Political Hotsheet
June 29, 2009 2:14 PM

Obama Touts New Light Bulb Standards

(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
President Obama on Monday announced new federal efforts to promote energy efficiency in the United States, through stricter standards on fluorescent and incandescent light and other measures.

"I know light bulbs might not seem sexy," Mr. Obama said, "but this simple action holds enormous promise because 7 percent of all energy consumed in America is used to light our homes and our businesses."

He framed the efforts as part of his goal to reduce the nation's dependence on foreign oil through a variety of means, including through the cap and trade legislation that passed in the House on Friday.

"When we put aside the posturing and politics... a simple choice emerges," Mr. Obama said. "We can remain the world's leading importer of oil, or we can become the world's leading exporter of clean energy. That's our choice: Between a slow decline and renewed prosperity. Between the past and the future."

The president said the new look at light bulbs is starting at the White House.

"Secretary Chu is already taking a look at our light bulbs," he said.

Energy Secretary Steve Chu will also expand and accelerate the deployment of energy efficient technologies in new buildings, something that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act began, the president said.

He pointed to the state of California as an example of what stricter energy efficiency standards could achieve. In the late 1970's, California enacted tougher energy policies, which the president said, helped create millions of jobs. Today, he said, Californians consume 40 percent less energy per person than the national average.

"One of the fastsest, easiest and cheapest ways to make our economy stronger and cleaner is to make our economy more energy efficient," he said.

The American people, Mr. Obama said, "expect us to move forward right now" to create a clean energy economy.

To that end, the president praised the House for passing the climate change measure, which he said "will finally open the door to decreasing our dependence on foreign oil," and he added, "create new business, new industries and millions of new jobs... all without placing untenable burdens on the American people or business."

Mr. Obama said he is confident the Senate will also "choose to move this country forward."
Tags:
energy ,
Barack Obama ,
Steven Chu ,
light bulbs
Topics:
Energy
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by darcylars August 12, 2009 4:49 AM EDT
Obama has announced changing of Fluorescent light bulbs to energy saving bulbs in united states.This action is been taken all over the world.Obama puts his efforts as part of his goal to reduce nation dependence on other foreign countries and, Obama has specified that the new look at light bulbs will start from white house.

Regards,
darcylars
http://www.lyco.co.uk/
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 June 30, 2009 4:30 PM EDT
"to" should be "too".
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 June 30, 2009 4:29 PM EDT
by June 30, 2009 1:00 PM PDT
Freedom of choice will be the correct way to let the country handle change.


Left to freedom of choice, there will be no change. People are just to lazy.
Reply to this comment
by June 30, 2009 4:00 PM EDT
Use dimmers to save electricity. By the time flourecents are made to produce the same luminance an incandecent bulb does it will be years. A dimmer gives you the option right away to light the pathways in your house dimmmed and put light at it's brightest where you want it. No regulation or house energy eficiency inspections are needed to sell a home. If you want brightness you have it by adding a dimmer. At the same time you can dim it if you want to 'Save The Planet'. Take your dimmers with you to your next house if you want.

I am all for efficiency and hate to waste. To regulate that I have use a flourecent instead of a dimmer is rediculous. Our government (USA) needs back off and let people come to there own conclusions. First they want to see slow change so that people don't loose there jobs to fast due to rapid technology changes. Then they want to push it with flourecent mercury light bulbs. Freedom of choice will be the correct way to let the country handle change.
Reply to this comment
by June 30, 2009 3:26 PM EDT
There is a very real danger of filling our landfills with flourecent light bulbs that contain mercury (which all do). If our whole country is forced to use them we will also have dispose of them properly which will be something else the government will regulate after they have stupidly passed the bills that creates a mess. And who will enforce it. Government paid employees. The 'Flourecent Light Bulb Police'. Why they don't mention the mercury danger is beyond me.
Reply to this comment
by erasmus111 June 30, 2009 3:51 PM EDT
Before these bulbs were even made, they should have had something set up for disposing of them. Here, in British Columbia, we are supposed to double bag them in ziplock bags and take them to HomeDepot. They have a container there for disposing them. I think there are other places to, but I just wonder how many people are even doing it? In fact, I wonder how many people even know what they are supposed to do. A lot of people don't even read what's on the package. And all that is stated on the package is that it contains mercury, and it's in very small print.

For instance, I wonder how many people know that if one of these bulbs should break, that you are supposed to leave the house for 10 minutes because of the mercury fumes? Or if when they clean it up, you are supposed to wear gloves and you are supposed to use cardboard or whatever to sweep it up. What ever you use also needs to be disposed of properly too.
by erasmus111 June 30, 2009 1:21 PM EDT
by zonkzilla June 30, 2009 4:24 AM PDT
Those spiral lights stink. I use them, but their light is poor, the color is bad, and they are dim.



I don't find that they are dim, but they are BAD. No one should be using the "spiral" CFL bulbs. They give off VERY dirty electricity. People have been getting sick from them. If you have them, do NOT sit near them. The ones you should be getting are the "closed" CFL bulbs. They look like the incandescent bulbs only shaped slightly different.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 June 30, 2009 11:02 AM EDT
fire good, uggg...
Reply to this comment
by dg441-2009 June 30, 2009 9:07 AM EDT
Is he going to hire a "light bulb czar" to make sure everyone is using them?
Reply to this comment
by kaylag04 June 30, 2009 8:47 AM EDT
"I have an idea, why don't all you neocons form your own country somewhere like Antarctica and be "free" to freeze in the "correct" light of tallow candles."-by Slrman

Some places up here ARE like Antarctica 6 months a year, and the spiral fuorescent bulbs just plain don't work in the cold. If they work for Brazil, you should have the CHOICE to select them for your lighting needs.
Reply to this comment
by bronco602 June 30, 2009 8:30 AM EDT
One thing I haven't seen on here is that these bulbs contain high amounts of mercury. You can't just toss them in the garbage.
Reply to this comment
by Slrman June 30, 2009 7:44 AM EDT
All of you people moaning and whining about using fluorescent lights are simply uninformed fools. Here in Brazil, over 90% of all residential lighting is the florescent bulbs. They last longer, are cheaper to use and produce a good light for the energy used. Yes, it's a little different than incandescent bulbs, which were different from candles and lanterns. I'm sure there were Luddites like you that complained about that, too.

I have an idea, why don't all you neocons form your own country somewhere like Antarctica and be "free" to freeze in the "correct" light of tallow candles.
Reply to this comment
by johninpennsyl June 30, 2009 7:34 AM EDT
Those lightbulbs really helped California a lot!
Reply to this comment
by zonkzilla June 30, 2009 7:28 AM EDT
"A lot of countries are already doing this, it's a good idea.

America is a leader not a follower, whether other countries are doing something or does not affect my opinion on something. It is not a good idea. The good idea is LED lights that look like a regular light bulb. The LED light is bright, will not shatter and break, and does not contain hazardous materials. But then again other countries are not using them so we should not use them, right?
Reply to this comment
by zonkzilla June 30, 2009 7:24 AM EDT
Those spiral lights stink.
I use them, but their light is poor, the color is bad, and they are dim.
I agree with others, the solution is not garbage products in our homes it is more nuclear power plants.
What most people don't know is that the oil and coal companies funded the demise of nuclear power plants in the US including large donations to environmental groups who fought against nuclear power.
The fear was that nuclear power would take the place of natural gas and electric cars would replace gasoline cars.
Looks like their plan worked great and it was money well spent.
Reply to this comment
by govwatch2 June 29, 2009 11:11 PM EDT
What rock has BO been sleeping under? Energy efficient lights have been out for ten years. How about clean cost effective nuclear power?
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 June 30, 2009 11:22 AM EDT
Nuclear Power either fission or fusion, maybe even cold fusion along with renewable or inexhaustible sources are all part of the many pieces of the future (is now) electrical generation.

CFL light bulbs are the beginning or first steps in reducing the consumption (and cost) on the load side. Usage and Demand must continue to be reduced, possibly to the point that 75% of household consumption could be low 12 volt current drawn from a battery source.


Reducing the load side of the equation and incorporating a battery storage system would greatly contribute to the relief of the open valve generation equation.
by govwatch2 June 29, 2009 11:08 PM EDT
What rock has BO been sleeping under? Energy efficient lights have been out for ten years. How about clean cost effective nuclear power?
Reply to this comment
by kaylag04 June 29, 2009 10:01 PM EDT
Turn one of these miracle light-bulbs on in the garage or on the porch during winter in the rockies. You might trip and break your neck during the 45 minutes or so it takes for the bulb to illuminate anything, but you'll be saving the planet!! Of course, day-long joyrides in Air Force One use enough energy to equal lighting all my incandescent bulbs for about a century - so maybe there are more convienient ways to save the planet...
Reply to this comment
by CarolJWright June 29, 2009 9:40 PM EDT
The damned spiral lightbulbs burn out very quickly, thus defeating any energy savings probably. How much energy does it take to produce, market, and ship each bulb. Maybe someone has done the carbon footprint math on this, manufacturing crappy lightbulbs. Who is in charge of quality control? Can some Chinese factory managers be tried and jailed? I keep hearing that if each of us replaced ONE bulb in our house, that it would make a big difference in overall use of electricity. Sure, perhaps...but not with what is available in REALITY.
Reply to this comment
by South-of-Heaven June 29, 2009 9:39 PM EDT
Our rights are being trampled by energy Efficient light bulbs.
we cant have that......
Reply to this comment
by Slrman June 29, 2009 9:36 PM EDT
USA Constitution - you are so full of it and a really stupid individual at that. YOu are a person that is so arrogant in their stupidity that you cannot see any good in anything that you can't think of yourself.

Here in Brazil, almost all lighting in the home is florescent bulbs. All it does is save us money on,out electric bill. No laws about this were required, just people smarter than you. No law forcing you to use them is contemplated for the USA, either, you are just so reactionary that you cannot see facts when they are gnawing on your posterior.

Wake up and look at the reality. The USA has to take a stand on this or be left in the trash bin of history. But you'd rather see than than admit you are wrong about anything.
Reply to this comment
See all 33 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER