Political Hotsheet
November 10, 2009 2:48 PM

Liberal Base "Worried" About Obama Agenda

(AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)
Jane Hamsher, the founder of liberal blog FireDogLake.com, said in an interview Tuesday that the liberal base is "worried" about the Obama administration and may "stay home" in the 2010 midterm elections.

Hamsher compared the current situation to the 1994 elections, when, she said, the Democratic base (including union members) was demoralized and disengaged following the passage of The North American Free Trade Agreement. Republicans took control of both the House and Senate in that contest.

She argued that the Obama administration is paying little attention to its base even as the opposition gins up support among the Republican base with events like the Tea Party protests.

"If you're suppressing your base, and the other side is revving up theirs, and midterm elections are all about turning out the base, I sort of question what their strategy is here," she said.

Hamsher has signed on to a financial boycott of the Democratic National Committee, Organizing for America (the DNC-run operation to mobilize Obama supporters) and the Obama campaign. The boycott was organized by Americablog's John Aravosis and Joe Sudbay over what they see as President Obama and his party's failure to keep its commitments to the gay and lesbian community.

"LGBT Americans, our families, and our friends kept our promise at the ballot box, we now expect President Obama to keep his in the White House," they wrote. In addition to Hamsher, cosponsors include the liberal blog Daily Kos, writer and editor Dan Savage and radio host Michelangelo Signorile.

The boycott will be lifted, Aravosis and Sudbay write, when legislation is signed enacting the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, repealing Don't Ask, Don't Tell and repealing the Defense of Marriage Act. During the presidential campaign, Mr. Obama pledged action on all these issues but has not pressed them since entering office.

"We respect the right of anyone to express their views and always are willing to listen," a DNC official told Hotsheet in response to the boycott. "And, we recognize that there is much more to do. We do, however, take pride in the historic accomplishments which we have been able to achieve with the help of the community just nine months into the president's term and are we going to continue to work for greater equality and justice for all Americans."

Accomplishments cited by the official included signing into law an extension of hate crimes protections for LGBT citizens, extending benefits for same-sex partners of federal employees, hiring record numbers of LGBT Americans, and extending the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Extension Act.

That's not enough for some on the left, however – and LGBT issues are not the only ones generating anger. Separate from the Americablog effort, another boycott is being organized by Markos Moulitsas of Daily Kos. He is calling on his readers not to donate to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee because it is supporting candidates who voted against the health care reform bill. "Instead, give to those elected officials who best reflect your values," he writes.

In addition to signing onto the Americablog boycott, Hamsher pushed her readers to unsubscribe to the Organizing for America mailing list, which is believed to include 12 - 13 million names. Liberals have been unhappy with OFA for not doing more on progressive causes like the gay marriage referendum in Maine.

"They don't want to go out on issues that would make supporters of that list happy," said Hamsher. "They're triangulating against that list."

The DNC official counters that the president remains popular with liberals (and "across the political spectrum") and notes that Democrats have won all five special elections this year – evidence, the official suggested, that the base is not demoralized.
Tags:
Jane Hamsher ,
glbt ,
gay ,
Democratic National Committee ,
Obama
Topics:
Gay Issues
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 52 Comments
by wheresclair November 11, 2009 3:38 PM EST
People need to understand that when they elect a candidate, it is a long term investment. The newly elected official has to work within the framework of what he or she can legally do unilaterally or in concert with peers and the order and timing of what they try to accomplish depends hugely on those peers, the current national climate, and the vocal support of their base. When the base gets impatient and questions their candidate's commitment to their cause, the opposition jumps in and becomes empowered. For example, in the case of Barack Obama and the issue of "Gay Rights," there is no question that he is committed to equal rights for Gays and Lesbians. The question is HOW to make it happen. Obama is very intelligent and understands politics and timing very well. He knows he has to have several strong and widely popular political successes before he can insert something like Gay Rights on to the public stage. Give him the time and the support to get into that position of advantage. Quit nit-picking and whining. You voted for him, trust him. If you splinter the party now, the opposition WILL make large gains in 2010 and then your cause will be lost ? possibly for decades. You CAN oppose Obama like a 12 year old not getting their way, or you can see the big picture that you are falling right into the hands of the opposition that's just waiting for opportunities to split the party. If the party splits, they win every time! If they win, it will be the fault of those too immature to give him some time. Another example is this abortion issue. If liberals bail or threaten to bail on the health bill, it's gone...possibly forever. Instead, they need to get in there and just make sure the language stays the same so neither side gains the advantage. Grow up people; don't throw it all away on ?principle,? because the alternative is soooo much worse. If you fail to support the Democratic Party or fail to vote ?on principle? you?ll see what it?ll get you?it will get you the opposite of what you want! Don't fall into the opposition's hands! Yeah, you?ll be sending the world a message all right?you?ll be looking pretty dumb to have defeated yourselves!
Reply to this comment
by jdblue82 November 11, 2009 10:01 PM EST
Clair our cause is just as lost if Obama fails to act. He's demonstrated via inaction on several issues that LGBT equality is not on the top of his list. My civil rights, while they might not be a priority to him, are a priority to me.

Yet this President, nine months into his term, has failed to push for the repeal of DADT, the passage of employment and housing non-discrimination law, and has missed yet another opportunity (Maine) to speak out against discriminatory ballot propositions.

Other than hate crimes legislation, which has taken the Democrats over a decade to pass, there has been no significant support of LGBT Americans by the political party that claims to best represent them. Well, we've given and given, and gotten nothing in return. Why on Earth should we funnel money into the DNC or a pathetic excuse for "fierce" advocacy from the White House, President Obama's OFA? It's not like the Republicans did any worse for us over the last decade. Maybe another few years of them in Congress and the DNC will start keeping its promises.
by bacaangel November 11, 2009 9:52 AM EST
That is what the GOP want -- a divided base! Democrats must not be "hoodwinked and fooled" into an abortion fight that does not really exist! We should be smarter than that... We must keep our "eye" on the Prize -- Goal of healthcare for all Americans and lower premiums for those who are already insured. Democrats have a chance to lead by actually doing something good for Americans -- like health care, which is tied to the deficit and the bankrupting of businesses and families. We must keep our "eye" on the Prize and not be labeled with the title of another "do nothing Congress"!

GOP politicians and operatives continue to dishonestly and deceptively say that they cannot support a public option, they claim that they want to keep costs down for the American people! Really? This they claim all the while knowing that a public option/competition is the only way to really control cost and to bring about true reform thereby putting a definite Halt to the ?out of control? medical costs and premiums crippling people and businesses today, making it harder and harder for average Americans and young people to realize and take advantage of the slowly, slipping away American Dream. One could ask themselves, If you happen to lose your job today or tomorrow in these unstable economic times and at a time when we currently do not have healthcare reform for all, who would pay you or your familiy's health care costs, that is, if you are lucky enough to be able to see a doctor without insurance? This American Dream, now being called Socialism by the GOP has slowly been slipping away, and is in the last throes of dying, if we do not forge a new path onwards toward inclusion and cooperation for all. This dream of America will die to be replaced with just another third world country -- only to go by the wayside and into the history books as another failed experiment.
Reply to this comment
by wdh3007 November 10, 2009 11:59 PM EST
Now even the liberals and democratic voters who once suppported the change are just now starting to see how poorly organized, misrepresented, unqualified and out of touch this administration really is. I hope every single millitary person and civilian votes in 2010 because today if an election was held even old man Mcain would win!
Reply to this comment
by tonyatq November 11, 2009 2:25 AM EST
Get real McCain will never will even today.
by askagain November 10, 2009 10:37 PM EST
The liberal base needs to understand that President Obama must be president for all Americans. This sometimes means compromising. Otherwise, little or nothing is apt to get accomplished. Further, every President needs the support of independent voters who are results oriented rather than dedicated to a political party. The independent voters swing back and forth depending on what they like or dislike. These are political realities.
Reply to this comment
by CD_R2 November 10, 2009 10:34 PM EST
Obama is a fraud and a failure. Lots of people have known this for a while now. Glad to see the Democrats have figured it out too.
Reply to this comment
by environmental_wacko November 10, 2009 11:41 PM EST
You're projecting.
by kevjustice November 10, 2009 10:04 PM EST
Obama is currently doing what is politically smart. Also, if a public option is dropped it may be a good move for the Dems. This is because if premiums continue to go up the Dems can say " I told you so, you should have had a public option". Otherwise, if there is a public option that passes they can also claim victory(or even a bill that passes without a public option). In short, they win either way.
Reply to this comment
by bubbadubba November 10, 2009 9:57 PM EST
Never heard of her or her stupid blog.
Who cares?
Reply to this comment
by sonofsummarex November 10, 2009 9:32 PM EST
I hope they continue to be concerned.

By not allowing himself to be dragged into their ultra left wing causes, Obama has been able to stay on the side of the people and govern effectively. I would rather have this, than homosexual marriages, drug legalization, more abortions and a failed president.
Reply to this comment
by jumkey November 10, 2009 10:46 PM EST
What, the last failed President wasn't enough for you?
by tonyatq November 11, 2009 2:28 AM EST
You are right! The president must be a president for all. I don' t necessary agree with everything he does but I am willing to compromise.
by FauxNews November 10, 2009 9:29 PM EST
Now that Obama has deployed 40,000 more troops to the Middle East, the liberals will no longer have to "worry" about Obama, they can down right "know" he doesn't represent them.
Reply to this comment
by bluedenmant November 10, 2009 11:44 PM EST
got your crystal ball out again, I see...
by brian1920 November 10, 2009 9:10 PM EST
The typical argument for ObamaCare is that it will offer better medical care for everyone and cost less to do it, but occasionally a supporter lets the mask slip and reveals the real political motivation. So let's give credit to John Cassidy, part of the left-wing stable at the New Yorker, who wrote last week on its Web site that "it's important to be clear about what the reform amounts to."

Mr. Cassidy is more honest than the politicians whose dishonesty he supports. "The U.S. government is making a costly and open-ended commitment," he writes. "Let's not pretend that it isn't a big deal, or that it will be self-financing, or that it will work out exactly as planned. It won't. What is really unfolding, I suspect, is the scenario that many conservatives feared. The Obama Administration . . . is creating a new entitlement program, which, once established, will be virtually impossible to rescind."

Why are they doing it? Because, according to Mr. Cassidy, ObamaCare serves the twin goals of "making the United States a more equitable country" and furthering the Democrats' "political calculus." In other words, the purpose is to further redistribute income by putting health care further under government control, and in the process making the middle class more dependent on government. As the party of government, Democrats will benefit over the long run.
Reply to this comment
See all 52 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Tempers Flare In Climate Change Flap

    (703 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER