Political Hotsheet
May 26, 2009 2:29 PM

From 40 To 9 To 1: The Selection Of Sonia Sotomayor

(AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
It was at 8 o'clock last evening, at the end of a day that included four hours of golf, that President Obama finalized his decision: he would nominate Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court.

He picked up the phone and called the federal appeals court judge to tell her the news. He also called the other three finalists on his short list: Solicitor-General nominee Elena Kagan, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and U.S. Circuit Court Judge Diane Wood.

Briefing reporters on the selection process, senior administration officials say President Obama could have comfortably nominated any one of the four finalists.

"They were all stellar candidates," said the officials. And the runners up always have the next vacancy on the high court to aim for.

President Obama met personally last week with each of the final four. He spent an hour in the Oval Office last Thursday with Sotomayor. That was the day the news media was otherwise occupied with the dueling Gitmo speeches by Mr. Obama and former Vice President Cheney.

In fact, officials say Sotomayor spent seven hours at the White House that day being vetted on her record, her taxes, and her life story.

"I don't think there's been any stone left unturned," said one senior official about the thoroughness of the background check.

Her taxes? No problem, they said. Her diabetes? "We feel she's in good health and will serve for many years to come," said an official.

They called it a "very rigorous process," but on some issues, the examiners steered clear. They didn't ask her about the controversial case in which she ruled against some white New Haven firefighters who claimed reverse discrimination. The matter is on appeal to the Supreme Court and may come back before her.

And on the issue of abortion, the officials said Sotomayor was not asked her legal opinions of that procedure or the related right to privacy.

The White House says it started the selection process by examining the records and writings of 40 prospective nominees but made direct contact with only nine of them.

The officials portrayed Mr. Obama's outreach as unprecedented, saying he consulted with each and every member of the Senate Judiciary Committee during the selection process.

Now that process shifts to getting the nominee confirmed by the Senate before the August congressional recess.

Counsel to the Vice President Cynthia Hogan will serve as point-person for that effort. The senior officials rejected the idea of setting up a "war room" to oversee the process, saying they don't anticipate a war over Sotomayor.

She's been through Senate confirmation twice before, and the White House expects smooth sailing the third time around.


(CBS)
Mark Knoller is a CBS News White House correspondent. You can read more of his posts in Hotsheet here. You can also follow him on Twitter here: http://twitter.com/markknoller.



Do you approve of President's Obama choice of Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court?
 Yes
 No




Tags:
Sonia Sotomayor ,
Supreme Court
Topics:
Sonia Sotomayor
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 76 Comments
by impeachbhb May 27, 2009 9:19 AM EDT
This is a great pick. She does not like white people and will make sure reverse discrimination is tolerated. She can also help set new policy so us dumb American people cannot decide anything at the polls. Great Choice to help Obama in his quest to bring down our country.

I was relieved, when I saw the photo, I thought he had nominated the teleprompter.
Reply to this comment
by dectra May 27, 2009 8:49 AM EDT
Wow.

The level of ignorance on this board is astounding. If you don't like the president, ok, that's your right. But to resort to blatant racist and overtly hostile comments about a respected jurist to make your "opinion" public??

She's a good judge, well qualified, intelligent, and versed in the law.

Confirm her, and be done with this useless prattle.
Reply to this comment
by perceptions5 May 27, 2009 7:48 AM EDT
Well as a moderate Republican I think that she's probably the best we could possibly expect from Obama.

At least she's a Catholic and probably believes that Jesus Christ is her savior ...............vs. believing that she's related to an ape.

Not sure where she will come down on abortion rights...

President Bush gave Sotomayor her first opportunity as a judge and then Clinton elvated her so I think she should be fine.

At least she's not a Ruth Bader Ginsberg ..................

BTW Skyk 2009....................the Democrat Party are the old Confederates.........

Remember your Party was founded by a Slave Owner

The GOP was founded by a Freedom Fighter........FACT
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 May 27, 2009 7:38 AM EDT
skyk,
Don't get to cocky on 2012 just yet. When the bills come due from Obama and starts hitting the pocket books of the tax payer harder than ever before, and they will come due, people will be looking for "change". Everything is just fine until its starts hitting your own pocket book. It will be interesting to see the so called polls in a year or so. Who will the Dems run in 2012 when this happens, Hillary?
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 27, 2009 7:04 AM EDT
Well, he's got the hispanic vote, the female vote, and the gay vote covered for 2012 now.
Posted by GeorgeWHoover at 9:46 PM : May 26, 2009

Duh!? Have you seen what the Confederate Party has to run in 2012? LOL The President had that sowed up BEFORE this pick! LOL
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 27, 2009 7:02 AM EDT
The Confederate Party really finds itself in a BAD position on this one. They have used Race and Immigration to fuel the Hate of the blind that follow them so those sheep will be champing at the bit to see some RED MEAT from this hearing. The Problem? IF they give the Red Meat to the base then the fastest growing segment of our population, Hispanics, will hold them accountable. Those who make up the base of the Confederate Party lack the education and knowledge to understand that THIS Lady was BORN and AMERICAN Citizen. LOL Great pick and if the REAL Republican Party does not separate itself from the Klan faction THIS President will render the party helpless in a year.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 27, 2009 6:56 AM EDT
How did Obama pick her, probley the same stringent process he used to pick his cabinet,that is the ones that have not resigned,but we still have Geithner.
Posted by specialty8 at 3:47 AM : May 27, 2009

Oh I don't know! When you look at the Obama Cabinet in the area of qualifications, you do NOT find a Brownie or a Gonzo. To me that is the MOST important thing, not some stupid fringe talking point.
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 27, 2009 6:54 AM EDT
Rather than reasoning from legal principles to results, an Obama judge will begin with the result he or she desires and then figure out how to get there by what only looks like legal reasoning. This is not judging, it is legislating from the bench.
Posted by joe1022joe at 10:05 PM : May 26, 2009

You know this how? LOL How can any HONEST American make such a ridiculous statement? LOL Look maybe you haven't figured it out yet but spewing hate and trash is OLD, TIRED and no one pays it any attention anymore. In short your post means absolutely NOTHING!
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 27, 2009 6:52 AM EDT
He selected her the same way he selected the rest of his worthless corrupt cabinet. Eeny meeny miney mo!
Posted by roadking041 at 12:21 AM : May 27, 2009

Can you say the word Irrelevant?
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 May 27, 2009 6:47 AM EDT
How did Obama pick her, probley the same stringent process he used to pick his cabinet,that is the ones that have not resigned,but we still have Geithner.
Reply to this comment
by jodyrae4 May 27, 2009 6:15 AM EDT
Did she grow up a welfare baby? Did the tax payers pay for her education? Did she get all the special privledges because she is latina? hope not
Reply to this comment
by mrjoshcan May 27, 2009 4:22 AM EDT
American people know what the stanch stinker thinking now; takes one to know one! Maybe this New Yorker Sonia Sotomayor will do the rest of the country finally patronage, by controlling Diego immigration WAP, at US's unprotected Southern lines, closing the gap where Latinos and other Pancho like her are crossing the border into New York, Florida, Texas, California and now elsewhere infiltrating Washington DC. Flying red white and blue, claiming they are citizens of this country is enough disgrace that cap gunned birth control needs to be placed especially blasting New Yorkers runaway excess, where these test incest, dark faith Mongols like herself and White House lead, stealing freedoms away from honestly poised bright dominant killed conservatives, Caucasians alike. On the wayside, if White House correspondents are looking for a single collective history making event, Sotomayor being the first US Supreme Court Justice to be booted out of the country with their illegalities is very much historical. Ethnic Diversity "the German stronghold." Another upper for Germany - important German charisma; "...honorable Germans in righteous will. Germany victorious throughout war then and thereafter! blonde-blue unanimously amends. Better out respectful reasoning!"
Reply to this comment
by joe1022joe May 27, 2009 1:05 AM EDT
Rather than reasoning from legal principles to results, an Obama judge will begin with the result he or she desires and then figure out how to get there by what only looks like legal reasoning. This is not judging, it is legislating from the bench.
Reply to this comment
by maxcoffee-2009 May 27, 2009 12:25 AM EDT
Who knows... it always seems to come back to that.
Reply to this comment
by wtcmedic911 May 27, 2009 12:08 AM EDT
Thought these comments would be about the court appointee. how did it become wmd and 9/11?
Reply to this comment
by maxcoffee-2009 May 26, 2009 11:53 PM EDT
Wedepeople...
When did Cliton ever say that Iraq had WMDs? That was all Bush.
Madoff??? wouldn't you have to say that Regan, Bush Sr. Cliton, and W blew it on that one?
Enron... Ken Lay one of Bush's doners... Again Regan, Bush Sr. Cliton, and W..
It's not like Madoff and enron started in 1992.
Why try to single out the group that you don't like and ignore the mistakes of the ones you like.
Governement blew it. Not just one party... They all blew it.
Reply to this comment
by IrishWench01 May 26, 2009 11:08 PM EDT
Yes, despite the attempts of others.
Posted by gravyboat69 .......

Are "They" after you again? ;-)
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat69 May 26, 2009 10:58 PM EDT
gravy , you still here ?
Posted by Ur_Captian

Yes, despite the attempts of others.
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat69 May 26, 2009 10:57 PM EDT
wood?
Posted by gravyboat69 at 7:08 PM : May 26, 2009

That's balsa
Posted by weedapoopl

That would be falsa.
Reply to this comment
by weedapoopl May 26, 2009 10:38 PM EDT
As I recall, ample warnings were left with the Bush team by Clinton as he left. They ignored those warnings.
Posted by jimsmename at 7:06 PM : May 26, 2009

Bill Clinton is the one who ignored numerous warnings.

He could have caught the 9/11 pilots while they were taking flying lessons.

Clinton dropped the ball on 9/11, just like he did on Madoff, Enron, Worldcomm, Andersen Accounting,

and he flat out lied about WMD in Iraq, when he knew all along there were none.

No WMD have ever been found in Iraq after 1991.

As soon as I see Clinton supporters admitting to all of this, then I'll start talking about the way the Bush GOP squandered the opportunity of a lifetime to make real changes in our country, but they only used it to enrich and empower themselves.

But you dont' need me to tell you about that, do you.
Reply to this comment
See all 76 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER