By

Sharyl Attkisson /

CBS/ March 1, 2010, 7:47 AM

Weatherization Stimulus Report: Fail

The promise was $5 billion in stimulus funds to weatherize homes - become more energy efficient by upgrading insulation, heating and cooling systems, air filters and windows - for 590,000 low income residents - creating jobs in all 50 states along the way.

CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports a new Inspector General's report today has the cold reality: an alarming lack of progress. Despite good intentions, bureaucratic red tape has ruled the day.

Some of the states that got the most money didn't even weatherize two percent of their target homes.

New York has $394 million available and planned to weatherize 45,400 units. But only did 280.

Believe it or not that's better than a lot of states. Cold states like Alaska ($18.1 million available) and Wyoming ($10.2 million available) didn't weatherize a single home. Same with Texas ($326 million available), Rhode Island ($20 million available), Hawaii ($4 million avail), and Washington D.C ($8 million available)

Congress' home town really could've used the help for their snowiest winter ever.

In all, only $368.2 million - less than 8 percent of the money available - has been spent on weatherization. Not surprising, the Inspector General found the jobs impact "has not materialized."

In a statement, the Energy Department (overseeing the program) said:

"We appreciate the work of the Inspector General as we continue to work with states to ramp up their programs. During January, states significantly increased their spending and the number of homes weatherized under the Recovery Act, but additional progress is needed to help states reach their targets and deliver the benefits of energy efficiency to families across the country. As a result of the Department's efforts to address challenges in the program's implementation - including resolving Davis-Bacon wage determinations in all 50 states and clarifying how states should handle historic preservation - states weatherized more than 125,000 homes by the end of 2009 and are on pace to do at least 250,000 homes this year. In fact, since September 2009, we have tripled the pace of Recovery Act-funded home weatherization.

Still, our goal is to improve further. Vice President Biden and Secretary Chu have been discussing additional steps that can be taken to continue strengthening the program, and agreed this morning to move forward with additional new measures that should increase our pace of weatherization. This will require additional reporting, the redeployment of personnel from other agencies to expand federal project oversight, and direct follow up by Secretary Chu and senior Department officials with states that are lagging behind. The Department will remain focused on providing each of the states and local agencies with the resources they need to quickly and effectively implement this program."

The single biggest expenditure in the stimulus weatherization program to date is a lump sum of $270 million. Not to weatherize homes, but given to the Department of Energy to administer the grants.
Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
  • Sharyl Attkisson On Twitter »

    Sharyl Attkisson is a CBS News investigative correspondent based in Washington. All of her stories, videos and blogs are available here.

15 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
lagunagal says:
More importantly is the man who received and disbursed this money. Where is the money John Hutchings, head of the Laborers' International Union of North America and The Working Families "rip off the middle class" Party? Now we add your name to our list and begin a forensic investigation on you Sir, personally and professionally or in the alternative submit your proof of use of tax payer proceeds in the amount of $394 million cupcake.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
elvismartinez14 says:
It has come to my attention that many people completely understand "Weatherization". I am a weatherization installer in the city of Los Angeles where thousands of people are in need of our assistants.

We don't just give things away and spend, spend, spend. We have a large list of procedures, rules and regulations that we go by. Not only that but we have a VERY strict quality assurance group of inspectors that trail our every move. We have monthly and yearly goals to meet.

Our program covers most of LA county where many people are of low-income or elderly. These are the type of people that we assist on a day-to-day basis. The ones that are unable to help themselves. We try to assist as many as possible.

"P.A.C.E" (that's the name of our organization)is a non-profit organization that will replace your refrigerator(if manufactured before 1992 and wastes tones of energy), your stove and/or your home heating unit (if it posses a health hazard to the occupants), pressurize your home (to see if it is energy efficient) and if need be seal up your house for a more energy efficient home. AND CHECK FOR CARBON MONOXIDE IN YOUR HOME. We replace windows as well, but, only if they're old louver windows (this wastes more energy).
We do many other energy saving measures depending on the condition of the house. And, we are just now getting into solar power installations.

The whole point of this is, if the budget cuts are directed this way, the ones that are going to be suffering are the less fortunate. I don't know why the other states are not using the money but they should! it would create more jobs, save lives and help the U.S be a little more green, reduce our carbon foot print.

-Elvis
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
IndepTex20 says:
"Despite good intentions, bureaucratic red tape has ruled the day."

Imagine our government bureaucracy running healthcare! LOL........another redistribution of weatlth (or attempt therein)by the Marxist in the White House!
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stormerF2 says:
Yea,to replace more energy efficent windows,and qualify for a tax credit,you have to put in the most expensive ones made. You can not get a tax credit for the next to the most expensive even though it saves energy. So you spend $1500.00 more and get a $1500.00 tax credit,you lose money on that deal,where the hell is the Math CZAR?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rockcutr says:
To actually use this weatherization money would put the oil industry in a downslide in their favorite season of winter. Our lovely repube gov in tejas refuses to use fed funds. He don't care about the citizens as much as snubbing the democratic offerings for a much needed break from winter heating bills. Folks, we, as usual, are on our own. Our leaders have abandond us.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
gboyd41 says:
This is the same govt. who wants/demands to run our health care? God help us all.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sjc_1 says:
This sounds like the states used it for other purposes. Put Americorp directly in charge of the project and cut out the governors that loot the funding.
reply
tweetyyyy replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
hello
stormerF2 replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Governors,hell the mayors will steal the fund blind.Just look at Sacramento,Ca. the mayor had Americorp workers cleaning his car and cutting his grass for free.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
stevador39 says:
President B.O. can issue an executive order and Haiti gets immediate care and billions of dollars that will never be accounted for. However, Americans who pay the taxes are one health care event away from catastrophic medical bills. IMPEACH B.O.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
prohb says:
Read my post about the lack of federal oversight on Toyota. We do not have the staff infrastructure in these departments to do a quicker, efficient job. The Bush administration eviserated these departments and sent staff/money to the Defense Department. That's why we are having other problems with the stimulus (lack of oversight staff led to a few ficticious counties being reported), regulation oversight...as in Toyota, and in this case getting the weatherizaton going. The problem is not government but enough good government for oversight, regulation and coordination of the money. Sometimes, people, you have to spend money in order to make or save money.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
nobama_noway says:
just more failure from Obama

What is new

saw an article that said that it was over 50K spent for each house completed.... what a waste
reply
See all 15 Comments