way Dems carry Oklahoma.--

Republicans? Colin Powell or J.C. Watts, Jr. or Condi Rice. Gotta cut into that black monolithic vote Obama OWNS.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 April 1, 2008 10:02 PM PDT
Since the list pertains entirelt to McCain(with the lone exception of Joe Biden), it should be noted that McCain''s choice of running is laready clear as day,

Joe Lieberman.
Reply to this comment
by gouldnen April 1, 2008 10:07 PM PDT
Pawlenty does nothing to help McCain take California. Rommey and Bloomberg does. They also help with fund raising, and the econemy which is going to the be biggest issue in the Campain. The Dems are not going to be able to use the Iraq War as the trump card in this election. Huckabee would help in the south and with Conservatives, but, Pawenly doesn''t help at all. Pawlenty couldn''t even deliver Minnesota to McCain. Romney won Minnesota, with Huckabee second.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 April 1, 2008 10:10 PM PDT
lauren0211,

1.)Oprah has shut up. She made an endorsement and a few early appearances and has since exited the stage.

Now, if Bubba would just shut up!

2.) Bill Richardson saved Clinton''s cookies with North Korea. As a matterof fact, he did the same for Bush.

He was chosen as Energy Secretary by Clinton because he was considered to be the most qualified candidate. He doesn''t owe any more to Bubba than any other employee owes their ex-boss.

To call someone a traitor for exercising their right to support the candidate they believe will do the best for the country shows what an *** you are.

Richardson knows both candidates much better than we do and perhaps he knows exactly what he''s doing.
Reply to this comment
by realpatriot1 April 1, 2008 10:13 PM PDT
Lauren0211,

Hillary & Condi could run against MCCain on a platform of staying in Iraq 200 Years!
Reply to this comment
by gouldnen April 1, 2008 10:52 PM PDT
Pawlenty does nothing to help McCain take California. Rommey and Bloomberg does. They also help with fund raising, and the econemy which is going to the be biggest issue in the Campain. The Dems are not going to be able to use the Iraq War as the trump card in this election. Huckabee would help in the south and with Conservatives, but, Pawenly doesn''t help at all. Pawlenty couldn''t even deliver Minnesota to McCain. Romney won Minnesota, with Huckabee second.
Reply to this comment
by cattlekate April 2, 2008 9:11 AM PDT
Obama/Biden
Reply to this comment
See all 42 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented