Econwatch
May 13, 2009 4:02 PM

Obama Wants Government Control On Bank Paychecks

(AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)


In light of what he called in February a "reckless culture and a quarter-by-quarter mentality," President Obama’s administration indicated that it is looking for ways to create tighter controls over pay in the banking sector. The administration is seeking ways to make employee compensation mesh with performance, something that it believes hasn't been happening.

"We had a period where compensation practices just became completely unmoored from reality, defied gravity, and they created incentives for risk-taking that overwhelmed all the basic checks and balances in the system," Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner in an interview with Associated Press.

The administration is considering working through federal agencies such as the Federal Reserve or the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Fed, for example, could prohibit banks from giving bonuses for quantity rather than quality of loans made by banking loan officers.

The rules may also come through the legislature. Representative Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat, is putting together a bill that would give the government stronger authority to audit and control incentives if they are judged to threaten the economy.

The proposed new rules are still in the planning stages, but they are already proving controversial. Top bankers are opposed to the idea, which many have called either unrealistic or potentially damaging to the banking sector. Without incentives, they argued, many top employees can leave for the wild west of hedge funds. Furthermore, they said, government micromanagement isn't how banking works.

In addition, critics point out that the new rules would target not only the paychecks of top banking executives but also many employees below them. They would also apply to all banks, not just those who have taken government bailout money.

Right now, however, banks are not in the best position to bargain their case.

"As long as they are general in nature and could be enforced on a case-by-case basis,” said Edward Yingling, chief executive of the American Bankers Association, according to the Wall Street Journal. “What would never work is detailed regulation of compensation."
Tags:
compensation ,
paycheck ,
obama ,
SEC ,
federal reserve ,
incentive ,
regulation
Topics:
Regulation
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx

CBSNews.com On Digg

Add a Comment See all 46 Comments
by Trust_me_ May 23, 2009 10:51 AM EDT
Democrat Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Elected to four terms of office

"New Deal" strategy of Government funded initiatives, public works programs, and overhaul of the financial system.

Elected
1932-1936.

His other terms being 1936-1940, 1940-1944 and 1944-

till his death in office from a Cerebral Hemorrhage on April 12, 1945, in Warm Springs Georgia. He was 62

If he didn?t die at 62 how long would he have been in office.

This is all Obama is trying to do and why he is installing the exact system Roosevelt had.
Reply to this comment
by ianlou May 19, 2009 10:50 AM EDT
I have two words to say about Banks...



Credit Unions.
Reply to this comment
by Meijo751 May 14, 2009 7:21 PM EDT
AT age 81 I can not belive what the banks are doing and have done. I have a chance to re-finance and save my home. The only issue is I am close to foreclosure and the lender will not forgive interest that has accrued due to my being behind. I can secure a payoff without the interest and keep my home but the lender (Countrywide/BOA) will not hear me or work with me. They would rather take uncle Sam's money. Have a home in foreclosure and pay all the fees, legal and costs which would amount to more than what they would forgive. No wonder banks are failing, they have lost all sense of common business sense. They made their money over the years form me and have a chance at a payoff and they won't even respond. Mr. Obama you great plans are not working because the banks will take your money all day and never get it to where it needs to be Main Street.
Reply to this comment
by ianlou May 14, 2009 11:29 AM EDT
Anyone figured out a good use of the new permalink feature with posting here?

So far I've found it to be worthless.
Reply to this comment
by SperrySphere May 14, 2009 10:29 AM EDT
They did this under the Clinton administration and the banks found ways around it, and that led to the types of salaries, bonuses, and over-spending that we see today in the banking establishment. We don't need big government any more than we need private interest groups...Geesh!
Reply to this comment
by eighty-nine May 14, 2009 9:47 AM EDT
We need not worry Comrade Obama and his race towards socialism will save us all. LOL. Millions of stupid Americans voted for this guy because he promised to solve everyone's problems. Wake up, he can't do it, no more than Bush, Clinton or any of their predessesors could do it. Excessive government intervention always creates more problems than it solves. I predict he will be another Jimmy Carter; one term loser. The honeymoon and the incessant drooling over Obama will soon be OVER!!
Reply to this comment
by pensacola8-2009 May 14, 2009 9:00 AM EDT
If some of you actually knew the level of compensation that is received by the employees in question, you would change your minds.

There are some receiving far more than salary protection and compensation than 100-500 Union Employees combined.

President Obama has my complete confidence and empowerment to reform the banking system that broke itself.

Have you ever wondered about the Socialist Countries that used to be Republics? Some of them became that way overnight when the borrowers became angry after learning about the exhorbant salaries of the banking executives. The borrowers defaulted purposely and the government failed. In France, Iran, and many other countries, citizens beheaded or executed the greediest capitalists by the thousands. President Obama is not advocating for such thing. Instead, he calls for reform and fairness to avoid such an occurrence, here....after all...they underperformed and failed to extend fairness to their borrowers.
Reply to this comment
by cwdfreedom May 14, 2009 7:49 AM EDT
obama want's to control everything. he want's to set up his socialism and that makes me sick and very angry. it makes a mockery of our history. i pray the people will fight back and tell obama this is not what we want. we less gov., less gov. spending, no wasteful spending and reducd taxes and the market to operate freely without gov. control. that is what works best and history proves it. obama just wants to control our lives and limit our freedoms given to us in our constitution
Reply to this comment
by eightsigma May 14, 2009 6:23 AM EDT
You don't get to control wages of private entities...it's against the law...
Posted by Rowdy113 at 2:16 AM : May 14, 2009

Which law is wage control against?
Reply to this comment
by Rowdy113 May 14, 2009 5:16 AM EDT
Sorry Obama, NO CAN DO!

You don't get to control wages of private entities...it's against the law...

There's an easy solution to this whole thing...don't give banks anymore taxpayer money....

DUH!
Reply to this comment
See all 46 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Does dad need a nursing home? Dr. LaPook talks with a geriatrician about navigating a difficult decision.
Watch Now

About Econwatch

News and analysis on the state of the economy from CBS News.

E-Mail EconWatch

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Lieberman May Torpedo Health Care Reform

    (231 recent comments)