Public Eye
August 2, 2006 3:36 PM

Responding To Rumor

(AP / CBS)
Rumors on the Internet seem to be pretty much a permanent part of the whole "new media" landscape. So questions about how mainstream news organizations handle them when they reach a fever pitch have come up before and will come up again. Well, one rumor was prolific enough in the blogosphere (and on everyone’s other favorite repository of unsubstantiated speculation, talk radio) that three news agencies decided to respond to it publicly. And more than a few newspapers published their response. The speculation, which originated on the blog EU Referendum was that photographers from the Associated Press, Reuters and Agence France Press had staged photos of dead bodies from the Qana airstrikes. The argument was based mainly on varying time stamps of the photographs, which the blog documented in this post.Wrote the AP:
For example, the Web site draws attention to a photo by AP's Lefteris Pitarakis time stamped 7:21 a.m., showing a dead girl in an ambulance. Another picture, stamped 10:25 a.m. and taken by AP's Mohammed Zaatari, shows the same girl being loaded onto the ambulance. In a third, by AP photographer Nasser Nasser and stamped 10:44 a.m., a rescue worker carries the girl with no ambulance nearby.

The site suggests these events were staged for effect, a criticism echoed by talk show host Rush Limbaugh when he directed listeners to the blog on Monday.
As noted in the piece, Reuters “categorically rejects” the suggestion that the photos were staged and an AFP executive was stunned it was even a question. The AP also denied that photos were staged and offered an explanation about the time stamps:
The AP said information from its photo editors showed the events were not staged, and that the time stamps could be misleading for several reasons, including that web sites can use such stamps to show when pictures are posted, not taken.
The EU Referendum has since posted it’s own response to AP’s article, with which it is none too pleased. I’ll leave it to you to ruminate on that whole argument. But it’s certainly notable that the AP commissioned a story on the matter at all – and that the two other news outlets accused responded publicly as well. After all, there are a lot of conspiracy theories out there.
Tags:
rumors ,
qana ,
associated press
Topics:
Media Issues
Add a Comment
by centralcal-2009 August 3, 2006 9:28 PM EDT
"The news agencies are not just circling the wagons, they are willfully participating in terrorist propaganda." One_American has once again succinctly hit the nail on the head. I saw Nic Robertson's CNN piece on his Hezbollah-tour-guided report on the bombing in Beirut. Some days later, I saw the same Nic Robertson (squirming this time) having to respond to Howard Kurtz's legitimate questions about airing the Hezbollah propaganda without any caveats, contradictions, or analysis. Red faced, Nic had to admit that none of the Hezbollah spokesman's claims could be investigated or validated (because he was a puppy on their short leash). I absolutely believe that this is going on in every area of the media on a regular basis and the questions about the Qana reporting is only one example of US media aiding and abetting terrorist's propaganda and, frequently, blatant lies.
Reply to this comment
by one_american August 2, 2006 10:16 PM EDT
Why no transparency in the media? Why not release the original photos to the public? The news agencies are not just circling the wagons, they are willfully participating in terrorist propaganda.
Reply to this comment
by daleyrocks August 2, 2006 9:16 PM EDT
The news agencies can feign as much shock as they deem appropriate, but they have only addressed one issue raised in the Qana incident which may or may not present problems with respect to whether the rescue operations were staged. AFP references a "digging operation", but absent one victim, the general lack of dust covering both rescuers and victims is puzzling relative to other building explosions covered by the media, as is the lack of blood on the victims. Rigor mortis has also begun to appear in many of the victims, potentially a very quick onset given the timing of the bombing. Skeptical news agencies should be evaluating these and other issues raised by EU Referendum and the blogs linked to it to aid them in determining whether what they witnessed was staged rather than just expressing shock at the suggestion. CNN correspondents have already acknowledged that media opportunities are actively managed by Hezbollah for propaganda purposes. I don't understand why people have difficulty with the possibility that this might be another opportunity based on some observations leading to unanswered questions.
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye