Political Hotsheet
May 26, 2009 11:42 AM

Early GOP Reaction To Obama's Supreme Court Pick

(AP)
President Obama's selection of Sonia Sotomayor to replace David Souter on the Supreme Court is already garnering a range of reaction, some laudatory - New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand called it a "historic and fantastic decision" - and some less so.

Republicans are offering statements in response to the choice carefully calibrated to suggest both that they have not yet ruled out supporting Sotomayor's confirmation and that they are skeptical of her ability to offer fair and impartial judgments.

Consider this from Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee: "I will focus on determining whether Judge Sotomayor is committed to deciding cases based only on the law as made by the people and their elected representatives, not on personal feelings or politics. I look forward to a fair and thorough process."

Senate Republican Whip Jon Kyl, another member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, urged Democrats to allow the minority party plenty of time to examine Sotomayor's record. "Each member of the Senate has a constitutional duty to scrutinize judicial nominees before deciding whether to support their confirmation, and I will take great care in examining her record to ensure that she demonstrates personal integrity, a commitment to the rule of law, and a judicial temperament," he said.

Republican Leader Mitch McConnell also stressed the importance of a long process. "Our Democratic colleagues have often remarked that the Senate is not a 'rubber stamp,'" he said in a statement. "Accordingly, we trust they will ensure there is adequate time to prepare for this nomination, and a full and fair opportunity to question the nominee and debate her qualifications."

Conservative GOP Senator Jim DeMint was more directly skeptical, issuing a statement stating that some of Sotomayor's writings "seem to raise serious questions about her approach to the Constitution and the role of the federal judiciary." He added that he "will withhold judgment about her nomination until she has the opportunity to fully present her views before the Senate."

Senator Tom Coburn wrote that Sotomayor "deserves fair and open hearings," but he signaled that he is unlikely to back the nominee.

"It is critical that the Supreme Court reaffirm, not undermine, our Constitution's limited role for Congress and the President," he wrote. "The American people need judges who will interpret the Constitution, not rewrite it based on ideology or personal opinion."

Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele suggested that Republicans will "reserve judgment" on the nominee "until there has been a thorough and thoughtful examination of her legal views."

"Supreme Court vacancies are rare, which makes Sonia Sotomayor's nomination a perfect opportunity for America to have a thoughtful discussion about the role of the Supreme Court in our daily lives," added Steele.

The RNC later sent out a document suggesting that Steele is taking a more open-minded approach than former DNC chair Howard Dean did when Justices John Roberts and Samuel Alito were announced. (Here are the RNC's leaked talking points.)

GOP Senator John Thune offered a similar sentiment to his colleagues, saying "it will be important to determine if Judge Sotomayor will decide cases based on her own personal feelings and political views, or the bedrock rule of law." He added that he needs time to see if "she possesses unimpeachable integrity, high intellect, and a commitment to applying the law as it is written, rather than legislating from the bench."

And Sen. Jeff Sessions, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee - and the man who will be leading the GOP's efforts - said "we must determine if Ms. Sotomayor understands that the proper role of a judge is to act as a neutral umpire of the law, calling balls and strikes fairly without regard to one’s own personal preferences or political views."

"President Obama has stated his desire to have a full court seated at the start of its next term, a reasonable goal toward which the Judiciary Committee should responsibly and diligently move," he said. "But we must remember that a Supreme Court justice sits for a lifetime appointment, and the Senate hearing is the only opportunity for the American people to engage in the nomination process. Adequate preparation will take time. I will insist that, consistent with recent confirmation processes, every senator be accorded the opportunity to prepare, ask questions, and receive full and complete answers."

As for the other side of the aisle, Arlen Specter, a moderate Republican-turned-Democrat, issued a statement applauding the selection and signaling his clear support.

"Her confirmation would add needed diversity in two ways: the first Hispanic and the third woman to serve on the high court," Specter said. "While her record suggests excellent educational and professional qualifications, now it is up to the Senate to discharge its constitutional duty for a full and fair confirmation process."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy issued a statement arguing that the nomination represents an opportunity "to further the spirit of bipartisanship that Americans want by guiding the nation in installing impartial, fair-minded Justices to the Supreme Court who will apply our laws and not their ideology."

He called Sotomayor's record "exemplary" and wrote that "having a Supreme Court that better reflects the diversity of America helps ensure that we keep faith with the words engraved in Vermont marble over the entrance of the Supreme Court: 'Equal justice under law.'"

Democratic Senator Robert Menendez also offered his clear support, writing that Sotomayor has "shown a vast knowledge of the law, displayed the proper temperament and gained a breadth of experience that makes her an ideal nominee."

He also stressed the importance of her ethnic background. "With this particular selection, President Obama has chosen a qualified candidate while helping to diversify a bench that has never truly reflected the diversity of our society," wrote Menendez.

And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called Sotomayor "an accomplished, qualified and experienced nominee."

"I will do all I can to ensure Judge Sonia Sotomayor receives a fair and respectful hearing and the Senate's quick confirmation," he said.



Do you approve of President's Obama choice of Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court?
 Yes
 No



Tags:
Sonia Sotomayor ,
Supreme Court ,
Republicans
Topics:
Sonia Sotomayor
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 51 Comments
by SanityPlease May 27, 2009 10:00 AM EDT
When CHENEY was asked about wiretapping and torture being against the law, he said, SO WHAT!!!.

How come none of these principled GOPer's raised their voice then???

Stop your whining GOP, Obama won and you're OUT. Get it ..... OUT. What part of OUT don't you understand????
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 May 27, 2009 8:19 AM EDT
If you are a Catholic and pro-choice, something is wrong here. Hyprocite is a bad choice for SCOTUS.
Posted by architekker-2009 at 10:00 AM : May 26, 2009

Aren't the Catholic's the ones who sponsered the Inquestion talk about Hypricites. Killing gone wild by the Catholic's and now what they have something to say. Most Catholic's understand this and are tired of that nonsense. Of course we could talk about the Pope blessing the Nazi troops. Or how about the pedefiles that are just moved around. Hypricite is thy name.
Reply to this comment
by boatdocster May 26, 2009 11:10 PM EDT
Senator Tom Coburn wrote "It is critical that the Supreme Court reaffirm, not undermine, our Constitution's limited role for Congress and the President," he wrote. "The American people need judges who will interpret the Constitution, not rewrite it based on ideology or personal opinion."

Wow, where were all these GOP "protectors of the law" when Bush and Cheney routinely violated both the law and the Constitution of the United States??? Illegal spying on Americans, illegal imprisonment with out charges, spending money hand over fist, illegal torture, illegal preemptive wars, etc, etc. Everyone of these GOP losers were like sheep at the slaughter house - not a peep!

Now they suddenly find "Principles"??? Not likely...
Reply to this comment
by murrowseye May 26, 2009 4:04 PM EDT
"There are no more "liberal republicans". It's now an oxymoron. The few moderates that remain are badgered, marginalized, criticized, and threatened by their EXTREMIST party leaders. The fervent quasi-religious direction of the remaining core GOP "true believers' is becoming increasingly incompatible with a free pluralistic society.

Posted by DefendLiberty at 12:52 PM : May 26, 2009"

"Kill! Persecute the heretics!" Yeah, that seems to be the GOP way. There has not been a liberal Republican since John Anderson in 1980. Moderates? They are only moderately right-wing, rather than being moderate Republicans. The little known secret. The Republican Party has collapsed in on itself. I do not even recognize it as a viable party anymore. They are about as legitimate a party now as Libertarians.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti May 26, 2009 4:03 PM EDT
Honestly, does anyone even care what the GOP thinks? They are marginalized failures to the American people.
Reply to this comment
by murrowseye May 26, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
"This just in. The Republicans say no." I am sure Rush, O'Reily and Hannity are sharpening their knives and sending out their minion flying monkeys to find evidence to destroy her.
Reply to this comment
by DefendLiberty May 26, 2009 3:52 PM EDT
"Senator Tom Coburn wrote that Sotomayor "deserves fair and open hearings," but he signaled that he is unlikely to back the nominee. "

In other words. "I've made up my mind, but I want to make it look like I have not made up my mind." The GOP is pathetic and weak. All the far right and the CHRISTIAN TALIBAN has to do is say "jump" and the GOP answers "How high, Master?"

The GOP has become the last bastion of extremist far right fundamentalist/neocon orthodoxy. There is no infinitesimal compromise or accommodation to reality that these few zealots will tolerate. The ascension of FAR RIGHT ORTHODOXY as the driving force in the GOP should be a concern to ALL Americans. The GOP is running itself into a far-right corner. Voter self-identification with the GOP is down to 21% in the latest polling. Few moderate voices remain. There are no more "liberal republicans". It's now an oxymoron. The few moderates that remain are badgered, marginalized, criticized, and threatened by their EXTREMIST party leaders. The fervent quasi-religious direction of the remaining core GOP "true believers' is becoming increasingly incompatible with a free pluralistic society.

The extremist neocon takeover of the GOP is not the biggest problem. The CHRISTIAN TALIBAN has come to America, and it is the GOP. Religious extremists and their political hitmen steering todays rump GOP cannot be reasoned with. Their "belief" is all they need, and woe to anyone who differs or suggests the retention of a religion-neutral government. These people are dangerous. The only path to liberty is by keeping these zealots and nut jobs from power by ballot or by force if necessary. Defending the Republic against the THEOCRATIC RIGHT is patriotic and necessary to ensure liberty for all. Otherwise we will end up with the Christian Taliban running an IRAN STYLE DICTATORSHIP of CHRISTIAN MULLAHS.

The GOP is shrinking into an ever smaller and more RADICAL base. The only ones who will remain are the extremist Christian Taliban, Rush's dittoheads, and the far-right PARROTS who believe Fox News is actually "news". Truly frightening for the country.

Let them bow to their FAR RIGHT and TALIBAN MASTERS and oppose this nomination. All it will do is rev up the 20% of America that has swallowed the far right cool aid. The rest of America will hold it's nose and turn away.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti May 26, 2009 3:49 PM EDT
And Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called Sotomayor "an accomplished, qualified and experienced nominee."

For the CONS, these attributes usually works AGAINST someone. I mean look at their choices of Bushoccio and then Palin. I wouldn't hire those low lives to take out my garbage.
Reply to this comment
by hungry1968-15 May 26, 2009 3:41 PM EDT
Senator Tom Coburn wrote that Sotomayor "deserves fair and open hearings," but he signaled that he is unlikely to back the nominee.





Translation: "Let's give her the hearing before I vote against her."

What an idiot!!!!

What kind of moron would vote this POS into office?!?!
Reply to this comment
by marcodele May 26, 2009 3:33 PM EDT
Willy:

Obama won. Get over it.
Reply to this comment
See all 51 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

International recording artist Shakira on love, career and more. Watch Now

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER