Political Hotsheet
May 8, 2009 1:02 PM

Decision On Polar Bears Infuriates Environmental Groups

(AP)
If environmentalists get their way, Ken Salazar may one day join the ranks of endangered species.

In a move that has infuriated environmental groups, the interior secretary announced today that he will uphold the Bush administration's decision to limit restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions that imperil Artic polar bears.

Environmental groups said that they had hoped that the Obama administration would overturn the rule, which currently only restricts the burning of fossil fuels within the bears' natural habitat. These groups point out that failure to more broadly regulate carbon dioxide, even those emissions released thousands of miles from the Arctic, cripples larger efforts to address the effects of global warming. Studies show that the melting of Arctic sea ice threatens the polar bears. A spokesperson for Greenpeace said that the bears will be extinct by 2050 if stricter rules are not embraced.

"Today's announcement shows a clear willingness to compromise when it comes to global warming science and policy." said Melanie Duchin, a global warming campaigner for Greenpeace based in Anchorage, Alaska. "I expected more from the Obama administration."

Earlier this year, Salazar angered many of the same environmental groups by endorsing another holdover from the Bush administration – a decision to remove gray wolves living in the Rockies and western Great Lakes from the list of threatened and endangered species. In a statement today, the secretary expressed sympathy for the plight of the polar bears, while justifying his decision not to extend Endangered Species Act protections to the iconic bear.

"We must do all we can to help the polar bear recover, recognizing that the greatest threat to the polar bear is the melting of Arctic sea ice caused by climate change," Salazar said in a statement. "However, the Endangered Species Act is not the proper mechanism for controlling our nation’s carbon emissions. Instead, we need a comprehensive energy and climate strategy that curbs climate change and its impacts – including the loss of sea ice. Both President Obama and I are committed to achieving that goal."

Salazar said that trying to determine how much carbon emissions by a coal burning plant in Pennsylvania is hurting bear populations is impractical. He called for a more comprehensive strategy to reduce global warming.

Greenpeace and the Center for Biological Diversity delivered almost 150,000 petitions calling on Salazar to eliminate the polar bear rule. They did not mince words in denouncing the Obama administration's decision.

"We need the change that Obama promised, not more Friday announcements from the interior department that they're going to sacrifice the polar bear and the environment to polluters," said Kassie Siegel, a spokesperson for the Center for Biological Diversity. "This is incredibly disappointing for the Obama administration to adopt Bush's polar bear extinction program as its own. Salazar's announcement is the worst kind of doublespeak."
Tags:
Ken Salazar ,
polar bears ,
Greenpeace ,
Center for Biological Diversity
Topics:
Environment
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 19 Comments
by realnews12 May 10, 2009 8:34 AM EDT
With over 25,000 polar bears around today, up from 10,000 a decade ago, it takes an idiot to believe they are truly endangered! But you won't hear the weeney greenies or the MSM tell you these facts.

Posted by billyarber at 2:46 PM : May 8, 2009

Please provide a reference for the numbers you quote.
Reply to this comment
by realnews12 May 10, 2009 8:30 AM EDT
Mr. Lie-buster: apparently you do not realize that all the fuss is about co2 driving temperature, not poisoning people. Co2 is lethal at over 50,000 ppm. Our atmospheric co2 is less than 400 ppm. To have any health effects at all, co2 would have to reach 20,000 ppm.

Posted by condilla at 9:00 PM : May 8, 2009

No one is saying that CO2 is "poisoning people". That is not and never has been the issue.

Too much CO2 in the atmosphere causes warming of the planet's surface and lower atmosphere by trapping infrared radiation emitted by the surface. This is called the Greenhouse Effect. It has already occurred on Venus.
Reply to this comment
by condilla May 9, 2009 4:09 PM EDT
Mr. Lie-buster: apparently you do not realize that all the fuss is about co2 driving temperature, not poisoning people. Co2 is lethal at over 50,000 ppm. Our atmospheric co2 is less than 400 ppm. To have any health effects at all, co2 would have to reach 20,000 ppm. Do the math and quit worrying.
Reply to this comment
by paddyhayes May 9, 2009 9:10 AM EDT
Who put a savior in the White House, azulene?

I don't think anyone who voted for him thought him any more than a mere man, subject to error.

Still, that was a substantial improvement over an arrogant man who could do little more than make errors.

It was you dittohead slack-jaws who stuck the "savior" label on him.
Reply to this comment
by paddyhayes May 9, 2009 12:39 AM EDT
You are so right, condilla.

Did you know that an organization in Cave Junction, Oregon, the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine, has a statement signed by 15,000 experts that say there is no consensus in the scientific community that there is a link between humans and so-called climate change?

OISM is run by Arthur B. Robinson.

Don't let the fact non of the five scientists at OISM is a climatologist. Never mind that an article circulated with Robinson's petition (The "Oregon Petition") was printed in the same typeface and format as the official Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, but the NAS was surprised to find that they had never printed any such thing. Never mind that the accompanying editorial from the Wall Street Journal "Science Has Spoken: Global Warming Is a Myth" was written by Robinson's two sons. Never mind that Robinson's article was not published at all until it eventually found its way into the journal published by the "Association of American Physicians and Surgeons", which is produced by Jane Orient, who happens to be one of the scientists at OISM.

That's all just liberal fakery to try to put down the man's good work!

I don't know about you, but the fact that Dr. Seymour Butts and Dr. I P Freely signed that petition reassures me!
Reply to this comment
by condilla May 9, 2009 12:00 AM EDT
Does everyone just believe commercials without checking the facts? The polar bear population is thriving - the "endangerment" finding is based on the premise that global warming is happening (which it isn't) and that co2 is driving it (which it isn't). The fictitious plight of the polar bears is just another excuse to tax co2, which is NOT a pollutant, and is essential to life on this planet.
Reply to this comment
by paddyhayes May 8, 2009 10:31 PM EDT
Bears and dogs shared a common ancestor several million years ago.

Hate to say it, but Obama is screwing the pooch on this one.
Reply to this comment
by gregscan May 8, 2009 10:26 PM EDT
Everyone in the world know the polar bear is an endangered species. Except the Obama Administration. I am a strong liberal, but I must say I am getting increasingly disillustioned by Obama's decision (or silence) on torture persecution, gay marriage, abortion etc.
Reply to this comment
by zjunk May 8, 2009 8:47 PM EDT
Yo - whitemale08 - consider the google search done. Nothing there. Incidentally, having done a lot of fundraising over the years for a lot of member based nonprofits like Greenpeace, let me say this - I wish there were loads of people lined up to give money to good causes like environmentalism. But there's not. And, you've got to be a little out there to think there could be. It's hard work getting donations, dollar by dollar, from individuals who care and give their hard earned bucks every month or year to support causes like this.

No conspiracy, just sacrifice. From the fundraisers, and the members.
Reply to this comment
by climatewarrior May 8, 2009 5:49 PM EDT
Salazar?s decision to adopt Bush?s illogical and illegal rule reducing protections for polar bears is extremely disappointing. Ask the Obama administration to reconsider by signing the online petition www.savethepolarbear.org
Reply to this comment
by billyarber May 8, 2009 5:46 PM EDT
The polar bear has been a unique species for over 130,000 years. Anyone who looks at a graph of the earth's temperature over that time period will see several times when the temperature was many degrees higher than today. The polar bear survived ice free conditions in the Artic during more than one such period over the past 130,000 years and they will again. Especially since only two of the sub-groups have shown any decline while 8 sub-groups have seen a growth in their numbers. With over 25,000 polar bears around today, up from 10,000 a decade ago, it takes an idiot to believe they are truly endangered! But you won't hear the weeney greenies or the MSM tell you these facts.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 May 8, 2009 5:09 PM EDT
Google 'green-peace movement funded by Wall Street/City of London.

You will never trust the sincerity of environmentalism again.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale08 May 8, 2009 5:07 PM EDT
Good for you!

It's about time you stand up to these Global Warmers who are funded by the very Wall Street/City of London to destroy the United States.

Even the whole 'spotted-owl' issue under Bush-the-dad was a complete fraud and funded by the very European oligarchs that own Wall Street/City of London.
Reply to this comment
by budmag06 May 8, 2009 4:59 PM EDT
Good for you, polar bear killer! It's one of the few things you've done right. It's great you first slapped the anti-war movement and now, the environmentalists. Now, if we could only convince you that global warming is a political fraud and how your Cap And Trade taxes will destroy the middle class and small businesses.
Reply to this comment
by louiville2 May 8, 2009 4:35 PM EDT
The Republicans have ideas. Unfortunately the voters have decided these ideas are old, tired, out of touch and totally obsolete for the 21st century.
Posted by koko98-2009 at 11:49

You should read this.


http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSN1954310520080520
Reply to this comment
by koko98-2009 May 8, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
The Republicans have ideas. Unfortunately the voters have decided these ideas are old, tired, out of touch and totally obsolete for the 21st century.
Reply to this comment
by CLoverNYC1 May 8, 2009 2:49 PM EDT
President Obama will go down in history as the one who whacked the polar bears.
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 May 8, 2009 2:29 PM EDT
Don't feel bad eviromental groups, your not the only ones that have been BS.
Reply to this comment
by jswilliams451 May 8, 2009 2:27 PM EDT
Climate change is a global problem; that must be dealt with on a national and global level. We just go this President into power. Let him fix the American Economy and our National Healthcare mess before we start calling him a Polar Bear killer. I mean, for Christ's sake.

Besides, reducing our CO2 by driving smart hybrid cars and electric cars (like Obama is pushing for) will do more for the Polar Bear than trying to use the Endangered Species Act in lieu of some kind of National Cap and Trade system.

The Environmentalists need to get a clue, and focus on what CAN be done (short and long term). Not what would be ideal, in their ideal world. That's just going to make them look extreme, and turn a lot of folks that would like to support realistic goals, away from THE cause.
Reply to this comment
See all 19 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER