Last Updated Oct 7, 2009 2:29 PM EDT
... paid search ads by pharmaceutical companies dropped a whopping 84% between March 26 of this year and the end of June.March 26 was the date the FDA sent warning letters regarding 48 online drug ads that it cited as misleading. Each of the ads was one of those little, single-line-of-text ads that pops up next to real results when you search in Google. Bayer's ad for Levitra said merely:
Poor Blood Flow & ED; Blood Flow May Decrease With High Blood Pressure And May Lead to EDRather than come up with an innovative way around the FDA's position, most companies bailed on the category, Comscore said:
ComScore said sponsored link exposures (paid search) to U.S. web users dropped 59% in the first week alone after the warning letters were issued, from 10.5 million paid search ads to 4.3 million between March 29 and April 5,The result was that searching for information about drugs on the internet actually became harder, according to John Mangano, a vp at ComScore:
"Here's a perfect example," Mr. Mangano said. "When the swine flu was at its peak in the spring, if you searched for 'swine flu' there were a lot of pharma brands that didn't come up â€" but Clorox did. Go figure."That news will probably be used to bash the FDA at its upcoming hearings into pharma marketers' use of web 2.0 and social media. Drug companies' entire case in favor of increased rights to advertise on the web is that they're merely educating consumers about health issues.
- FDA's Web 2.0 Hearing Recalls Its Unintentionally Hilarious Panel From 1996: "What Is the Internet?"
- FDA to Hold Hearing on Social Media, Web 2.0; Long Overdue Guidance Could Be On Its Way
- 14 Drug Companies Cited for Misleading Google Ads
- Pfizer Plans 100-Strong Twitter Army to Fight "Bad Rap"; Imposter Poses a Problem
- A Q&A With J&J's Joe Natale on Why Pharma Stays Stuck in the Web's Past
- FTC Considers Extending Ad Jurisdiction to Blogs and Bloggers