Political Hotsheet
July 9, 2009 11:50 AM

Pelosi Shoots Down Resolution Honoring Jackson

(AP )
Two days ago, Texas Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee stood onstage at the Michael Jackson memorial service and said she would introduce a resolution in the House of Representatives honoring Jackson as a "global humanitarian."

The idea prompted concern from House Democrats, thanks in part to the King Of Pop's mixed legacy – one that encompassed both revolutionary music and repeated legal troubles. One Republican member of the House, Peter King, complained about the tributes to Jackson, deeming him a "pervert." As Politico reported, Rep. John Yarmuth, a Kentucky Democrat, walked out of the House chamber when the Congressional Black Caucus called for a moment of silence for Jackson, saying the reaction to Jackson's death had left him "nauseated."

Now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has stated that she does not support Jackson-Lee's effort. In a press conference Thursday morning, Pelosi said she doesn't "think it's necessary for us to have a resolution."

"What I have said to my colleagues over the years, and certainly as leader and as speaker, is that there's an opportunity on the floor of the House to express their sympathy or their praise any time that they wish," she said.

Pressed on why she opposed the resolution, Pelosi reiterated that House members could praise Jackson's life and work without a resolution.

"A resolution, I think, would open up to contrary views to -- that are not necessary at this time to be expressed in association with a resolution whose purpose is quite different," she said.

Complete coverage of Jackson's death
Tags:
Michael Jackson ,
Sheila Jackson-Lee ,
Nancy Pelosi ,
Resolution
Topics:
In The News
Add a Comment See all 49 Comments
by trapbreaking July 9, 2009 9:51 PM EDT
Bury the poor bstard and go on with your lives. MJ, Hendrix, Morrison, Joplin, and all the rest of the doper celibs that did themselves in with drugs are not the idols I want my children looking up to.
Reply to this comment
by Jewiss_Woman July 9, 2009 5:39 PM EDT
lollll whats pathetic about all your hate is that MJ's name will be remembered long after this speaker and generations of other speakers have come and gone.... MJ's status is that of a god... parlaying amongst parasitic insects... his name means more to 4 billion than any president present or past probabely does... lollll take ur fight to the world and try to convince them they're wrong about idolozing him
Reply to this comment
by whatsup49 July 9, 2009 5:30 PM EDT
thank you speaker pelosi. you've made one good decision so far.
Reply to this comment
by Jewiss_Woman July 9, 2009 5:28 PM EDT
WOWWWWW it's simply fascinating how the sheep are fed any amount without applying their own sense of discernment. So the news is out that the now 14 YEAR OLD BOY THAT ACCUSED JACKSON OF MOLESTATION.... WAS "SUPPOSEDLY FORCED TO SAY THIS BY HIS MONEY HUNGRY CUNNIVING DAWG OF A FATHER" and of course... to the neo nazi population (oh which are oh so on the rise around the country.... especially on the internet) its the perfect opportunity to strike and to further villify MJ... even though he was found innocent in a court of law... no this never matter becos their real motives were about his race.... hmmmm the same notion of difference they used in their total decimation of the Aboriginal populations of North America. Any sin that MJ committed... pales in comparison to what their grave digging and land robbing ancestors have committed against humanity. Sheila Jackson's determination to commemorate MJ was the right thing to do given that MICHAEL JACKSON HAS MORE PEOPLE CHANTING HIS NAME ACROSS THE GLOBE.... THAN THE ENTIRE POPULATION OF NORTH AMERICA COMBINED!!! Furthermore if the Bushes.... international nazi terrorists (whose history date back to Adolph Hitlers campaign against the jews)well if these can have their names emblazoned as if they were heroes, then so does MJ atleast according to the people of the world. The fact of the matter is... that whatever he became,, the blame can only be laid at the feet of a culture that lauds eurocentric values and overlooks the dynamic of the worlds other wonderful cultures. MJ wanted to look white becos the culture script implies that this is the image to have. I suggest you all back the fkk off of the man and go worry ABOUT ur ancestors sins against humanity.... START FIRST WITH PUTTING THE FACE OF AN ABORIGINAL NATIVE ON THE GREEN DOLLAR BILL... AS NORTH AMERICA IS AND ALWAYS WILL REMAIN THE RED MAN'S LAND... IRREGARDLESS OF THE 400 YEARS OF COLONISATION!!!
Reply to this comment
by sbelknap01 July 9, 2009 5:17 PM EDT
Michael's friends, family and fans don't need a resolution to recognize his value and Nancy knows that such an attempt will allow lunatic, hateful politicians an opportunity to spend hours and hours and hours speaking ill of the dead - something his friends, family and fans don't need either. Yet the headlines all make it sound like Nancy hated Jacko, while reading the details makes it clear that she is doing her job - keeping the politicians on topic and off the 'we hate odd people' bandwagon. She's right.
Reply to this comment
by jack20083 July 9, 2009 5:08 PM EDT
Racism is still alive and well in America. Shame on you. You aren't hiding behind white sheets but you are hiding behind and writing your crap over the internet in blogs. This is why this country isn't going to move forward. No matter what good anybody will try, you keep falling back to your hate. Is hate is all that you know? You are still afraid of a black person or a black family suceeding in this country. He tried his best to fit into your white world of acceptance but it was never good enough. Oh, Bill O'Riley, we loved him no matter what. The only way for this hate to die off is to wait for the rest of you to pass on. Hopefully, just hopefully the world can move forward without being reminded of your hate and mean spirit deeds. This is the classic BS that was done in the 20 - 70's in this country. Later years, your tried to mass the hate but it still always came out in your behavior. Let your hate go, you will feel better.
Reply to this comment
by BM454 July 10, 2009 7:27 PM EDT
Right on,Camacho for Pres 2112!
by credibility2 July 9, 2009 4:50 PM EDT
Isn't wanting to honor Jackson in this way like scraping the bottom of the barrel? Are there no other black Americans more deserving of this type of honor? This type of pandering is a joke. MJ is being made out to be more than he actually was as a desperate effort to try and cover up the fact that he was immoral and a drug addict who wouldn't get help for either affliction. Big deal! MJ sold lots of records and made empty puny lives of his fans have some semblance of meaning and reason to exist.
Reply to this comment
by trapbreaking July 9, 2009 4:45 PM EDT
A pedophile and a doper. Why give this jerk a resolution? What they want to add Michael to the list of famous white women in America? Nancy is right for once.
Reply to this comment
by pw08-2009 July 9, 2009 4:02 PM EDT
I don't know why we would need this kind of resolution because we will be hearing about Michael Jackson, continuously in the foreseeable future and Sheila Jackson-lee, like so many others...used this opportunity to get her face on Television in front of a big crowd and that was her main intention, I'm sure.
Reply to this comment
by sandog1960 July 9, 2009 4:05 PM EDT
What was she doing at the ceremony anyway? Doesn't she have a day job?
by chesteena July 9, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
Just give it a rest........ and MJ, too.
Reply to this comment
by stickdog3 July 9, 2009 3:44 PM EDT
Sorry can't do that these neo-Nazis started it with their new poster girl Pelosi. So this is gonna go on until we say its done, and thats when these clowns wake up and realize the real.
by sandog1960 July 9, 2009 4:01 PM EDT
With the country spiraling downward as it is, the jackasses or the elephants shouldn't even be considering this ridiculous nonsense.
by far_point200 July 9, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
"Pelosi Shoots Down Resolution Honoring Jackson".... WHAT? A democrap doing the right and descent thing. Ok, what's the catch?
Reply to this comment
by stillwaters6 July 9, 2009 3:31 PM EDT
Now THE BEATLES borrowed from the Isley Brothers and never paid them for thier work...SHAKE IT UP BABY...

Oh and before Ludwig Von Beethoven came along Classical music was in the pits...
Reply to this comment
by stillwaters6 July 9, 2009 3:27 PM EDT
HOLD UP...

ELVIS MARRIED AND SEX_ED PRISCILLA WHEN SHE WAS ONLY 14!

THE BEATLES HAD UNLIMITED WESTERN APPEAL YET LIMITED GLOBAL APPEAL AND THEY STOLE MUCH OF THEIR MUSIC FROM THE ISLEY BROTHERS!

If you're gonna dig one ditch you'd better dig two!
Reply to this comment
by stillwaters6 July 9, 2009 3:26 PM EDT
HOLD UP...

ELVIS MARRIED AND SEX_ED PRISCILLA WHEN SHE WAS ONLY 14!

THE BEATLES HAD UNLIMITED WESTERN APPEAL YET LIMITED GLOBAL APPEAL AND THEY STOLE MUCH OF THEIR MUSIC FROM THE ISLEY BROTHERS!

If you're gonna dig one ditch you'd better dig two!
Reply to this comment
by stickdog3 July 9, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
Thank you stillwaters6 - They often conveniently forget he married that girl when she was 14. And you're right The Beatles themselves admitted taking the Isley Brothers music, and Chuck Berrys. And you're right again. in that they had western appeal but limited global appeal at that time. Thats why Michael bought they catalog, and will be making money off of it for years and years to come, payback is a mother isn't it. Good post 'bro
by sandog1960 July 9, 2009 3:06 PM EDT
I'm curious as to how many of you haters out there have your own slimy little secrets lurking in your closets.......
Reply to this comment
by stickdog3 July 9, 2009 3:21 PM EDT
Well said 'bro.
by jeffstersf July 9, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
Charlie: Get a life
Reply to this comment
by jeffstersf July 9, 2009 2:59 PM EDT
I often agree with Nancy. Including now. You folks think she is a dogmatic lefty. Not true. She is PRAGMATIC, and I salute her for this move.
Reply to this comment
by rushlimpdrug July 9, 2009 2:25 PM EDT
Wow.

Nancy Polussy is a total wimp.

She is unbelievably stupid.

Did she ever get her CIA troubling remarks corrected?
Reply to this comment
by toldyouso29 July 9, 2009 2:21 PM EDT
Pelosi was right to shoot this down. Even if MJ was not a controversial figure with a mysterious and perhaps sickening history; it still would not have been appropriate. To be honest--it never was appropriate for Congress to switch from their job as legislatures to PR promoters or historical revisionists. We are at war with two countries. We have, in short order alienated Russia and China who has ties to North Korea. We have, in short order indulged in activities that threaten the world both economically, physically and environmentally. We have a money and health crisis as well as a health insurance crisis.

We do not, in the middle of such challenges need to introduce any resolution or award or praise just to make certain groups feel good or to honor 1 person. Priorities. This is not the time or the place and Congress needs to get out of the business of trying to make personal agendas become our country's agenda. No person, no matter how well loved or famous or notorious should EVER be the focus of the entire country's government unless that person was an integral and critical part of that government and their death reflects that void and necessity for changed government policies.

No race should push for resolutions or promises that assuage their grief or demand others turn a blind eye to heinous accusations and information.

And for everyone who turned out for the funereal, who have spent the past few weeks crying and sighing and denying (nod to Jesse and his rhyming) : where were YOU before MJ died? Were you continuing to support him or go to his concerts? Could he count on YOUR money to help pay his legal bills as you bought CDs and magazines with him interviewed? Did you laugh at the jokes about him being a possible pedophile or homosexual? Did you tell or repeat the jokes?

The hypocrisy has to stop. From all the people (of every race) who did not care about MJ until he was gone and now --Niagra Falls--to Politicians who seek to honor him when he can no longer see it to the Politician who DARES to indict him on charges of sexual behavior when a court did not and who DARES (as that party does) to pass judgment and speak about a private citizen as if he is fodder for government or legislation.

Congress keeps forgetting their job. Jackson-Lee forgot hers in trying to elevate a private citizen when we have far more pressing business. King and others forgot theirs when they dared to reflect or discuss or proclaim MJ a "pervert" or pedophile. None of these people are performing in any capacity their elected jobs as legislatures. There are no laws concerning MJ on the floor--the type of remarks whether pro or con are more suited for the bar or club scene AFTER work is done, rather than as remarks any elected official should be making as a part of legal business.

On another note--take a look at the people who called Jackson a pervert and a pedophile. Look real closely. Some people have not learned their lessons yet. The bible says "Judge not, lest ye also be judged" The people yelping the loudest are suspect. They are too proud and self righteous and as everyone knows with Craig, Vitter, Spitzer, Foley, Ensign and Sanford, Gingrich and Guiliani--God LOVES to knock the legs out from under self righteous and haughty folk.

don't be surprised if, at some point the very people who criticized MJ are found to be doing similar things or being accused of it--like Sanford and his self righteous cloak about Clinton--then being discovered with his own adultery--what comes around goes around.

Some people just never, ever seem to learn that--no matter how many times God rubs their faces or their party's face in it.
Reply to this comment
by stickdog3 July 9, 2009 3:19 PM EDT
Very poignant piece. Seems you're tuned into life and the World. Or, are you? I fundamentally disagree with your assertion that Pelosi was right in her indignation. I say she was dead wrong. Your assertion that this type of thing (resolutions should be for people intertwined with government, is not a very noble suggestion. Actually Michael, visited quite a few Military hospitals Worldwide. Lots of times. Unfortunately the camers were never there. If you look up resolutions drawn up by Congress, you will see quite a few private citizens, that were awarded them. No, this isn't about Michael being a controversial figure (who isn't)? This if way beyond that. Way beyond that. We've had U.S. Presidents that make Michael look like a choir boy. We got one President on Mt. Rushmore right now who once said the "only good Indian is a dead Indian". Now put that in your peace pipe and smoke it.
by sandog1960 July 9, 2009 2:14 PM EDT
Have our leaders lost their collective minds? I believe there are much bigger fish to fry than wasting time on humanitarian resolutions - solve the economy!!
Reply to this comment
See all 49 Comments

60 Minutes

The secrets of tennis legend Andre Agassi; the growing threat of cyber wars; and more.
Read More

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER