From The Road
February 29, 2008 5:16 PM

Senator Clinton Says Obama has been “Missing In Action”

(CBS)
From CBS News' Fernando Suarez:

WACO, TEXAS -- Hillary Clinton delivered a national security speech this afternoon where she brought in to question Barack Obama’s ability to handle military issues if he’s elected president.

“There’s a big difference between giving speeches on national security and giving orders as commander-in-chief,” Clinton said. “There’s a big difference between delivering a speech at an anti-war rally as a state senator and picking up that phone in the White House at 3 a.m. in the morning to deal with an international crisis. Senator Obama talks about these issues but when it came time to act he was missing in action.”

Clinton’s sharp tone comes days before the March 4 primary here in Texas, a state once seen as a Clinton stronghold but is now a dead heat. For weeks Clinton has been focusing on the experience issue saying when it comes to national security and the war in Iraq, Obama falls short.

“There’s a difference between making a speech when you have no responsibility and having to step up and take charge and take responsibility for your actions,” Clinton said referring to her vote to authorize President Bush to go to war in Iraq in 2002 and Obama’s anti-war speech before he was elected to the U.S. Senate.

Clinton also accused Obama of being all talk and no action.

“He was missing in action when he failed to show up for a vote dealing with Iran. He was missing in action when he failed to hold a single substantive hearing on a committee he chaired that had responsibility for Europe and NATO and NATO’s policy in Afghanistan.”

Clinton added, “It is one thing to talk about change it is another thing to make change happen.”

Although there was a large crowd who turned out to listen to Clinton, the floor in this large convention center was noticeably empty.

When asked why Clinton chose Waco to deliver her national security remarks, a campaign aide close to the campaign tells CBS News, “Texas is a big military state, and national security is a major issue in this area... National security is always an issue in presidential campaigns; Democrats need a candidate who will engage forcefully, not whine about it.”

Clinton’s comments come on the same day her campaign released a 30-second TV ad advertisement that features children sleeping, while a telephone is ringing. A voice says, “It’s 3 a.m. and your children are safe and asleep. Who do you want answering the phone?”

Obama's campaign just released their version of that ad, using the same pictures of children sleeping. "When that call gets answered, shouldn’t the president be the one – the only one – who had judgment and courage to oppose the Iraq war from the start."


Tags:
Clinton
Topics:
Hillary Clinton
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 11 Comments
by girlinvt-2009 March 1, 2008 7:14 PM EST
When you vote present 130 times it gives you the ability to say you never voted for it in the first place..*** that sounds familar oh I forgot the king of hind sight is now saying that isnt he well imagine that
Reply to this comment
by mahsh-2009 March 1, 2008 6:21 AM EST
If campaign strategy is an indicator of what a candidate would function like in office, then Hillary really misses the mark.

From Day One:
__She boasts her role as First Lady as credentials for running the country, yet stalls disclosing her First Lady documents from the White House so that voters could be informed for themselves.

__She boasts being so experienced, yet the very execution of her campaign has been below-the-belt, non-disclosure, and aimless strategy making that arrogantly underestimates her opponents.

__She claims Obama missing in action, when in fact, ALL of the presidential candidates have been Missing in Action, while globe trotting for votes, including Hillary herself.

__She claims she is tried and tested, yet the "inexperienced" Obama gets right under her skin like nothing, bubbling up her multiple personalities ....just by being himself.

__She complains about adverse media coverage, yet is actually the one who INITIATES negativity, such as: saying Obama only won SC because he''s black, which alienated black voters that were in her corner; plagiarism charges that not only turned out to be false, but that she turned right around and actually did herself in her heralded debate closing statement; chides Obama for NAFTA mailers, yet she has sent mailers and TV ads out against him, etc.

__She claims her GENDER entitles her to women''s votes.

Obama gets positive coverage, because he''s running a positive campaign, while she isn''t.
Reply to this comment
by wutuloadu March 1, 2008 4:31 AM EST
I can only imagine Hillary being awake at 3:00am with her ear stuck to a glass and the wall listening from another room on her fat-puffy-red-faced (joke for an ex-president)husband begging for or performing some nasty degrading cheap sexual trick with another aimless Clintonite employee they always seem to attract.
Ok, maybe some willing consenting trailer trash instead, but who cares ?....it''s 3:00am in the morning and something IMPORTANT is going on in thier world !

Reply to this comment
by kenbomc March 1, 2008 3:09 AM EST
''Directors cut'' of Hillary''s TV ad.
Everyone should take a look -very informative;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KrWHrbq1uE4
Reply to this comment
by naehill March 1, 2008 2:53 AM EST
Just take a closer look at this guys record.....she''s by far more qualified than Obama. Anyone who is as charming as he, can not give direct answers and turns down an invitation to the State of the Black Union in New Orleans, after Louisiana came through for him in the primary......he is not to be trusted.
Reply to this comment
by notbuynit February 29, 2008 11:56 PM EST
Hillary , you suck! I was on your side up until very recently. you have proven that you are no better than Bush. Fear mongering ***! I will vote for McCain or Nader over you now. Never again for senate,. You are beyond contempt now for your fear ads!BUSH ***!
Reply to this comment
by nazirp February 29, 2008 11:05 PM EST
That hillary''s ad is actually good. I don''t think that Bill and Hillary spend much time together - that is
in bed. I can just see just visual Hiilary simply napping at the Oval Office Desk. So she would be ready to answer a call at 3 in the morning. Heck she would be ready to take a call at any time. The nation
would be well served by this workaholic. As a NY Senator she has done a lot for the State. She would no doubt do well for the whole nation.
That was some profile coverage on Hillary on CBS news this evening. And she is certainly qualified to be a President.
Reply to this comment
by croft777 February 29, 2008 10:38 PM EST
He''s an id*iot. Not voting on issues with a yes or no tells me hes not going to be working on nothing except on his azz.
Reply to this comment
by unimigrant February 29, 2008 10:05 PM EST
Some people are having a wild goose chase for nothing,i beleave is time to wake up.America cant afford to take a chance again.Obama is the one and only candidate i beleaves and trusted.Go Obama
Reply to this comment
by ecmd2 February 29, 2008 9:32 PM EST
If he''s not using the power he currently has in the Senate to address these issues, then what makes us think he will use the power he has if elected President to address the issues?
Reply to this comment
by geisler5 February 29, 2008 8:54 PM EST
I think Obama''s answer is ridiculous and is not relevant, because he is forgetting something : he was not in the Senate when the vote on Iraq took place. So how could he have voted against the war ? He is lying again, and deceiving people. I''m sure a lot of voters still believe he was a senator in 2003 because he has managed to make everybody believe he was.
Democrats : wake up ! It''s not to late : support Hillary !
Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments

About From The Road

Description for From the Road